SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Why shouldnt CBJ do this today

Créé par: exo2769
Équipe: 2021-22 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 12 déc. 2021
Publié: 12 déc. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
The Hawks are playing better hockey lately. They're not going to be the last place or 2nd to last place team. You "help" the Hawks by slightly overpaying for DeHaan, but you really help yourself because the #5 pick is better than the #10 pick by a ton.

That's the math Jarmo should be doing. If he can remove the guy that's currently playing the #1LD...does that make my CHI draft pick better? The Hawks will always have a certain percentage to win the lottery. For every "extra" 5% the Hawks get to Wright....they have a 95% chance that CBJ gets 1 more pick better.

You still can't overpay for DeHaan but a ton, but make sure you get KD to accept. And by the way....you're still in the playoff hunt too. He really can help your own young Dmen develop.
Transactions
CHI
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (TBL)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de EDM
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CHI
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $57 980 880 $452 439 $2 615 000 $23 519 120 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
880 833 $880 833 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
912 500 $912 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
975 000 $975 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
12 déc. 2021 à 12 h 3
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 879
Mentions "j'aime": 535
Are you okay? Reading this is giving me a migraine
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
12 déc. 2021 à 12 h 6
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,297
Mentions "j'aime": 4,946
I don't think Davidson and King realize that this team isn't getting back into the wildcard hunt yet
exo2769 et Aussie_Blackhawk a aimé ceci.
12 déc. 2021 à 12 h 7
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,749
Mentions "j'aime": 7,382
so you admit it's an over pay....and that columbus would be helping the hawks out by trading for him at all. That's some interesting logic
dopplsan et exo2769 a aimé ceci.
12 déc. 2021 à 12 h 33
#4
Nah.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,486
Mentions "j'aime": 4,372
If he was a RD and could come with a cheap extension, maybe. CBJ have no need for LD - our blue line is already either stacked with long terms pieces, or uses the space to give young guys playing time.

Not to mention, looking at CHI’s upcoming schedule, it’s going to get tough. All told, I expect their pick will probably be Top-10.

I think the better question right now is what this team does at TDL. Trade away all the players you can for futures and hope you are bad enough that it turns out to be 1 or 2 OA (while risking a better pick go to CBJ), or try and fight it out this season so the conveyed pick is as “good” as possible, and chalk any anti-tanking to a sort of “we’re trying to build character” type excuse?
A_Habs_fan et exo2769 a aimé ceci.
12 déc. 2021 à 13 h 16
#5
Démarrer sujet
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,684
Mentions "j'aime": 9,837
Modifié 12 déc. 2021 à 13 h 41
Quoting: dopplsan
If he was a RD and could come with a cheap extension, maybe. CBJ have no need for LD - our blue line is already either stacked with long terms pieces, or uses the space to give young guys playing time.

Not to mention, looking at CHI’s upcoming schedule, it’s going to get tough. All told, I expect their pick will probably be Top-10.

I think the better question right now is what this team does at TDL. Trade away all the players you can for futures and hope you are bad enough that it turns out to be 1 or 2 OA (while risking a better pick go to CBJ), or try and fight it out this season so the conveyed pick is as “good” as possible, and chalk any anti-tanking to a sort of “we’re trying to build character” type excuse?


The pick already sent to CBJ is a "sunk cost" you can't change it. It's not wasting time if your CBJ. If you can make that pick a better pick while also helping your own team...why not.

KD can't focused on the CHI 2022 1st even if they trade everyone away. He needs to focus on whatever he thinks makes this team better.
dopplsan a aimé ceci.
12 déc. 2021 à 13 h 17
#6
Démarrer sujet
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,684
Mentions "j'aime": 9,837
Modifié 12 déc. 2021 à 13 h 40
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
so you admit it's an over pay....and that columbus would be helping the hawks out by trading for him at all. That's some interesting logic


If CBJ can make a projected #7 to a #4 all while making your own playoff chances better...it's worth it.
12 déc. 2021 à 13 h 32
#7
Nah.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,486
Mentions "j'aime": 4,372
Quoting: exo2769
The pick already sent to CBJ is a "sunk cost" you can't change it. It's not wanting time ymif your CBJ. If you can make that pick a better pick while also helping your own team...why not.

KD can't focused on the CHI 2022 even if they trade everyone away. He needs to focus on whatever he thinks makes this team better.


I get what you’re saying. Even if he is your #1 LD, I’m not sure the loss of DeHaan, considering how bad CHI otherwise may be, is enough to be consequential in anything more than, what, a loss or two? The guy hasn’t scored a single point all season.

So, what I’m saying is, I’m not sure giving up a 3rd rounder is enough to make a difference in order to “buy” a loss or two. Plus, for every draft spot “worse” for CHI (slash better for CBJ), the odds you gain of the better draft spot have to be taken in with the improved odds the pick is 1 or 2 OA, and is retained by CHI.

And I mean, if that happens, sure the pick is then unprotected in 2023, but if CHI gets a Shane Wright, I don’t see them as being a worse team next year. Still probably bottom-10, but not worse.

Then again, I don’t follow them as closely. As a CBJ fan, I’m just tracking them because of the pick.
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
12 déc. 2021 à 13 h 56
#8
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 27
Mentions "j'aime": 11
Overpay
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage