SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Chychrun

Créé par: Ledge_And_Dairy
Équipe: 2021-22 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 15 déc. 2021
Publié: 15 déc. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
While I don't see it happening I think this is a pretty good base for a return.

Calgary likely targets forwards at the deadline instead but I would not be against adding a legitimate #1 to the roster either
Transactions
CGY
  1. Chychrun, Jakob
Détails additionnels:
Calgary is projected to have around 3M cap space at the TDL
ARI
  1. Coronato, Matthew [Liste de réserve]
  2. Kylington, Oliver
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (FLA)
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2023
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2024
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $76 889 166 $0 $15 000 $4 610 834 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 425 000 $2 425 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
800 000 $800 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
801 666 $801 666 $ (Bonis de performance15 000 $$15K)
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 950 000 $1 950 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flames de Calgary
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
900 000 $900 000 $
AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
15 déc. 2021 à 19 h 53
#1
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 18,666
Mentions "j'aime": 6,762
Yeah, Coyotes don't do that.
Jrader17 a aimé ceci.
15 déc. 2021 à 19 h 53
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,937
Mentions "j'aime": 14,600
Much better offer than most on here
15 déc. 2021 à 19 h 56
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,642
Mentions "j'aime": 19,746
Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
Yeah, Coyotes don't do that.


You are probably right but I did try to base it off of the Jones trade
15 déc. 2021 à 19 h 56
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 230
Mentions "j'aime": 45
Add in Zary and 2023 unprotected 1st and then lets talk.
15 déc. 2021 à 19 h 57
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 230
Mentions "j'aime": 45
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
You are probably right but I did try to base it off of the Jones trade


Jones is older, and wanted an extension that came in at double what Chychrun makes...
15 déc. 2021 à 19 h 59
#6
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 18,666
Mentions "j'aime": 6,762
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
You are probably right but I did try to base it off of the Jones trade


They'd probably want Hanifin.
15 déc. 2021 à 19 h 59
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,642
Mentions "j'aime": 19,746
Quoting: Jrader17
Jones is older, and wanted an extension that came in at double what Chychrun makes...


So should I base it off when Calgary traded for Dougie instead? Much closer in age

You arent getting a better return than Eichel here.
soooonk a aimé ceci.
15 déc. 2021 à 20 h 0
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,642
Mentions "j'aime": 19,746
Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
They'd probably want Hanifin.


Im quite confident they would not want Hanifin since that is 1. a downgrade, 2. a year older, and 3. 1 less year of term.

No logic in asking for Hanifin at all for Arizona

Their ask would start with something like Buffalo not budging on a top prospect for Eichel like Krebs. Coronato is that
15 déc. 2021 à 20 h 4
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 4,986
Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
I think you would need to replace Kylington with a 1st or equivalent in value. I know Pelletier is off the table but perhaps Zary or give them another 1st and get a late 2nd/early 3rd.

Even after all this I think they could still say no.
15 déc. 2021 à 20 h 6
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,642
Mentions "j'aime": 19,746
Quoting: Aussie_Blackhawk
I think you would need to replace Kylington with a 1st or equivalent in value. I know Pelletier is off the table but perhaps Zary or give them another 1st and get a late 2nd/early 3rd.

Even after all this I think they could still say no.


I completely understand that line of thinking. The issue is that would not work for Calgary as they would have a LD logjam, kinda why I implied in the description I find it highly unlikely for Calgary to be in talks here. Kylington is probably worth a 1st right now in trade value. If he were to come with a good LT extension would that make more sense?
15 déc. 2021 à 20 h 57
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 9,527
Mentions "j'aime": 8,968
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
You are probably right but I did try to base it off of the Jones trade

Can’t win for losing here lol, this is literally nearly on par with what Eichel got and everyone just immediately dismisses it like we should be paying through the nose for a defenseman that had inflated numbers last year and has sucked this year. He’s still a top tier guy, but his finishing was inflated last year and has fallen back to earth. And we’ve had enough recent changes of scenery to show that being good for a bit and then struggling on a bad team does not mean that you’re actually good (Ristolainen and OEL for example). I don’t think we should trade Coronato for anything, so if this is what Chychrun requires it’s probably already too much, we’ll be fine with just Kylington for cheaper and go after a forward upgrade.
soooonk a aimé ceci.
15 déc. 2021 à 21 h 5
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,642
Mentions "j'aime": 19,746
Quoting: Alfie11
Can’t win for losing here lol, this is literally nearly on par with what Eichel got and everyone just immediately dismisses it like we should be paying through the nose for a defenseman that had inflated numbers last year and has sucked this year. He’s still a top tier guy, but his finishing was inflated last year and has fallen back to earth. And we’ve had enough recent changes of scenery to show that being good for a bit and then struggling on a bad team does not mean that you’re actually good (Ristolainen and OEL for example). I don’t think we should trade Coronato for anything, so if this is what Chychrun requires it’s probably already too much, we’ll be fine with just Kylington for cheaper and go after a forward upgrade.


I think you are underrating Chychrun a bit, he has been good for a few years now and is just playing on a really bad team this year. His numbers this year are way more of an anomaly than last years.

I do agree though that he probably isn't the right target for the Flames but I would not be against acquiring him by any means either
Alfie11 a aimé ceci.
15 déc. 2021 à 21 h 48
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 4,986
Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
I completely understand that line of thinking. The issue is that would not work for Calgary as they would have a LD logjam, kinda why I implied in the description I find it highly unlikely for Calgary to be in talks here. Kylington is probably worth a 1st right now in trade value. If he were to come with a good LT extension would that make more sense?


I see what you mean there, he is on a breakout year. I think ARI would want someone a little more proven (greater record of doing it) then Kylington. I just feel they would have a preference for a high pick over getting a player in return. Chychrun is on a really bad team this year, so looks worse but his cap and term and value to ARI I think would make you have to pay a little more.
15 déc. 2021 à 21 h 51
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 9,527
Mentions "j'aime": 8,968
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
I think you are underrating Chychrun a bit, he has been good for a few years now and is just playing on a really bad team this year. His numbers this year are way more of an anomaly than last years.

I do agree though that he probably isn't the right target for the Flames but I would not be against acquiring him by any means either

I wouldn’t be against acquiring him of course, I think he’d be great with Tanev, but in reality he had one elite year, and like one or two okay years before that. OEL had more consistently excellent years on Arizona where he was in the Norris conversation. This isn’t a guy with a proven track record of elite status having a cold start, he’s been an okay guy who had one elite year carried by 100% finishing and G/60 (by jfresh’s chart) and is now having a down year. He’s not close to Eichel, an established superstar 1C with 5 years left. His price should be the Eichel deal minus a 1st.
15 déc. 2021 à 22 h 10
#15
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,642
Mentions "j'aime": 19,746
Quoting: Aussie_Blackhawk
I see what you mean there, he is on a breakout year. I think ARI would want someone a little more proven (greater record of doing it) then Kylington. I just feel they would have a preference for a high pick over getting a player in return. Chychrun is on a really bad team this year, so looks worse but his cap and term and value to ARI I think would make you have to pay a little more.


Getting a high pick from a contending team is pretty unrealistic, thats why I put in Coronato (just picked 12th OA).
16 déc. 2021 à 1 h 59
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 4,986
Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Getting a high pick from a contending team is pretty unrealistic, thats why I put in Coronato (just picked 12th OA).


Yeah I would think their ask would look something like this. Whether they get that or not is a different thing. I like your offer, its def one of the better ones going but the reported ask is "massive" and teams have apparently not been put off by it.

Calgary Flames:

Chychrun

Arizona Coyotes:

Coronato
22' 1st
22' 2nd
Zary
16 déc. 2021 à 2 h 3
#17
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,642
Mentions "j'aime": 19,746
Quoting: Aussie_Blackhawk
Yeah I would think their ask would look something like this. Whether they get that or not is a different thing. I like your offer, its def one of the better ones going but the reported ask is "massive" and teams have apparently not been put off by it.

Calgary Flames:

Chychrun

Arizona Coyotes:

Coronato
22' 1st
22' 2nd
Zary


I can understand that ask but it doesnt work for the Flames needs. A dman would have to go out. I chose Kylington because his next paycheck will be more than Valimaki's. Realistically Calagry is going to be looking to add scoring depth, not defensemen
Aussie_Blackhawk a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage