SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

TD moves

Créé par: Dekes
Équipe: 2021-22 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 4 nov. 2021
Publié: 4 nov. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
after the TD i think john gibson will be moved in the offseason to Edmonton, i doubt he will be moved now as they don't have a replacement yet atleast in the offseason they have free agency or via trade to find one
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. Beecher, John [Liste de réserve]
  2. Moore, John
  3. Vaakanainen, Urho
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
  5. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (BOS)
BOS
  1. Getzlaf, Ryan (1 500 000 $ retained)
  2. Lindholm, Hampus (2 600 000 $ retained)
2.
ANA
  1. Foudy, Jean-Luc
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (COL)
3.
ANA
  1. Dermott, Travis
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
TOR
  1. Manson, Josh (2 000 000 $ retained)
4.
ANA
  1. Khusnutdinov, Marat [Liste de réserve]
  2. Rask, Victor
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (MIN)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de TOR
Logo de ANA
Logo de MIN
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de TOR
Logo de NSH
2023
Logo de ANA
Logo de COL
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de TOR
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2024
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $61 022 417 $0 $2 332 500 $20 477 583 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 037 500 $2 037 500 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
874 125 $874 125 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
874 125 $874 125 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
822 500 $822 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 295 000 $1 295 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
4 nov. 2021 à 23 h 17
#26
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 4,426
Mentions "j'aime": 3,150
Quoting: wabit
Retain so Henrique is in the $3m-$3.5m a year range and it's an okay deal for MN.


I wouldn't give them Khusnutdinov for Henrique, retained or not, Rask involved or not.

Henrique isn't worth it. Not at that cost or point. Retaining doesn't change that fact at all.
GophersBenJ a aimé ceci.
4 nov. 2021 à 23 h 25
#27
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,536
Mentions "j'aime": 22,686
Quoting: Dekes
reilly is not very strong defensively same goes with lilly and sandin all 3 are very offensive orientated dermott is average defensively and holl i don't know enough about


So the Ducks who have big names and cap for their Dmen are better defensively than the Leafs? No. Manson what's he now the 4th best Dman on the Ducks at best. Leafs aren't giving up all that for an iffy better Dman than Dermot
4 nov. 2021 à 23 h 33
#28
Démarrer sujet
Dekesaladekes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,920
Mentions "j'aime": 1,058
Quoting: RazWild
His point is that Rask is off the books after this season is over and done with. Which means we're not paying someone to take him off our hands when it's not necessary or needed. Do we need a top six center upgrade? Sure, but not at that cost or for that kind of cap hit.

If Rask was included solely as a means of making the cap hit work, maybe. But we still wouldn't give up a prospect like Khusnutdinov for Henrique. Henrique isn't worth more than a C-level prospect at this point in his career, and that's if it was an overpay. Anaheim simply isn't going to get a borderline B+/A-LEVEL prospect of Marat Khusnutdinov's caliber back for Henrique though. That's just wishful thinking.


fair enough i don't truely know a whole lot off marat just kinda passing value off his stats and what ive seen him being traded for in other ACGM's i assumed he was a 3c/ fringe 2c caliber player so i thought that was fair value for henrique as that is what he is
4 nov. 2021 à 23 h 38
#29
Démarrer sujet
Dekesaladekes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,920
Mentions "j'aime": 1,058
Quoting: palhal
So the Ducks who have big names and cap for their Dmen are better defensively than the Leafs? No. Manson what's he now the 4th best Dman on the Ducks at best. Leafs aren't giving up all that for an iffy better Dman than Dermot


lindholm and fowler are the only other ones better then him in terms of all around ability and that's saying a lot as lindholm would most likely be the 1st/2nd dman on toronto. fowler is better offensively then manson but still slightly less at defence manson also is big physical presence. also if you are saying shattenkirk is better then manson you obviously only look at stats as shattenkirk hasn't been good at defence since his st louis blues days he is a strictly offensive dman and when it comes to building defence you would obviously take the better defensive guy then offensive guy as they are called "defence"men
4 nov. 2021 à 23 h 40
#30
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 1,907
Mentions "j'aime": 449
Quoting: Dekes
uhhh victor rask? you obviously don't watch much minny games lol. just watch an anaheim game you will see is much better then you think


I literally said rask was a free agent, so it doesn't matter if anaheim took his contract. Read what I write before responding. You are the one who brought up rask. No one said he was good
5 nov. 2021 à 0 h 38
#31
Démarrer sujet
Dekesaladekes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,920
Mentions "j'aime": 1,058
Quoting: CAPDumba
I literally said rask was a free agent, so it doesn't matter if anaheim took his contract. Read what I write before responding. You are the one who brought up rask. No one said he was good


rask isnt a free agent till next year
5 nov. 2021 à 1 h 39
#32
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 1,907
Mentions "j'aime": 449
Quoting: Dekes
rask isnt a free agent till next year


He's free agent after this year so you are wrong
5 nov. 2021 à 5 h 24
#33
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 8,209
Mentions "j'aime": 3,641
Quoting: RazWild
I wouldn't give them Khusnutdinov for Henrique, retained or not, Rask involved or not.

Henrique isn't worth it. Not at that cost or point. Retaining doesn't change that fact at all.


A 40p/yr, two-way. middle-6 center with a $3.5m x 2+ contract is worth a pair of 2nds. Marat K is not a great prospect, he's a good prospect. 3C or maybe a 2 LW is the about the best he'll be in the NHL, if he even comes over from the KHL.

The only way MN will get a center is to trade for one. They aren't going to sign on as a UFA. The center prospect (McBain) that is closest to NHL ready might not even sign in MN. Marat K is playing wing in the KHL. Khovanov was shipped off to the ECHL (at least he reported there). Dewar looks lost in the NHL so far. That just leaves all the eggs in the Rossi basket; and wouldn't take that chance.

I'd rather spend some futures to try and compete now with Kaprizov, rather than wait and see MN waste his prime years kicking the can down the road.
Dekes a aimé ceci.
5 nov. 2021 à 18 h 51
#34
Démarrer sujet
Dekesaladekes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,920
Mentions "j'aime": 1,058
Quoting: wabit
A 40p/yr, two-way. middle-6 center with a $3.5m x 2+ contract is worth a pair of 2nds. Marat K is not a great prospect, he's a good prospect. 3C or maybe a 2 LW is the about the best he'll be in the NHL, if he even comes over from the KHL.

The only way MN will get a center is to trade for one. They aren't going to sign on as a UFA. The center prospect (McBain) that is closest to NHL ready might not even sign in MN. Marat K is playing wing in the KHL. Khovanov was shipped off to the ECHL (at least he reported there). Dewar looks lost in the NHL so far. That just leaves all the eggs in the Rossi basket; and wouldn't take that chance.

I'd rather spend some futures to try and compete now with Kaprizov, rather than wait and see MN waste his prime years kicking the can down the road.


thank you lol, i knew i wasn't super far off on the trade so maybe just marat and a 2nd but all i see is that henrique is better then any other option they have for 2c. if they were target a 1c better then JEE it would require them moving one of boldy or rossi which i don't see them doing
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage