SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Get more picks in order to flip them for players at the draft

Créé par: Seanovision
Équipe: 2021-22 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 8 nov. 2021
Publié: 2 déc. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Trading expiring contracts for picks. At the draft, package up some picks for a player or two (dont know who you would target, just better than what they have now). They need help, but this year is a lost cause, and I don't think bringing in current players in the middle of the season is a viable option. They are what they are for now. One thing they don't need is a lot more picks. Time to flip/package some of what you can gain this season for some help next season.
Transactions
1.
OTT
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
2.
OTT
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
TOR
  1. Holden, Nick (850 000 $ retained)
3.
OTT
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
4.
OTT
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2022 (ANA)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de TBL
Logo de OTT
Logo de VAN
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de ANA
Logo de OTT
Logo de NYI
2023
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
Logo de EDM
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de NSH
2024
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $61 404 924 $0 $4 507 500 $20 095 076 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 330 674 $8 330 674 $
AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 975 000 $4 975 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
3 600 000 $3 600 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
749 250 $749 250 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
747 500 $747 500 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
726 667 $726 667 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 7
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
787 500 $787 500 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance450 000 $$450K)
DG/DD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
900 000 $900 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
725 000 $725 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
2 déc. 2021 à 9 h 38
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
No thanks on Sanford.
2 déc. 2021 à 9 h 43
#2
sensonfire
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 11,957
Mentions "j'aime": 4,485
1. Tierney is worth a 3rd round pick if no salary is retained.

2. Trade for Holden is about right.

3. Trade for Sanford is about right.

4. Ennis is worth a 5th round pick at a minimum.
Radu47 a aimé ceci.
2 déc. 2021 à 9 h 56
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 54
Mentions "j'aime": 8
Quoting: sensonfire
1. Tierney is worth a 3rd round pick if no salary is retained.

2. Trade for Holden is about right.

3. Trade for Sanford is about right.

4. Ennis is worth a 5th round pick at a minimum.


Beauty, if you think they can get more for these guys, then great!! That just means that hopefully they can flip them for more value later.
sensonfire et Radu47 a aimé ceci.
2 déc. 2021 à 10 h 14
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,866
Mentions "j'aime": 7,417
The leafs do not need bottom roster players. They already have too many and keep shedding them because they have nowhere to put them
2 déc. 2021 à 10 h 25
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,162
Mentions "j'aime": 7,791
Quoting: Seanovision
Trading expiring contracts for picks. At the draft, package up some picks for a player or two (dont know who you would target, just better than what they have now). They need help, but this year is a lost cause, and I don't think bringing in current players in the middle of the season is a viable option. They are what they are for now. One thing they don't need is a lot more picks. Time to flip/package some of what you can gain this season for some help next season.


This makes a lot of sense, I'm surprised that we don't see it more often. Draft picks have their lowest value at the deadline and their highest value at the draft. Conversely, players have their highest value at the deadline.

Why aren't more teams buying low and selling high like you're suggesting?
Radu47 a aimé ceci.
2 déc. 2021 à 10 h 57
#6
Vegan Commie Hipster
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 7,888
Mentions "j'aime": 3,256
Good concept ✔

Which players would you like to see them acquire

With the picks
3 déc. 2021 à 10 h 11
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 54
Mentions "j'aime": 8
Quoting: CD282
This makes a lot of sense, I'm surprised that we don't see it more often. Draft picks have their lowest value at the deadline and their highest value at the draft. Conversely, players have their highest value at the deadline.

Why aren't more teams buying low and selling high like you're suggesting?


Thanks for the feedback and the positivity!! I have also kind of wondered that in the past, why aren't picks acquired more when teams are valuing them less, then flipped when teams are valuing them more? I think you need to be in a unique situation, but you need to following:

- Expiring contracts that are attractive to contending teams
- Not at the beginning of a rebuild, where you want to hoard as many picks as possible.
- You have salary cap room to make trades without going $ in, $out. Have the capability to be relief for cap strapped teams who might be willing to let go of some players with higher value contracts.

If you are setup with the above, you position yourself well in my opinion.
CD282 a aimé ceci.
3 déc. 2021 à 10 h 44
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 54
Mentions "j'aime": 8
Quoting: Radu47
Good concept ✔

Which players would you like to see them acquire

With the picks


Thanks, I like the concept too!

I would head after some Teams that are tight against the cap that might need some relief.

Who would immediately come to mind would be Marchessault, or Martinez out of Vegas (they will likely need to do something to be cap compliant in the offseason, and re-sign Hague). Maybe a 2nd and a good prospect for one of those guys?

I think Winnipeg might need to lose someone in the offseason too, with Copp, Dubois, and some of their young guys coming up for contracts. Maybe you can peel a defenseman out of there(Schmidt?).

Florida might be a good target as well, with Barkov and Verhaeghe contracts kicking in. Maybe you can get Gudas or Montour out of Florida for a 2nd round pick?

Vancouver as well, they have high payroll, and likely want to start to re-asses what they have. Package some picks together and a good prospect to try and get Boeser?

I am not suggesting to go after all of these players, but more as options on what you could try.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage