Quoting: Boomer125
We're not even talking about Lindholm ( it's unreasonable to even add him the trade) but your original comment stated Marner isn't worth Tkchuck alone which simply isn't true. 0 in 17 is unacceptable. But Marner at this point has produced significantly better than Tkchuck in the playoffs is true he has produced 25 pts in 32 GP. As for the "bloated" contract Tkchuk at his production is considered bloated and his contract is up in a year and he'll make at minimum 9 million on a 1 year deal follows by free agency where he could walk.
For starters there is almost a 0% chance that he walks from the Flames, Treliving is a wizard with contract negotiations idk why people think that this is a good point, it isn't. The last big free agent to walk was John Tavares and that was a while ago. By that logic, Matthews could walk too at the end of his deal so you see why that's a bad argument.
Yes in terms of overall stats Marner has outproduced Tkachuk but you're looking at stats without taking context into account, Marner is your best playmaker and is expected to score at that kind of a rate, he plays on a line with Matthews. Tkachuk plays a much more balanced game which is ideal for the playoffs because the refs swallow their whistles and he gets into the face of the opposition, very similarly to Brad Marchand (Toronto has a lot of experience watching him so you should really get that).
Again idk what you're expecting a rookie to do in a lopsided matchup against one of the stingiest and frankly dirtiest teams of all time in the Anaheim Ducks, but you are right it does still count but once again you're not looking at context. If i'm the Flames, this is the easiest trade to say no to, the only player id even consider losing Tkachuk for is Jack Eichel, and that's it.