SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

offseason keeping core 4 and rielly

Créé par: winthecup
Équipe: 2022-23 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 28 oct. 2021
Publié: 28 oct. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
32 000 000 $
31 250 000 $
22 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1750 000 $
87 250 000 $
34 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
2.
TOR
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CGY
Logo de SJS
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2182 500 000 $82 623 950 $212 500 $0 $-123 950 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
796 667 $796 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
834 167 $834 167 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
G
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 8
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
28 oct. 2021 à 13 h 12
#1
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
I'd be shocked if you're not a mil shy on both of Campbell and Rielly. Cal Petersen's deal is the floor for Campbell IMO, and Campbell has been a heck of a lot better than Petersen.
28 oct. 2021 à 13 h 30
#2
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
And guess what….the team that sucks now will suck then.
28 oct. 2021 à 13 h 40
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 80
Mentions "j'aime": 10
Quoting: Lenny7
I'd be shocked if you're not a mil shy on both of Campbell and Rielly. Cal Petersen's deal is the floor for Campbell IMO, and Campbell has been a heck of a lot better than Petersen.


Yeah maybe on Campbell, agree with the Petersen comp. I can see a world where he signs for less to stay though, especially if they give him this offer soon.

On Rielly, the AAV is lower with the full 8-year term. I'd suggest his open market value is 8.5m AAV x 7 years = $59.5m total. If the Leafs offer 7.25m x 8 years = $58m total I think that could work for both sides. I don't know if this is the right thing to do for the leafs long-term, but I think it's fair unless he has a monster season and playoffs.
28 oct. 2021 à 13 h 48
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 198
Mentions "j'aime": 39
If the leafs fail this year again, the core won't be the same...
28 oct. 2021 à 13 h 54
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
And guess what….the team that sucks now will suck then.


Definitely no trolling going on here.
28 oct. 2021 à 13 h 55
#6
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: winthecup
Yeah maybe on Campbell, agree with the Petersen comp. I can see a world where he signs for less to stay though, especially if they give him this offer soon.

On Rielly, the AAV is lower with the full 8-year term. I'd suggest his open market value is 8.5m AAV x 7 years = $59.5m total. If the Leafs offer 7.25m x 8 years = $58m total I think that could work for both sides. I don't know if this is the right thing to do for the leafs long-term, but I think it's fair unless he has a monster season and playoffs.


Maybe on Rielly...My only argument would be that the LD UFA class this year is pretty much non-existent...Rielly, Hampus Lindholm and Klinberg are the only ones that really standout, with Rielly being the youngest of the 3, and best of the 3.
28 oct. 2021 à 13 h 58
#7
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
Definitely no trolling going on here.


There really isn’t. I just don’t understand the concept of having a team that doesn’t work, and just trying to force the same combo back for another run at futility. It’s not like this team is coming off a cup run and are having a slow start. It hasn’t worked since the beginning. They’ve had no success. Why keep it the same?
28 oct. 2021 à 14 h 16
#8
H.Lindholm Lover
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 3,607
Mentions "j'aime": 923
im convinced that if they lose in the first round, marner is gone, which sucks but i really dont see all four of them here again
28 oct. 2021 à 15 h 19
#9
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
There really isn’t. I just don’t understand the concept of having a team that doesn’t work, and just trying to force the same combo back for another run at futility. It’s not like this team is coming off a cup run and are having a slow start. It hasn’t worked since the beginning. They’ve had no success. Why keep it the same?


A Bruins fan jumping into every leafs post to say how bad the leafs are. Just doing a public service in his own mind.
winthecup a aimé ceci.
28 oct. 2021 à 16 h 4
#10
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
A Bruins fan jumping into every leafs post to say how bad the leafs are. Just doing a public service in his own mind.


That was not the intention of the post, and that should have been clear. The intention of the post was to question the logic behind keeping everything the same, despite the fact that the team, as constituted, is not successful. If you weren’t out looking for any sort of reason to get defensive, you might have gotten the gist of it.
winthecup a aimé ceci.
28 oct. 2021 à 16 h 40
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 80
Mentions "j'aime": 10
Quoting: Leafsfan7788
If the leafs fail this year again, the core won't be the same...


yeah I created that scenario too: https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/2869374
28 oct. 2021 à 16 h 42
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 80
Mentions "j'aime": 10
Quoting: odyssey
im convinced that if they lose in the first round, marner is gone, which sucks but i really dont see all four of them here again


agreed, I did that scenario here: https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/2869374

which I actually really like if they can get that much for marner...
28 oct. 2021 à 16 h 46
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 80
Mentions "j'aime": 10
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
That was not the intention of the post, and that should have been clear. The intention of the post was to question the logic behind keeping everything the same, despite the fact that the team, as constituted, is not successful. If you weren’t out looking for any sort of reason to get defensive, you might have gotten the gist of it.


yeah the point of this team wasn't "here's what they should do", it was more looking at the options. keeping everybody is an option. it's not impossible that they get their act together and then finally break through in the playoffs, which would lead towards this roster for next season. I'm not saying it's likely, but it's possible.
28 oct. 2021 à 18 h 41
#14
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
That was not the intention of the post, and that should have been clear. The intention of the post was to question the logic behind keeping everything the same, despite the fact that the team, as constituted, is not successful. If you weren’t out looking for any sort of reason to get defensive, you might have gotten the gist of it.


You are definitely smarter than everyone else in hockey and not a troll.
28 oct. 2021 à 19 h 6
#15
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
You are definitely smarter than everyone else in hockey and not a troll.


Probably not smarter than everyone. Definitely smarter than you apparently.
28 oct. 2021 à 19 h 28
#16
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Probably not smarter than everyone. Definitely smarter than you apparently.


Must be, because you are so good at not being a troll
28 oct. 2021 à 19 h 34
#17
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
Must be, because you are so good at not being a troll


I just don’t even get what is trolly about this. Which statement do you disagree with/think is a troll comment?
1. The leafs have not been good enough
2. If a team isn’t good enough, they shouldn’t just keep doing the exact same thing.
28 oct. 2021 à 19 h 45
#18
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
I just don’t even get what is trolly about this. Which statement do you disagree with/think is a troll comment?
1. The leafs have not been good enough
2. If a team isn’t good enough, they shouldn’t just keep doing the exact same thing.


The Bruins fan piping in on literally every leaf post saying the leafs are garbage claims he doesn't understand how he's trolling. Hilarious
28 oct. 2021 à 19 h 48
#19
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
The Bruins fan piping in on literally every leaf post saying the leafs are garbage claims he doesn't understand how he's trolling. Hilarious


I don’t chime in on all leafs posts. Do you disagree with my comments, or are you just here to complain?
28 oct. 2021 à 20 h 8
#20
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
I don’t chime in on all leafs posts. Do you disagree with my comments, or are you just here to complain?


Your words are empty. You clearly have a bias against the Leafs and enjoy arguing with leaf fans. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, what is it?
28 oct. 2021 à 20 h 33
#21
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
Your words are empty. You clearly have a bias against the Leafs and enjoy arguing with leaf fans. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, what is it?


Or I just see reality?

Classic case: this one. Do you disagree with either of my statements, i think both are as simple as 2+2
28 oct. 2021 à 20 h 36
#22
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Or I just see reality?

Classic case: this one. Do you disagree with either of my statements, i think both are as simple as 2+2


I don't care what you have to say. The fact you keep engaging and trying to convince me and other leaf fans that the Leafs suck proves everything I have said. You are just hear to get kicks out of chirping the leafs.
28 oct. 2021 à 22 h 38
#23
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
I don't care what you have to say. The fact you keep engaging and trying to convince me and other leaf fans that the Leafs suck proves everything I have said. You are just hear to get kicks out of chirping the leafs.


I’m not trying to prove that the leafs suck. I kinda thought at this point in the season based off what they’ve shown that was a given.

Are you happy with the way the leafs are performing?
28 oct. 2021 à 22 h 50
#24
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
I’m not trying to prove that the leafs suck. I kinda thought at this point in the season based off what they’ve shown that was a given.

Are you happy with the way the leafs are performing?


Imagine if fans treated all teams as maniacally as they do the leafs. They win 3 in a row and it's plan the parade time, they lose 4 in a row and it's time to rebuild. This is just silly. Boston lost 2 in a row, better trade everyone. They suck obviously
28 oct. 2021 à 23 h 11
#25
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
Imagine if fans treated all teams as maniacally as they do the leafs. They win 3 in a row and it's plan the parade time, they lose 4 in a row and it's time to rebuild. This is just silly. Boston lost 2 in a row, better trade everyone. They suck obviously


Have you been happy with how the leafs have performed over the last 5 years?
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage