SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Eichel if

Créé par: papishark
Équipe: 2021-22 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 1 août 2021
Publié: 1 août 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
If I am SJS, I put one condition on an Eichel deal, and that is no Eklund. The sabres just dont have the leverage to ask for a prospect as good as Eklund anymore. If they wont do it without Eklund, then theres no deal.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
32 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
54 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Foote, Nolan
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (NJD)
Détails additionnels:
First is lottery protected
2.
BUF
  1. Bordeleau, Thomas [Liste de réserve]
  2. Foote, Nolan
  3. Kniazev, Artemi
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (NJD)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de BUF
Logo de SJS
Logo de ARI
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $74 231 667 $0 $725 000 $7 268 333 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 550 000 $1 550 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
500 000 $500 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 025 000 $1 025 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
796 667 $796 667 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 108 696 $2 108 696 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
1 août 2021 à 9 h 37
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 4,363
Mentions "j'aime": 1,344
Deal from NJ
1 août 2021 à 9 h 41
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 591
Mentions "j'aime": 208
Starts with Eklund
1 août 2021 à 9 h 43
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,800
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: Elevatorboy
Starts with Eklund


Then theres no deal. Unfortunately thats just how it is with Eichel being in the situation hes in, hes not getting that kind of guy back
vols94 a aimé ceci.
1 août 2021 à 9 h 56
#4
Opie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,678
Mentions "j'aime": 654
Quoting: jrdroge25
Deal from NJ


I dont think NJ will have the room or desire to pay TM $10 mil next season & beyond (for the QO). He's far from a $10 mil player.
Devil et Tintin a aimé ceci.
1 août 2021 à 10 h 15
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 591
Mentions "j'aime": 208
Quoting: papishark
Then theres no deal. Unfortunately thats just how it is with Eichel being in the situation hes in, hes not getting that kind of guy back


Ok, no deal then. It’s hilarious because a week ago SJ would’ve offered their first round pick. Now that they make the pick, no deal LOL
Sabres923 et saku93 a aimé ceci.
1 août 2021 à 10 h 27
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 4,928
Mentions "j'aime": 2,670
Eklund+
saku93 a aimé ceci.
1 août 2021 à 10 h 41
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 1,258
Mentions "j'aime": 649
I really don’t know why we would ever trade for eichel we need firsts and I personally would never trade bordeleau
1 août 2021 à 11 h 11
#8
Speak of the Devil
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 23,941
Mentions "j'aime": 26,437
To all the Sabres saying it starts with Eklund, that's going to be very unlikely.
Ducks aren't including Zegras or Drysdale
Rangers aren't including Kaako, Laf, Fox, Lundkvist, Schneider
Vegas isn't including Krebs
Kings aren't including, Byfield (maybe Turcotte too)

Sharks can get away not including Eklund
papishark et vols94 a aimé ceci.
1 août 2021 à 11 h 17
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,800
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: Devil1122
To all the Sabres saying it starts with Eklund, that's going to be very unlikely.
Ducks aren't including Zegras or Drysdale
Rangers aren't including Kaako, Laf, Fox, Lundkvist, Schneider
Vegas isn't including Krebs
Kings aren't including, Byfield (maybe Turcotte too)

Sharks can get away not including Eklund


Exactly, if other teams can take those guys out I don’t see why the sharks can’t take Eklund out. I just don’t see why the sharks would offer Eklund unless they really really wanted Eichel and were willing to risk their entire future on him, which I and doubt DW are comfortable doing
1 août 2021 à 12 h 41
#10
Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 7,002
Mentions "j'aime": 2,852
San Jose better put lottery protections on that 1st rounder because any team with Alex Barabanov in the top 6 F group is in trouble.
1 août 2021 à 12 h 48
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,275
Mentions "j'aime": 2,896
Quoting: Opie
I dont think NJ will have the room or desire to pay TM $10 mil next season & beyond (for the QO). He's far from a $10 mil player.


You could just re-sign him before free agency or let him go to UFA and resign him that way. Not saying the QO isn’t a nuisance, but there are ways to work around it.
1 août 2021 à 13 h 2
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,800
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: NickC1988
San Jose better put lottery protections on that 1st rounder because any team with Alex Barabanov in the top 6 F group is in trouble.

He did very well for the sharks in his short stint. Obviously you never know if that will last, but the leafs didn’t ever give him a legit shot at even playing so I don’t think it’s right to judge him off of that
1 août 2021 à 20 h 19
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 4,349
Mentions "j'aime": 1,046
Quoting: papishark
Exactly, if other teams can take those guys out I don’t see why the sharks can’t take Eklund out. I just don’t see why the sharks would offer Eklund unless they really really wanted Eichel and were willing to risk their entire future on him, which I and doubt DW are comfortable doing


Sabres fans are not prepared that none of their demands for top end prospects are going to happen. its been months and no one has blinked. Adams will be forced by Eichel to make a deal for what will seem as subpar package. Every day that passes means the deal gets worse.
papishark a aimé ceci.
1 août 2021 à 20 h 45
#14
Opie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,678
Mentions "j'aime": 654
Quoting: FunMustBeAlways
You could just re-sign him before free agency or let him go to UFA and resign him that way. Not saying the QO isn’t a nuisance, but there are ways to work around it.


Well, first its important to note that the first $10 mil is unavoidable... that salary kicks in in the last year of the contract (the cap number of $6m is irrelevant); so the acquiring team would pay $6 mil year one, $10 mil year two & then be subject to the $10 mil QO. That's far too much for his level of production.

Additionally, there is little motivation for TM to sign an extension that is not a gross overpay, which is the purpose of such a structure. Letting him go UFA, instead of qualifying loses control (obviously) & would therefore reduce his trade value significantly, given there normally would be some implied value of the RFA status.

All this seriously compromises his trade value, particularly for a team like NJ that has a huge backlog of RFA / UFA contracts to sign in the next 1-2 seasons.
2 août 2021 à 17 h 23
#15
Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 7,002
Mentions "j'aime": 2,852
Quoting: papishark
He did very well for the sharks in his short stint. Obviously you never know if that will last, but the leafs didn’t ever give him a legit shot at even playing so I don’t think it’s right to judge him off of that


If he can keep up the pace over 82 games, then sure. But I highly doubt he does, San Jose needs more depth.
papishark a aimé ceci.
2 août 2021 à 17 h 31
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,800
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: NickC1988
If he can keep up the pace over 82 games, then sure. But I highly doubt he does, San Jose needs more depth.


I think Sj needs more top talent. Our depth is good, but the risk of having Balcers and Barabonov in the top six is not good.
2 août 2021 à 17 h 40
#17
Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 7,002
Mentions "j'aime": 2,852
Quoting: papishark
I think Sj needs more top talent. Our depth is good, but the risk of having Balcers and Barabonov in the top six is not good.


You know, 5-6 years ago, San Jose was in a pretty good spot with Couture, Meier, Labanc, Thornton, Pavelski, Hertl, Marleau, and Donskoi. Now they're really grasping at straws trying to get something right. I still like Couture, Labanc, Hertl, and Meier a lot, I just don't think they have the proper supporting pieces.
2 août 2021 à 17 h 59
#18
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,800
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: NickC1988
You know, 5-6 years ago, San Jose was in a pretty good spot with Couture, Meier, Labanc, Thornton, Pavelski, Hertl, Marleau, and Donskoi. Now they're really grasping at straws trying to get something right. I still like Couture, Labanc, Hertl, and Meier a lot, I just don't think they have the proper supporting pieces.


Salary cap problems have caused this. Problem is guys stopped taking team friendly deals, and Doug grasped to hold onto important pieces that became worse
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage