SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

gigantic trades to get back to the light days

Créé par: NoWah49
Équipe: 2022-23 Kings de Los Angeles
Date de création initiale: 17 sept. 2021
Publié: 17 sept. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
33 000 000 $
68 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
43 000 000 $
13 250 000 $
25 000 000 $
22 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
ARI
  1. Vilardi, Gabriel [Droits de RFA]
  2. Walker, Sean
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (LAK)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (LAK)
2.
LAK
  1. Tkachuk, Brady [Droits de RFA]
OTT
  1. Kupari, Rasmus
  2. Quick, Jonathan
  3. Turcotte, Alex
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (LAK)
Rachats de contrats
Frais de résiliation
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de PIT
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2023
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de PIT
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2024
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2282 500 000 $78 845 001 $637 500 $3 310 000 $3 654 999 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance150 000 $$150K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 133 333 $1 133 333 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
795 000 $795 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 875 000 $1 875 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance262 500 $$262K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $
DD
RFA - 4
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
G
UFA - 3
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
795 000 $795 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
820 000 $820 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DD
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
17 sept. 2021 à 1 h 25
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,547
Mentions "j'aime": 6,140
Arizona declines the Chychrun trade.
LA declines the Tkachuk trade.
17 sept. 2021 à 5 h 23
#2
Serf
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 3,417
Mentions "j'aime": 1,461
Both teams decline, no one wants Quick, for two seasons. You trashed that offer including him.
17 sept. 2021 à 6 h 10
#3
Hockey 1st Sens 2nd
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 3,562
Mentions "j'aime": 1,592
With Quick as part of the deal that's a VERY easy NO from OTT.
And if you removed Quick it would still be a no... there'd just be less laughter when they said it.
Xspyrit a aimé ceci.
17 sept. 2021 à 10 h 34
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,495
Mentions "j'aime": 3,719
Quoting: tkecanuck341
LA declines the Tkachuk trade.


Surprised reading this

Quoting: TCMonkey
With Quick as part of the deal that's a VERY easy NO from OTT.
And if you removed Quick it would still be a no... there'd just be less laughter when they said it.


Exactly. First it would have to be LA's 2022 first, not 2023

In that case, it'd probably be close

Now the questions would be : do they want Turcotte and Kupari? Would they have a plan for them? Would they want different prospects from LA?
17 sept. 2021 à 13 h 9
#5
gavinray
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 2,167
Mentions "j'aime": 562
Turcotte has taken a huge step back since being drafted. Kupari is a similar level prospect. Pinto is better than them both. Ottawa says no, LA would be foolish not to take that deal.
17 sept. 2021 à 13 h 24
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,547
Mentions "j'aime": 6,140
Quoting: gavinray
Turcotte has taken a huge step back since being drafted. Kupari is a similar level prospect. Pinto is better than them both. Ottawa says no, LA would be foolish not to take that deal.


I don't agree with this at all. He had several injuries that derailed his development a bit, but he was arguably the best player in Ontario last season for the final 26 games of the season. He also had a fantastic development camp.





You can say that you're not a Turcotte fan, but he's still every bit the prospect he was when he was drafted.
18 sept. 2021 à 14 h 8
#7
gavinray
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 2,167
Mentions "j'aime": 562
Quoting: tkecanuck341
I don't agree with this at all. He had several injuries that derailed his development a bit, but he was arguably the best player in Ontario last season for the final 26 games of the season. He also had a fantastic development camp.





You can say that you're not a Turcotte fan, but he's still every bit the prospect he was when he was drafted.


I'm not saying he sucks lol he's a good player but he was projected to be much better especially for a 5th overall pick. Zegras, Cozens, Boldy, Newhook, Caufield, Pinto have all overtaken him as prospects. The point still stands that LA would be dumb not to trade him for Tkachuk if they had the chance.
19 sept. 2021 à 2 h 23
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,547
Mentions "j'aime": 6,140
Quoting: gavinray
I'm not saying he sucks lol he's a good player but he was projected to be much better especially for a 5th overall pick. Zegras, Cozens, Boldy, Newhook, Caufield, Pinto have all overtaken him as prospects. The point still stands that LA would be dumb not to trade him for Tkachuk if they had the chance.


If it were Turcotte for Tkachuk straight up, sure, but this trade includes another first and Kupari. The difference between Turcotte and Tkachuk is not worth it, especially with Turcotte looking fantastic so far this preseason.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage