SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Draft Thots

Créé par: JumboFett
Équipe: 2021-22 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 16 avr. 2021
Publié: 16 avr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Let's say SJ wins 2OA, but wants to increase their chances of draft success, so they trade down. NJD is holding the 6OA... let the improv begin.

I think we pick Brandt Clarke 6OA, then Sebastian Cossa and Ayrton Martino with the two 2nds.

SJ fans, lemme know who you like.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 250 000 $
21 250 000 $
2750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
33 000 000 $
31 500 000 $
1750 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (NYI)
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (NJD)
Détails additionnels:
6OA, 26OA
NJD
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
Détails additionnels:
2OA
2.
SJS
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (OTT)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
OTT
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (NYI)
3.
TOR
  1. Gambrell, Dylan [Droits de RFA]
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de NJD
Logo de OTT
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de TOR
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de BUF
Logo de SJS
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $64 635 363 $0 $425 000 $16 864 637 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 108 696 $2 108 696 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
796 667 $796 667 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
16 avr. 2021 à 17 h 47
#1
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,905
Mentions "j'aime": 5,888
See’s “Draft Thots”

Its a bold strategy, let's see if it pays off for them.
16 avr. 2021 à 17 h 53
#2
Ban Price trades
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 6,482
Mentions "j'aime": 6,455
Wanna finish filling out your roster so I don't need to move this to the SJS subforum? I don't want to immediately dust this because you have some trades here for a hypothetical scenario but neither the discussion or title are wholly relevant to the rest of the AGM. Just something we've been asked to keep an eye on.

In terms of actual discussion, I'll refer to this source: https://bluebulletreport.com/2020/10/05/2020-nhl-draft-rankings/

The #2 pick has a value of 87.31. The combination of picks #6 and #26 (based on where NYI is in the standings by points percentage today) has a value of 59.93. The Sharks are being cheated of value equivalent to the #10 pick here. I'm not particularly sure how New Jersey bridges that gap without Ty Smith or Holtz.

Secondly, the Sharks - should they have pick #2 - only stand to benefit with the quality of prospect available to them. Any of Beniers, Clarke, Eklund, Guenther, Hughes, Power, or Wallstedt would be phenomenal picks for this organization. I don't think San Jose stands to gain much by trading back here. Just take whomever management deems is the BPA and start accumulating pieces for a long rebuild. If anything, a defender taken this year should have more than enough time to over-ripen and be NHL ready by the time the Sharks are done accumulating top picks.
16 avr. 2021 à 18 h 14
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 17,101
Mentions "j'aime": 12,123
Assuming the standings stay roughly the same, I don't think it would make much sense for Ottawa to do that. The difference between a late 1st (26th in this case), and Ottawa's own 2nd (33rd) is pretty negligible. Definitely not worth an additional 2nd, and probably not really worth moving up at all.
16 avr. 2021 à 18 h 25
#4
MartysBetter
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 787
Mentions "j'aime": 181
I don't think the value is super unfair but doubtful NJ is interested. From what GM Tom Fitzgerald has hinted at the Islanders pick might be used as a trade piece for a ready now player since the team wants to compete next year. Only way I'd do the trade is if VAN picks above NJ and below SJS. I want Luke Hughes and I really don't want him in VAN.
16 avr. 2021 à 18 h 59
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 374
Mentions "j'aime": 168
Quoting: MartysBetter29
I don't think the value is super unfair but doubtful NJ is interested. From what GM Tom Fitzgerald has hinted at the Islanders pick might be used as a trade piece for a ready now player since the team wants to compete next year. Only way I'd do the trade is if VAN picks above NJ and below SJS. I want Luke Hughes and I really don't want him in VAN.


Given we've won 2 in our last 10, we won't be picking at 6OA. Odds look like we'll end up at 1-3OA so you'll have a crack at Power or Hughes.
MartysBetter29 a aimé ceci.
16 avr. 2021 à 19 h 32
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 1,421
Mentions "j'aime": 313
Quoting: BeterChiarelli
Wanna finish filling out your roster so I don't need to move this to the SJS subforum? I don't want to immediately dust this because you have some trades here for a hypothetical scenario but neither the discussion or title are wholly relevant to the rest of the AGM. Just something we've been asked to keep an eye on.

In terms of actual discussion, I'll refer to this source: https://bluebulletreport.com/2020/10/05/2020-nhl-draft-rankings/

The #2 pick has a value of 87.31. The combination of picks #6 and #26 (based on where NYI is in the standings by points percentage today) has a value of 59.93. The Sharks are being cheated of value equivalent to the #10 pick here. I'm not particularly sure how New Jersey bridges that gap without Ty Smith or Holtz.

Secondly, the Sharks - should they have pick #2 - only stand to benefit with the quality of prospect available to them. Any of Beniers, Clarke, Eklund, Guenther, Hughes, Power, or Wallstedt would be phenomenal picks for this organization. I don't think San Jose stands to gain much by trading back here. Just take whomever management deems is the BPA and start accumulating pieces for a long rebuild. If anything, a defender taken this year should have more than enough time to over-ripen and be NHL ready by the time the Sharks are done accumulating top picks.


Sure, no problem.

Also, thanks for that pick value insight.
BeterChiarelli a aimé ceci.
16 avr. 2021 à 19 h 45
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,833
Mentions "j'aime": 18,585
I don't think there is a huge difference between #2 and #6...at least not big enough to lose that second 1st pick.

Just going by consensus rankings, I think I'd rather have 6/26 over 2.

Consensus Rankings
1. Matty Beniers
2. Owen Power
3. Luke Hughes
4. William Eklund
5. Dylan Guenther
6. Brandt Clarke
7. Kent Johnson
8. Jesper Wallstedt
9. Simon Edvinssson
10. Fabian Lysell
11. Aatu Raty
12. Chaz Lucius
13. Cole Sillinger
14. Oskar Olausson
15. Simon Robertsson
16. Carson Lambos
17. Xavier Bourgault
18. Nikita Chibrikov
19. Mason MacTavish
20. Zachary L'Heureux
21. Stanislav Svozil
22. Francesco Pinelli
23. Matt Coronato
24. Logan Stankoven
25. Zachary Bolduc
26. Isak Rosen
27. Zach Dean
28. Sebastian Cossa
29. Daniil Chayka
30. Corson Ceulemans
31. Sam Tuomaala
32. Fyodor Svechkov
16 avr. 2021 à 19 h 48
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,833
Mentions "j'aime": 18,585
Quoting: BeterChiarelli
Wanna finish filling out your roster so I don't need to move this to the SJS subforum? I don't want to immediately dust this because you have some trades here for a hypothetical scenario but neither the discussion or title are wholly relevant to the rest of the AGM. Just something we've been asked to keep an eye on.

In terms of actual discussion, I'll refer to this source: https://bluebulletreport.com/2020/10/05/2020-nhl-draft-rankings/

The #2 pick has a value of 87.31. The combination of picks #6 and #26 (based on where NYI is in the standings by points percentage today) has a value of 59.93. The Sharks are being cheated of value equivalent to the #10 pick here. I'm not particularly sure how New Jersey bridges that gap without Ty Smith or Holtz.

Secondly, the Sharks - should they have pick #2 - only stand to benefit with the quality of prospect available to them. Any of Beniers, Clarke, Eklund, Guenther, Hughes, Power, or Wallstedt would be phenomenal picks for this organization. I don't think San Jose stands to gain much by trading back here. Just take whomever management deems is the BPA and start accumulating pieces for a long rebuild. If anything, a defender taken this year should have more than enough time to over-ripen and be NHL ready by the time the Sharks are done accumulating top picks.


The draft pick value charts don't really work for NHL trades at this point in draft since there are so few picks traded in top-10.
There are too few comps - and drafts vary year to year at top of the list.
They hold weight when you get to later rounds.
But picks in top half of 1st round are rarely moved.
16 avr. 2021 à 20 h 10
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 1,421
Mentions "j'aime": 313
Quoting: NHLfan10506
I don't think there is a huge difference between #2 and #6...at least not big enough to lose that second 1st pick.

Just going by consensus rankings, I think I'd rather have 6/26 over 2.

Consensus Rankings
1. Matty Beniers
2. Owen Power
3. Luke Hughes
4. William Eklund
5. Dylan Guenther
6. Brandt Clarke
7. Kent Johnson
8. Jesper Wallstedt
9. Simon Edvinssson
10. Fabian Lysell
11. Aatu Raty
12. Chaz Lucius
13. Cole Sillinger
14. Oskar Olausson
15. Simon Robertsson
16. Carson Lambos
17. Xavier Bourgault
18. Nikita Chibrikov
19. Mason MacTavish
20. Zachary L'Heureux
21. Stanislav Svozil
22. Francesco Pinelli
23. Matt Coronato
24. Logan Stankoven
25. Zachary Bolduc
26. Isak Rosen
27. Zach Dean
28. Sebastian Cossa
29. Daniil Chayka
30. Corson Ceulemans
31. Sam Tuomaala
32. Fyodor Svechkov


TBH, if SJ does win 2OA, and Beniers isn't taken 1OA, I'd definitely keep the pick and take him. Matty Beniers has a style that looks like a combo of Patty Marleau and Logan Couture.
16 avr. 2021 à 20 h 17
#10
MartysBetter
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 787
Mentions "j'aime": 181
Quoting: DevilsFanInTX
Given we've won 2 in our last 10, we won't be picking at 6OA. Odds look like we'll end up at 1-3OA so you'll have a crack at Power or Hughes.


Yes pls. I'd be thrilled with either of those players.
16 avr. 2021 à 20 h 18
#11
Ban Price trades
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 6,482
Mentions "j'aime": 6,455
Quoting: NHLfan10506
The draft pick value charts don't really work for NHL trades at this point in draft since there are so few picks traded in top-10.
There are too few comps - and drafts vary year to year at top of the list.
They hold weight when you get to later rounds.
But picks in top half of 1st round are rarely moved.


Those pick values take data from every draft since the league expanded to 30 teams iirc so like they are considering historical data to an extent.

I think the last point you made is key here: the last top-10 pick I remember being moved was the pick used to select Lias Anderson.
16 avr. 2021 à 20 h 37
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,833
Mentions "j'aime": 18,585
Quoting: BeterChiarelli
Those pick values take data from every draft since the league expanded to 30 teams iirc so like they are considering historical data to an extent.

I think the last point you made is key here: the last top-10 pick I remember being moved was the pick used to select Lias Anderson.


Yes, I was talking really about pick(s)-for-pick(s) swaps.
Other leagues see plenty of them, and NHL sees a lot in later rounds, but few in top-10
Over recent drafts here is the highest pick exchanged in pick-for-pick scenario....
(last top-10 was in 2008 when Isles dropped back twice)

2020: 19
2019: 11
2018: 22
2017: 26
2016: 11
2015: 24
2014: 20
2013: 18
2012: 14
2011: 22
2010: 15
2009: 12
2008: 5
17 avr. 2021 à 2 h 45
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 2,406
Mentions "j'aime": 319
Leafs decline. They like Kerfoot.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage