SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Gibson to Pittsburgh

Créé par: FLPensFan
Équipe: 2021-22 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 5 juin 2021
Publié: 5 juin 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I'm curious as to what Anaheim fans would think of the Gibson deal I have listed here. Pittsburgh has long wanted to bring one of the Pittsburgh natives (Saad and Gibson mainly) to the Penguins, and now Pittsburgh may want to solidify their goaltending. Pittsburgh is also looking to add some skilled size up front. Guentzel is a good goal scoring forward, but Pittsburgh is going to have to give up a decent forward to change their roster makeup. I think Guentzel may be a bit "old" if Anaheim is going to go full rebuild, but, Anaheim could flip Guentzel to another team and should be able to get a good return, such as a 1st, high prospect, and roster player (or bring in a 3rd team to get those resources for Guentzel in the Gibson trade). Marino would add another solid RH d-man behind Drysdale. Penguins would have to take on Kesler's dead contract to help even out the cap hit. Fair deal, or too one-sided in either direction?
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 500 000 $
21 500 000 $
2800 000 $
21 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
2850 000 $
33 000 000 $
22 250 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
PIT
SEA
  1. Zucker, Jason
Détails additionnels:
Zucker gets selected in expansion draft.
3.
PIT
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (NJD)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (NYI)
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de PIT
Logo de NJD
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de NYI
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2023
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $64 369 697 $0 $212 500 $17 130 303 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 940 000 $2 940 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 636 364 $2 636 364 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
850 000 $850 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
725 000 $725 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
5 juin 2021 à 22 h 16
#1
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,709
Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
Interesting proposal but I think Comtois is the deal breaker. I don't see Ducks dealing him.
Radu47, OldNYIfan et TZ11 a aimé ceci.
5 juin 2021 à 22 h 21
#2
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 33,053
Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
Coleman gets 4 x $4,000,000 And Anaheim says Hell No on the Gibson trade.
OldNYIfan et TZ11 a aimé ceci.
5 juin 2021 à 22 h 29
#3
Vegan Commie Hipster
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 7,888
Mentions "j'aime": 3,256
With Comtois leading ANA in scoring this year and outscoring Couture, Kreider, etc. he could go to arbitration and get about 5M$ pretty easily

Reinhart, Labanc, Bura, RStrome, etc. as precedent

An arbitrator would or did give them all similar $
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
5 juin 2021 à 22 h 30
#4
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,345
Mentions "j'aime": 25,263
Take out Comtois and Jarry and, since you don't have a 2021 first, add Legare and your 2022 first. Understand that we'd probably prefer you to say No, thanks. We actually think that we'll be contenders again before Gibson's six years are up.
5 juin 2021 à 22 h 30
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,193
Mentions "j'aime": 18,359
Double the Coleman salary. And Seattle isn’t taking Zucker.
Radu47 a aimé ceci.
5 juin 2021 à 22 h 37
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 82
Mentions "j'aime": 13
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Take out Comtois and Jarry and, since you don't have a 2021 first, add Legare and your 2022 first. Understand that we'd probably prefer you to say No, thanks. We actually think that we'll be contenders again before Gibson's six years are up.


I can respect someone saying no, that you may be contenders again before Gibson's deal is up, and that fact that it is unlikely Anaheim would deal Comtois, BUT...saying Guentzel, Marino, Legare, and a 2022 1st for Gibson is absolutely ridiculous. Gibson is good, and wouldn't be cheap to acquire, but, he's not going to pull in 4 premium assets either.
Radu47 a aimé ceci.
5 juin 2021 à 22 h 40
#7
Vegan Commie Hipster
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 7,888
Mentions "j'aime": 3,256
I guess it's sorta like the uncertainty of what Pittsburgh do after Jarry/DeSmith vs. the certainty of Gibson being solid but likely underwhelming

Maybe a contending and defensively solid team can revitalize his currently kinda stagnating career right now? Seems definitely possible. Idk.

I'd say worth a chance- could turn out nicely
FLPensFan a aimé ceci.
5 juin 2021 à 22 h 43
#8
Vegan Commie Hipster
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 7,888
Mentions "j'aime": 3,256
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Double the Coleman salary. And Seattle isn’t taking Zucker.


Yeah seems almost certainly Bluegs

Unless something really crazy happens

Like protecting Tanev

😳

They're not gonna protect Tanev. Right? Right??
FLPensFan a aimé ceci.
5 juin 2021 à 22 h 50
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 82
Mentions "j'aime": 13
Quoting: Radu47
Yeah seems almost certainly Bluegs

Unless something really crazy happens

Like protecting Tanev

😳

They're not gonna protect Tanev. Right? Right??


It's funny. There were a lot of Pittsburgh fans angry with 6 years at 3.5M AAV for Tanev when we signed him. I can see that a bit without knowing the player. After coming here and playing for 2 years, he's worth every penny. Just because Pittsburgh is using him on the 4th doesn't mean he is a 4th liner. He probably should be getting at least 3rd line minutes, and I wouldn't even be opposed to him playing with Crosby to open up some space for him, kind of like Kunitz did several years ago.

Pittsburgh better protect him. After trading Hornqvist, Tanev is kind of the heart and soul of the team. Gives 110% every night.
5 juin 2021 à 22 h 50
#10
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,345
Mentions "j'aime": 25,263
Quoting: FLPensFan
I can respect someone saying no, that you may be contenders again before Gibson's deal is up, and that fact that it is unlikely Anaheim would deal Comtois, BUT...saying Guentzel, Marino, Legare, and a 2022 1st for Gibson is absolutely ridiculous. Gibson is good, and wouldn't be cheap to acquire, but, he's not going to pull in 4 premium assets either.


Just out of curiosity, what do you think Semyon Varlamov would cost? Only two premium assets?

People consistently fail to understand what premium goaltenders are worth because they're never traded -- precisely because they're too expensive.
5 juin 2021 à 23 h 19
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 82
Mentions "j'aime": 13
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Just out of curiosity, what do you think Semyon Varlamov would cost? Only two premium assets?

People consistently fail to understand what premium goaltenders are worth because they're never traded -- precisely because they're too expensive.


Varlamov is tough, because he's 6 years older than Gibson, and signed for 4 less years. On the plus side, he's got better playoff numbers, and his deal is cheaper than Gibson. If Varlamov was a UFA this summer, he'd probably be able to ask for 7-8M AAV easy.

If I was Pittsburgh making an offer for Varlamov, probably Legare, the 2022 1st, and a younger, lesser player with upside like Jared McCann. And I fully believe that is likely not enough to get it done, either. If Pittsburgh had a better prospect pool, I'd expect they would need to offer a better prospect.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage