SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Our D-core would be stacked

Créé par: Gmonwy
Équipe: 2020-21 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 9 mars 2021
Publié: 9 mars 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Untill we lose one to Seattle
Transactions
CGY
  1. Dumba, Matt
Détails additionnels:
I know I know, Wild weren't willing to do this during the summer why would they do it now Blah Blah Blah. This isn't real its trying something
MIN
  1. Monahan, Sean
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (CGY)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de EDM
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2023
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $68 976 666 $0 $457 500 $12 523 334 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 425 000 $2 425 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
875 000 $875 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Flames de Calgary
787 500 $787 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
9 mars 2021 à 21 h 36
#1
Hop on the Slaftrain
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 16,188
Mentions "j'aime": 20,503
I'd thank the Wild for not doing tbh. Substracting at center to add at defense does not make the Flames better.
Gmonwy a aimé ceci.
9 mars 2021 à 21 h 38
#2
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 813
Mentions "j'aime": 142
I mean they weren't even interested before season started. Don't know if sean Monahan has issues, or analytics is playing to Guerin decision, but he didn't trade for trocheck either. There was a report Toronto was interested, & at one point ask was nylander, but at some point Guerin walked away.

I remember reading back to trocheck trade last deadline that Guerin wasn't interested in trading dumba for nylander. Whether it was or work by Guerin, who knows
9 mars 2021 à 21 h 39
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,892
Mentions "j'aime": 2,794
I kinda like the idea but I think the Wild would need to get a better future out of the deal here. Say a 1st or Pelletier, obviously they’d add but IDK what.

I think Monahan fits better than some people think with Fiala and it would allow Ek to play with KK and Zuccarello. It puts Rossi into a position of playing his way into the top 6 and then Monahan could get a nice asset or 2 if he was dealt after next year. All this is in addition to the easier expansion plan and less term on his contract. It’s not as crazy as people make it out to be.
9 mars 2021 à 21 h 51
#4
Speak of the Devil
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 23,938
Mentions "j'aime": 26,436
Seattle is going to have a fun time picking a defenseman from Calgary
9 mars 2021 à 21 h 54
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 813
Mentions "j'aime": 142
Quoting: jnowariak
I kinda like the idea but I think the Wild would need to get a better future out of the deal here. Say a 1st or Pelletier, obviously they’d add but IDK what.

I think Monahan fits better than some people think with Fiala and it would allow Ek to play with KK and Zuccarello. It puts Rossi into a position of playing his way into the top 6 and then Monahan could get a nice asset or 2 if he was dealt after next year. All this is in addition to the easier expansion plan and less term on his contract. It’s not as crazy as people make it out to be.


Every wild fan wants Monahan, or trocheck. I am just very curious what / does the front office know that they aren't sharing?

Truly baffling how when Monahan name came up, Russo said yeah, that's not happening.

Is it analytics? Character, Lockeroom?
9 mars 2021 à 21 h 59
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 9,527
Mentions "j'aime": 8,968
i don’t think this happens pre-expansion draft and if it did calgary certainly isn’t the one adding
Gmonwy a aimé ceci.
9 mars 2021 à 22 h 2
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 5,352
Mentions "j'aime": 3,387
Quoting: Alfie11
i don’t think this happens pre-expansion draft and if it did calgary certainly isn’t the one adding


This certainly doesn't happen post-expansion draft.
9 mars 2021 à 22 h 2
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 5,352
Mentions "j'aime": 3,387
Quoting: jnowariak
I kinda like the idea but I think the Wild would need to get a better future out of the deal here. Say a 1st or Pelletier, obviously they’d add but IDK what.

I think Monahan fits better than some people think with Fiala and it would allow Ek to play with KK and Zuccarello. It puts Rossi into a position of playing his way into the top 6 and then Monahan could get a nice asset or 2 if he was dealt after next year. All this is in addition to the easier expansion plan and less term on his contract. It’s not as crazy as people make it out to be.


No one's making it out to be crazy or acting like Monahan wouldn't help short term. You just don't trade for an asset that you're know you're going to be moving on from in a year if you're not going to be a legit contender in that year. Monahan isn't going to win us a Cup next year, so instead of taking on a depreciating asset for your depreciating asset, you flip your own depreciating asset for appreciating assets, and you're better off long term. You're going to get better future pieces for Dumba this year than you will for Monahan next year.
9 mars 2021 à 22 h 4
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,892
Mentions "j'aime": 2,794
Quoting: BrodinCheerD
Every wild fan wants Monahan, or trocheck. I am just very curious what / does the front office know that they aren't sharing?

Truly baffling how when Monahan name came up, Russo said yeah, that's not happening.

Is it analytics? Character, Lockeroom?


Monahan isn’t the no brainer guy you move Dumba for, especially when he was at his lowest value. Monahan is a good top 6 center that can play net front with a playmaker like Gaudreau and is dependent on that player. I’d guess that’s the hold up more than anything else, aside from the fact that it didn’t clear any cap space. My light reading into Monahan is that he isn’t a great 200 ft player and maybe that played into the rumors but there are a lot of reasons to like Monahan on the Wild.
9 mars 2021 à 22 h 19
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 38
Mentions "j'aime": 14
Quoting: Devil1122
Seattle is going to have a fun time picking a defenseman from Calgary


Unless the take Bennet. 🤷🏻‍♂️
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage