SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Leafs 2021-22

Créé par: jross13
Équipe: 2021-22 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 10 juin 2021
Publié: 10 juin 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1775 000 $
1750 000 $
2800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
23 400 000 $
54 900 000 $
22 600 000 $
21 500 000 $
32 300 000 $
11 000 000 $
22 600 000 $
11 050 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
2750 000 $
1750 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
TOR
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (VGK)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (TBL)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (DET)
DET
  1. Kerfoot, Alexander
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
3.
4.
TOR
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de VGK
Logo de TBL
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de PIT
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de DET
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $81 359 084 $0 $0 $140 916 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
796 667 $796 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 675 000 $3 675 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
725 000 $725 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
10 juin 2021 à 13 h 39
#1
TopDawgReese
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,241
Mentions "j'aime": 253
Why are we giving up Nylander for 1 year of Seth Jones?
10 juin 2021 à 13 h 41
#2
Leafs Sufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 4,073
Mentions "j'aime": 3,511
No. More. Trades. With. Boston.

Nylander trade is really bad.

Detroit very likely says no as well.
10 juin 2021 à 14 h 2
#3
Démarrer sujet
jross13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 44
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Modifié 10 juin 2021 à 14 h 8
Quoting: MauriceArthur15
Why are we giving up Nylander for 1 year of Seth Jones?


Sign and trade. (with Jones)
10 juin 2021 à 14 h 5
#4
Démarrer sujet
jross13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 44
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Modifié 10 juin 2021 à 14 h 32
Quoting: Ritzy
No. More. Trades. With. Boston.


Nylander trade is really bad.

Detroit very likely says no as well.


Who cares if its with boston or not? Boston has been 10 times the team the leafs have been. What would you rather do keep trading with teams of mediocracy and bringing back mediocre talent. Rielly is gone at the end of the season, get out ahead of it and improve depth in bottom 6 with players that are under control. Cap isnt going up

Leafs got the best player in Nylander deal? how is that bad?

Detroit doesn't matter you have to shed Kerfoot's salary. Could be lost in expansion anyway.
10 juin 2021 à 14 h 8
#5
Pop Pop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 14,745
Mentions "j'aime": 8,337
I'll give you a 3rd for kerfoot and just cut out the rest of the nonsense
10 juin 2021 à 14 h 12
#6
Démarrer sujet
jross13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 44
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Modifié 10 juin 2021 à 14 h 33
Quoting: Jfstompers
I'll give you a 3rd for kerfoot and just cut out the rest of the nonsense


Leafs need to add more picks. Your organization is better welcoming in three players to your system than one.
10 juin 2021 à 14 h 31
#7
PlusMinus is stupid
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 7,319
Mentions "j'aime": 7,154
Detroit doesn't want Kerfoot. Hard pass.
buffbry, RedWing9119 et Billy12Bob a aimé ceci.
10 juin 2021 à 14 h 34
#8
Démarrer sujet
jross13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 44
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Modifié 10 juin 2021 à 14 h 49
This roster construction is based upon the intrinsic value of players which the Leafs have failed to address in years past. You have to look at players like Debrusk, Kuhlman, Janmark, Bellemare, McGinn (all players who reached the second round of the playoffs this season playing bottom six roles for good teams; Colorado, Vegas, Boston, Carolina) and put them in positions where they naturally fit. All players with more pedigree and bring a role to the team that the numbers don't make sense of but the eye test does. Players with defined roles in proper slots, opposed to the collection of misfit players Toronto has been trying to role out the past few seasons. (Engvall, Mikheyev, Kerfoot, Ennis, Thornton, Simmonds, Boyd, Vesey, Gauthier, Moore, Lindholm, Timashov, Korshkov, Petan, Aberg, Malgin, the list goes on.) This shows an ability to adress bottom 6 roles necessary for competition in the playoffs.

Also shows an upgrade on defence. Jones is a better player than Rielly. (Bigger, smarter, more in your face, more difficult to play against, better shot, etc.)
10 juin 2021 à 14 h 35
#9
Démarrer sujet
jross13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 44
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Quoting: DeadWingsv2
Detroit doesn't want Kerfoot. Hard pass.


Doesn't matter team. Need to shed Kerfoot's salary. (Just an example)
Hutt a aimé ceci.
10 juin 2021 à 14 h 40
#10
PlusMinus is stupid
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 7,319
Mentions "j'aime": 7,154
Quoting: jross13
Doesn't matter team. Need to shed Kerfoot's salary. (Just an example)


Then why not put that in the trade description?
buffbry et RedWing9119 a aimé ceci.
10 juin 2021 à 14 h 50
#11
Démarrer sujet
jross13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 44
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Quoting: DeadWingsv2
Then why not put that in the trade description?


Sorry for spoiling your day. I'll be better next time.
Hutt a aimé ceci.
10 juin 2021 à 14 h 57
#12
mostly harmless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 7,015
Mentions "j'aime": 3,496
Quoting: jross13
Sign and trade. (with Jones)

If it's a sign-and-trade we're going to want more and better than that.
10 juin 2021 à 14 h 58
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 1,549
Mentions "j'aime": 838
Can we please stop trading Engvall to Edmonton? Plenty of guys like him out there for less money. You aren't getting even a depth pick for him from Edmonton.
10 juin 2021 à 15 h 1
#14
Démarrer sujet
jross13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 44
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Quoting: Viqsi
If it's a sign-and-trade we're going to want more and better than that.


Jones is far better and more valuable player than Nylander. Mikheyev is a replaceable player and need to shed cap.(lots of other payers that skate 100mph and don't hit or score)

If you're trading Nylander you can only bring back ONE player tops and it has to be an impact one; Jones is. Cap is not moving. Can't bring back multiple players that make money.
10 juin 2021 à 15 h 3
#15
Démarrer sujet
jross13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 44
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Quoting: rpain
Can we please stop trading Engvall to Edmonton? Plenty of guys like him out there for less money. You aren't getting even a depth pick for him from Edmonton.


Honestly depth pick would be ideal. He could be buried in the minors, taken by Seattle, who knows, he's a replaceable player and makes too much money to be one of those so just picked a team that needs help addressing bottom 6 with cap space. Sorry.
10 juin 2021 à 15 h 24
#16
mostly harmless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 7,015
Mentions "j'aime": 3,496
Quoting: jross13
Jones is far better and more valuable player than Nylander. Mikheyev is a replaceable player and need to shed cap.(lots of other payers that skate 100mph and don't hit or score)

If you're trading Nylander you can only bring back ONE player tops and it has to be an impact one; Jones is. Cap is not moving. Can't bring back multiple players that make money.

I was speaking from the Jackets' perspective.
10 juin 2021 à 15 h 34
#17
Démarrer sujet
jross13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 44
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Modifié 10 juin 2021 à 15 h 39
Quoting: Viqsi
I was speaking from the Jackets' perspective.


I would agree. Jackets are in a tough spot though because he doesn't want to be there. Ultimately, they have to decide how a player like Nylander at 6.9M with control compares to other deals. Unlikely, they get a deal that knocks their socks off because a team would just wait and take a run at him in free agency.

I don't know if the Jackets would feel comfortable going down the same road like they did with Panarin and Bobrovsky. Their team isn't exactly what it was in 2019 to take that gamble. Either way it will be interesting to see how that whole saga plays out.
10 juin 2021 à 15 h 35
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 1,549
Mentions "j'aime": 838
Quoting: jross13
Honestly depth pick would be ideal. He could be buried in the minors, taken by Seattle, who knows, he's a replaceable player and makes too much money to be one of those so just picked a team that needs help addressing bottom 6 with cap space. Sorry.


No worries, it's just that 90% of the AGMs with a Toronto Edmonton trade involve Edmonton taking a cap dump. We're coming out of salary cap hell but trying to contend so are unlikely to take over market value contracts without incentive. Plus we had a ton of guys to play 4C but haven't really found that true 3C yet.
10 juin 2021 à 15 h 38
#19
Démarrer sujet
jross13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 44
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Quoting: rpain
No worries, it's just that 90% of the AGMs with a Toronto Edmonton trade involve Edmonton taking a cap dump. We're coming out of salary cap hell but trying to contend so are unlikely to take over market value contracts without incentive. Plus we had a ton of guys to play 4C but haven't really found that true 3C yet.


Yeah no aha that makes sense. Engvall isn't really a fourth line centre either though lol. He's just not an NHL player period. Actually, I should correct myself, he can play in the league but he's probably not going to find himself on a team that is sniffing around a cup.
11 juin 2021 à 2 h 9
#20
Hutt
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 3
Mentions "j'aime": 1
debrusk is junk
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage