SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Tarasenko

Créé par: Stgstg55
Équipe: 2021-22 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 22 sept. 2021
Publié: 22 sept. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Credit to Jah1722 for the idea.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
1750 000 $
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. Tarasenko, Vladimir
Détails additionnels:
Tarasenko could be a very valuable player for Anaheim this upcoming season: he could be a great mentor for players needing a boost in scoring terms, while still bringing good numbers.
STL
  1. Steel, Sam
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (ANA)
Détails additionnels:
2023 becomes 2023 2nd if Taraenko plays 70% or more of the Ducks games in 2021-2022 season.
2.
ANA
  1. Kaut, Martin
  2. Stienburg, Matthew [Liste de réserve]
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (COL)
Détails additionnels:
2023 2nd becomes 2023 1st if the Avalanche re-sign Rakell or the Avalanche win the Stanley Cup in 2022.
3.
ANA
ARI
  1. Milano, Sonny
Détails additionnels:
Placed on unconditional waivers for the purpose of contract termination.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de TOR
Logo de NSH
2023
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de COL
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2024
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $51 549 819 $0 $3 282 500 $29 950 181 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 037 500 $2 037 500 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 500 000 $$2M)
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 295 000 $1 295 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
874 125 $874 125 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
809 166 $809 166 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
22 sept. 2021 à 11 h 35
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 4,370
Mentions "j'aime": 2,235
Anaheim is going to be BAAAAAAAAAAAD, why trade an asset for a player to bring down your draft slot 2-3 spots?
Lenny7 a aimé ceci.
22 sept. 2021 à 11 h 46
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 3,584
Mentions "j'aime": 3,444
Colorado may have interest in Rakell, but that's too high of an asking price (imo).
22 sept. 2021 à 11 h 50
#3
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: NJDevils1317
Anaheim is going to be BAAAAAAAAAAAD, why trade an asset for a player to bring down your draft slot 2-3 spots?


I can see both sides of it here...I'm assuming the goal would be to buy low, and then sell high if you can get him back to a reasonable level...this trade is essentially a 2nd+conditional 3rd (That becomes a 2nd if blah blah blah), so the idea is likely if you can flip him at some point, even with some retention, the assets coming back would be greater than Steel+3rd.

At the same time, you're 100% right-If he does well, you're not getting a top 6ish pick anymore, which isn't ideal. If he does poorly, you've moved assets that you can't get back. It's a dangerous game to play for a team that has pretty much stood still with it's pending UFA's in Hampus, Rakell and Manson. It'd be fun to add an offensively gifted winger to the Comtois-Zegras line, but it's probably a dangerous move right now. I'd rather do something like Rakell for Tarasenko, instead of gambling with young guys/picks.
niko a aimé ceci.
22 sept. 2021 à 12 h 0
#4
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: Anus_McLeod
Colorado may have interest in Rakell, but that's too high of an asking price (imo).


I think the ask is going to end up being a 1st+B prospect (or late 2nd/3rd?). Will they get that? I suppose it'll depend on how well he's playing. That contract (especially retained...) is a good fit for a lot of teams that are going to need some reinforcements.

I'd be putting him with Comtois-Zegras to start the season to see if they can boost his offensive numbers a bit, which should increase the return.
Anus_McLeod a aimé ceci.
22 sept. 2021 à 12 h 10
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 3,584
Mentions "j'aime": 3,444
Quoting: Lenny7
I think the ask is going to end up being a 1st+B prospect (or late 2nd/3rd?). Will they get that? I suppose it'll depend on how well he's playing. That contract (especially retained...) is a good fit for a lot of teams that are going to need some reinforcements.

I'd be putting him with Comtois-Zegras to start the season to see if they can boost his offensive numbers a bit, which should increase the return.


I would do the same.

In terms of my comment, I don't think it's wildly off or anything. However, the condition and lack of retention make me think Sakic wouldn't be interested. My guess is his offer would be something like Compher, Kaut, and a third. If there is middle ground, then maybe it works. If not, I think they're happy to see if one of the youngsters can step up.

All that said, if it appears Colorado has a hole in the top six as the year progresses, they may have to reconsider what they're willing to give up at the deadline.
Lenny7 a aimé ceci.
22 sept. 2021 à 15 h 2
#6
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,417
Mentions "j'aime": 2,896
I feel like I’ve seen that Tarasenko trade somewhere…. Can’t quite put my finger on it tho lol
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage