SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Johnny HAAAACKKY

Créé par: Maximporebski
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 25 mars 2021
Publié: 25 mars 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Raanta, Antti (2 125 000 $ retained)
2.
TOR
  1. Gaudreau, Johnny (2 000 000 $ retained)
CGY
  1. Abruzzese, Nick [Liste de réserve]
  2. Amirov, Rodion [Liste de réserve]
  3. Engvall, Pierre
  4. Hirvonen, Roni [Liste de réserve]
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
3.
TOR
  1. Jenner, Boone (1 875 000 $ retained)
  2. Savard, David (2 125 000 $ retained)
CBJ
  1. Anderson, Joey
  2. Dermott, Travis
  3. Liljegren, Timothy
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
  5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
4.
TOR
  1. Glendening, Luke (900 000 $ retained)
  2. Merrill, Jon
DET
  1. Hollowell, Mac
  2. Kerfoot, Alexander
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $78 288 116 $0 $0 $3 211 884 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 875 000 $1 875 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
900 000 $900 000 $
C, AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
-1 062 500 $-1 062 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
2 125 000 $2 125 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
25 mars 2021 à 10 h 5
#1
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18,294
Mentions "j'aime": 10,637
Overpay
palhal a aimé ceci.
25 mars 2021 à 10 h 7
#2
Démarrer sujet
DanyHeatley4allstar
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 299
Mentions "j'aime": 51
Quoting: Gmonwy
Overpay


for what
25 mars 2021 à 10 h 7
#3
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,563
Mentions "j'aime": 22,697
Big overpay to those US team, and then hoping those guys are NHL ready in 2 plus weeks. Overpay for Gaudreau for a position that really doesn't need that much help/
25 mars 2021 à 10 h 8
#4
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18,294
Mentions "j'aime": 10,637
Quoting: Maximporebski
for what


Gaudreau
25 mars 2021 à 10 h 11
#5
PlusMinus is stupid
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 7,319
Mentions "j'aime": 7,154
Detroit doesn't want those pieces. We'll take a 3rd for LGD from someone else.
fedorov91 et BStinson a aimé ceci.
25 mars 2021 à 10 h 11
#6
PULL A TAMPA IGNORE
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 2,563
Mentions "j'aime": 690
Come on man 4 trades for 6 players 5 retained on REALLY!!!!! Does everyone start thinking they're working for the leafs?
DeadWingsv2 a aimé ceci.
25 mars 2021 à 10 h 12
#7
Démarrer sujet
DanyHeatley4allstar
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 299
Mentions "j'aime": 51
Quoting: palhal
Big overpay to those US team, and then hoping those guys are NHL ready in 2 plus weeks. Overpay for Gaudreau for a position that really doesn't need that much help/


uhh well Dubas' main target is a top 6 winger so I think you are mistaken. Mikheyev is not a top 6 player on a good team, same with Thornton, same with Galchenyuk. The two U.S trades are adequate in value acquired and traded. How can the Leafs be competitive this deadline if they undervalue U.S based players because they miss 2 weeks? The two weeks doesn't matter, the playoffs do.
Gmonwy a aimé ceci.
25 mars 2021 à 10 h 14
#8
Démarrer sujet
DanyHeatley4allstar
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 299
Mentions "j'aime": 51
Quoting: TheThunder
Come on man 4 trades for 6 players 5 retained on REALLY!!!!! Does everyone start thinking they're working for the leafs?


Not sure if you know the current climate of the business of sports but with tight financial situations in many places, most GM's are expecting a money in/money out scenario, or else you will only see trades to LAK, OTT, NJD, and FLA. Retaining salary for 1.5 seasons does nothing to a non-competitive team. They receive more in return for salary retention, for cap space they won't even use.
25 mars 2021 à 10 h 17
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 380
Mentions "j'aime": 192
Wings will take a 3rd for LGD and a 4th for Merrill. No retention on LGD and you can keep your other pieces
DeadWingsv2 et TheThunder a aimé ceci.
25 mars 2021 à 10 h 20
#10
Démarrer sujet
DanyHeatley4allstar
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 299
Mentions "j'aime": 51
Quoting: fedorov91
Wings will take a 3rd for LGD and a 4th for Merrill. No retention on LGD and you can keep your other pieces

Not retaining 900k on a salary cap that has a lot of room? Wings fans are blessed that you're not in charge. You get more assets for retaining salary cap, and I'm pretty sure the Wings need future assets quite badly. Hollowell is a mid tear prospect, Kerfoot is still young and can likely play 2C in DET, or at least 2LW. LGD for Kerfoot is equal. Hollowell for Merril is equal, and tossing a fourth for LGD retention makes sense. Dubas would likely need to chip in SDA instead of a fourth, or maybe a third instead, but the concept makes sense.
25 mars 2021 à 10 h 23
#11
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,563
Mentions "j'aime": 22,697
Quoting: Maximporebski
uhh well Dubas' main target is a top 6 winger so I think you are mistaken. Mikheyev is not a top 6 player on a good team, same with Thornton, same with Galchenyuk. The two U.S trades are adequate in value acquired and traded. How can the Leafs be competitive this deadline if they undervalue U.S based players because they miss 2 weeks? The two weeks doesn't matter, the playoffs do.


Quoting: Maximporebski
uhh well Dubas' main target is a top 6 winger so I think you are mistaken. Mikheyev is not a top 6 player on a good team, same with Thornton, same with Galchenyuk. The two U.S trades are adequate in value acquired and traded. How can the Leafs be competitive this deadline if they undervalue U.S based players because they miss 2 weeks? The two weeks doesn't matter, the playoffs do.


Is a top six LW a main target? Could be, but please don't believe what a GM says publicly. But it's not 2 weeks. It's over two weeks as the player first have to arrive in Canada before the two weeks starts. Being in a hotel room, not being in game shape, doesn't mean an instant return against NHL opponents. But the fact is all the players are just meh players....at least year and aren't better than the players they are replacing. Is this version of Savard better than Bogosian? Jenner is not a good centre, but he can be good, though not this year at LW. Raanta on IR.
25 mars 2021 à 10 h 24
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 380
Mentions "j'aime": 192
Quoting: Maximporebski
Not retaining 900k on a salary cap that has a lot of room? Wings fans are blessed that you're not in charge. You get more assets for retaining salary cap, and I'm pretty sure the Wings need future assets quite badly. Hollowell is a mid tear prospect, Kerfoot is still young and can likely play 2C in DET, or at least 2LW. LGD for Kerfoot is equal. Hollowell for Merril is equal, and tossing a fourth for LGD retention makes sense. Dubas would likely need to chip in SDA instead of a fourth, or maybe a third instead, but the concept makes sense.


The red wings have way larger contracts then LGD that we need to retain on. So we will be retaining on them instead is the reason, it's not that we are opposed to it. We will get a 3rd for him regardless of retention, 24 teams in a playoff race right now want him. So thanks for letting me know how blessed the wings are for not having me bud.

Merrill will get us a 4th for depth dman and low salary at the deadline.

Kerfoot you can keep, we have no use for him nor want that cap hit unless you pay us to take him.

Don't care about the ahl guy who will be a 4th liner at best or never make the nhl

3rd + 4th gets you lgd and merrill or no deal and we get those assets elsewhere
DeadWingsv2 a aimé ceci.
25 mars 2021 à 10 h 24
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 380
Mentions "j'aime": 192
Quoting: Maximporebski
Not retaining 900k on a salary cap that has a lot of room? Wings fans are blessed that you're not in charge. You get more assets for retaining salary cap, and I'm pretty sure the Wings need future assets quite badly. Hollowell is a mid tear prospect, Kerfoot is still young and can likely play 2C in DET, or at least 2LW. LGD for Kerfoot is equal. Hollowell for Merril is equal, and tossing a fourth for LGD retention makes sense. Dubas would likely need to chip in SDA instead of a fourth, or maybe a third instead, but the concept makes sense.


The red wings have way larger contracts then LGD that we need to retain on. So we will be retaining on them instead is the reason, it's not that we are opposed to it. We will get a 3rd for him regardless of retention, 24 teams in a playoff race right now want him. So thanks for letting me know how blessed the wings are for not having me bud.

Merrill will get us a 4th for depth dman and low salary at the deadline.

Kerfoot you can keep, we have no use for him nor want that cap hit unless you pay us to take him.

Don't care about the ahl guy who will be a 4th liner at best or never make the nhl

3rd + 4th gets you lgd and merrill or no deal and we get those assets elsewhere
BStinson a aimé ceci.
25 mars 2021 à 10 h 26
#14
Démarrer sujet
DanyHeatley4allstar
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 299
Mentions "j'aime": 51
Quoting: palhal
Is a top six LW a main target? Could be, but please don't believe what a GM says publicly. But it's not 2 weeks. It's over two weeks as the player first have to arrive in Canada before the two weeks starts. Being in a hotel room, not being in game shape, doesn't mean an instant return against NHL opponents. But the fact is all the players are just meh players....at least year and aren't better than the players they are replacing. Is this version of Savard better than Bogosian? Jenner is not a good centre, but he can be good, though not this year at LW. Raanta on IR.


Raanta is scheduled to be back before the deadline anyways. Jenner is a playoff type of player because he plays very physical, its what the Leafs need on that third line. The quarantine rule sucks, but its something you have to do to make this team go from great to elite.
25 mars 2021 à 10 h 32
#15
Démarrer sujet
DanyHeatley4allstar
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 299
Mentions "j'aime": 51
Quoting: fedorov91
The red wings have way larger contracts then LGD that we need to retain on. So we will be retaining on them instead is the reason, it's not that we are opposed to it. We will get a 3rd for him regardless of retention, 24 teams in a playoff race right now want him. So thanks for letting me know how blessed the wings are for not having me bud.

Merrill will get us a 4th for depth dman and low salary at the deadline.

Kerfoot you can keep, we have no use for him nor want that cap hit unless you pay us to take him.

Don't care about the ahl guy who will be a 4th liner at best or never make the nhl

3rd + 4th gets you lgd and merrill or no deal and we get those assets elsewhere


Okay agreed. Leafs would pitch Kerfoot, Hollowell, and a third for LGD and Merril. Thats with 900k retained on LGD for the rest of the year. You can also flip Kerfoot in the offseason for assets, because he will be given more ice time on the Wings. Seems like a decent investment for a player that has some talent, and plays really hard. He also is a good penalty killer.
fedorov91 a aimé ceci.
25 mars 2021 à 10 h 36
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 380
Mentions "j'aime": 192
Quoting: Maximporebski
Okay agreed. Leafs would pitch Kerfoot, Hollowell, and a third for LGD and Merril. Thats with 900k retained on LGD for the rest of the year. You can also flip Kerfoot in the offseason for assets, because he will be given more ice time on the Wings. Seems like a decent investment for a player that has some talent, and plays really hard. He also is a good penalty killer.


We have staal, nemeth, bernier, helm all making double or more then LGD, we will need the retention for those players more then LGD. There is just way to big of a market for us to retain on such a low salary like LGD unless someone overpaid for it. You can just flip kerfoot elsewhere for assets since we don't need him. Trade him to someone who is in the playoffs and has cap space and needs a C, or use him as part of the granlund trade I keep hearing about, I'm sure Nashville could use a 3C. LGD and merrill for a 3rd and a 4th is fair for almost no salary going back the other way. 1.8 and 800k
DeadWingsv2 a aimé ceci.
25 mars 2021 à 10 h 37
#17
PlusMinus is stupid
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 7,319
Mentions "j'aime": 7,154
Quoting: Maximporebski
Okay agreed. Leafs would pitch Kerfoot, Hollowell, and a third for LGD and Merril. Thats with 900k retained on LGD for the rest of the year. You can also flip Kerfoot in the offseason for assets, because he will be given more ice time on the Wings. Seems like a decent investment for a player that has some talent, and plays really hard. He also is a good penalty killer.


You're missing the point, we are not going to retain on LGD at all, because we are going to use our limited number of retention trades on players with higher caphits (such as Staal, Helm, etc)
fedorov91 a aimé ceci.
25 mars 2021 à 10 h 38
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,803
Mentions "j'aime": 14,525
forgetting about trade values, does Toronto need to turn over 30% of its roster?
25 mars 2021 à 10 h 41
#19
PULL A TAMPA IGNORE
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 2,563
Mentions "j'aime": 690
Quoting: Maximporebski
Not sure if you know the current climate of the business of sports but with tight financial situations in many places, most GM's are expecting a money in/money out scenario, or else you will only see trades to LAK, OTT, NJD, and FLA. Retaining salary for 1.5 seasons does nothing to a non-competitive team. They receive more in return for salary retention, for cap space they won't even use.

Those teams charge a premium to retain and these aren't it !!
25 mars 2021 à 10 h 47
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2020
Messages: 4,742
Mentions "j'aime": 3,509
Quoting: Maximporebski
Not retaining 900k on a salary cap that has a lot of room? Wings fans are blessed that you're not in charge. You get more assets for retaining salary cap, and I'm pretty sure the Wings need future assets quite badly. Hollowell is a mid tear prospect, Kerfoot is still young and can likely play 2C in DET, or at least 2LW. LGD for Kerfoot is equal. Hollowell for Merril is equal, and tossing a fourth for LGD retention makes sense. Dubas would likely need to chip in SDA instead of a fourth, or maybe a third instead, but the concept makes sense.

Glendening’s remaining cap is less than 700k and will be lower at TDL so retaining 50% is minimal and those 3 retention slots would be better used on larger contracts (eg Nemeth, Bernier, Helm, Flip). Hollowell has no value to Detroit as he’s a RHD that would never see ice time here as were deep at RD and Yzerman has traded away Regula to clear the logjam. Kerfoot is overpaid in the current NHL for his role as we’ve seen comparable centers like Haula sit on the market and sign for roughly half of his AAV nor does he play 2C over Fabbri even on Detroit. If you want to structure the deal without Kerfoot it would make more sense for Detroit.
fedorov91 a aimé ceci.
25 mars 2021 à 11 h 29
#21
Go leafs go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 13,248
Mentions "j'aime": 9,194
Quoting: DeadWingsv2
Detroit doesn't want those pieces. We'll take a 3rd for LGD from someone else.


Quoting: fedorov91
Wings will take a 3rd for LGD and a 4th for Merrill. No retention on LGD and you can keep your other pieces


I mean, you're getting a 4th (don't think Merrill's worth that but that's besides the point) and Kerfoot+Hollowell is worth a 3rd easy. Frankly I don't see a reason for Detroit to turn it down.
Maximporebski a aimé ceci.
25 mars 2021 à 11 h 37
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 380
Mentions "j'aime": 192
Quoting: Saskleaf
I mean, you're getting a 4th (don't think Merrill's worth that but that's besides the point) and Kerfoot+Hollowell is worth a 3rd easy. Frankly I don't see a reason for Detroit to turn it down.


Cause we aren't retaining and have no interest in kerfoot or a c prospect. I don't know why this is complicated

LGD with no retention for a 3rd

Merrill for a 4th

That's the deal that's it
25 mars 2021 à 11 h 43
#23
PlusMinus is stupid
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 7,319
Mentions "j'aime": 7,154
Quoting: Saskleaf
I mean, you're getting a 4th (don't think Merrill's worth that but that's besides the point) and Kerfoot+Hollowell is worth a 3rd easy. Frankly I don't see a reason for Detroit to turn it down.

Because we don't want Kerfoot, or Hollowell, we want decent picks and/or impact players. Even your 3rd is a low 3rd and I don't see that pick having a ton of potential as turning into something valuable anyways. I can see an argument that Merrill might not return a 4th in this season, since he's a bottom pairing guy. We're also not going to retain on LGD. Make it LGD(no retention) and Merrill for a 3rd and a 5th and I'd take that deal. If you want us to take Kerfoot off your hands as a throw in to offset some salary, fine, we'll take him I guess, but that's a throw away to us, not an asset.
25 mars 2021 à 11 h 53
#24
Go leafs go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 13,248
Mentions "j'aime": 9,194
Quoting: fedorov91
Cause we aren't retaining and have no interest in kerfoot or a c prospect. I don't know why this is complicated

LGD with no retention for a 3rd

Merrill for a 4th

That's the deal that's it


Quoting: DeadWingsv2
Because we don't want Kerfoot, or Hollowell, we want decent picks and/or impact players. Even your 3rd is a low 3rd and I don't see that pick having a ton of potential as turning into something valuable anyways. I can see an argument that Merrill might not return a 4th in this season, since he's a bottom pairing guy. We're also not going to retain on LGD. Make it LGD(no retention) and Merrill for a 3rd and a 5th and I'd take that deal. If you want us to take Kerfoot off your hands as a throw in to offset some salary, fine, we'll take him I guess, but that's a throw away to us, not an asset.


Ok, the leafs would rather keep Kerfoot and Hollowell anyways because they are valuable assets. LGD and Merrill for a 3rd and a 5th would work.
25 mars 2021 à 12 h 33
#25
Démarrer sujet
DanyHeatley4allstar
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 299
Mentions "j'aime": 51
Quoting: Saskleaf
Ok, the leafs would rather keep Kerfoot and Hollowell anyways because they are valuable assets. LGD and Merrill for a 3rd and a 5th would work.


Truth is that Kerfoot is better than both players, but his cap fit does not fit in Toronto's plans. Hollowel is worth the same as Merril. LGD is worth less than Kerfoot, but comparing the contracts would allow Detroit to not give up assets in return. The retention would land Detroit a 3rd or a 4th, or a prospect equivalent like SDA or Dmitri Ovechnikov.
Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage