SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Changes

Créé par: Coleharborcrosby
Équipe: 2020-21 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 15 févr. 2021
Publié: 15 févr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Pretty clear Pens are going for it for one more year. Burke and Hextall are clear in what they want to do with this team.

A Bennett trade seems very likely. His value isn`t high. A 2nd plus an Alberta guy who plays RW could get it done. If a prospect or another player like Riikola is required then so be it but I don`t think it`s off by much.

MP for TD. TD is the superior player. Burke has said the only way to trade for him is if you trust the leadership group to take him in and force him to play into a strong culture. Sidney Crosby and the Penguins are the people to do that. If they retain I would do this trade. I would probably do it without retention but the Pens are the ones with leverage. Make it happen. Pair him with Dumo to keep him in line and allow him to flourish offensively.

I don`t know if there is anything true about the Gibson rumors but if there is something there then go for it. Some of the trades on here for a 1st, Guentzel, Marino + are ridiculous. Yes, he is a great goalie but the trade value for goalies are not high. Letang, becomes their best player. Jarry is still a really good young goalie and we throw in a pick on top of it all. Also take back a contract in Backes who won`t crack a full healthy lineup. *IF* the Ducks are entertaining a trade for Gibson then I think this is more what it would look like. Also for anyone saying Letang does not have value then don`t both commenting. He is still an elite defenceman and will remain so for many years.
Transactions
1.
PIT
  1. Deangelo, Anthony (2 400 000 $ retained)
2.
CGY
  1. Sceviour, Colton
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
3.
PIT
  1. Backes, David (1 000 000 $ retained)
  2. Gibson, John
ANA
  1. Jarry, Tristan
  2. Letang, Kris
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (PIT)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2023
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $76 970 000 $0 $1 062 500 $4 530 000 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 940 000 $2 940 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
UFA - 7
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD, C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
733 333 $733 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
15 févr. 2021 à 14 h 25
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 7,990
Mentions "j'aime": 4,211
Anaheim declines, but New York takes that!
15 févr. 2021 à 14 h 42
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 1,218
Mentions "j'aime": 230
Quoting: Nhl_oilers
Anaheim declines, but New York takes that!


No we do not, how many times does this have to be said, buying out DeAngelo only costs 300k. Not worth retaining half his salary and Rangers dont need a defesnemen on a 5 year contract blocking their prospects
15 févr. 2021 à 14 h 55
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 7,990
Mentions "j'aime": 4,211
Quoting: TheDime99
No we do not, how many times does this have to be said, buying out DeAngelo only costs 300k. Not worth retaining half his salary and Rangers dont need a defesnemen on a 5 year contract blocking their prospects


What good prospects do you have that plays left side besides K’Andre Miller? Schneider is right, and Lundkvist is right also.
15 févr. 2021 à 15 h 36
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 1,218
Mentions "j'aime": 230
Quoting: Nhl_oilers
What good prospects do you have that plays left side besides K’Andre Miller? Schneider is right, and Lundkvist is right also.


Tarmo Reunanen, although not known well could have easily made the team this season and Zac Jones is a big question mark. But the bigger problem is that bring in Petterson means that either Lindgren, Miller or himself has to play on the third pair. And considering the way the lines are set he would be on the third pair so its not worth it paying 4M for a player that will be glued to the 3rd pair.
15 févr. 2021 à 16 h 3
#5
Rangers 2023
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 19,043
Mentions "j'aime": 5,430
Modifié 15 févr. 2021 à 20 h 54
Quoting: TheDime99
Tarmo Reunanen, although not known well could have easily made the team this season and Zac Jones is a big question mark. But the bigger problem is that bring in Petterson means that either Lindgren, Miller or himself has to play on the third pair. And considering the way the lines are set he would be on the third pair so its not worth it paying 4M for a player that will be glued to the 3rd pair.


Forgetting matthew robertson too
TheDime99 a aimé ceci.
15 févr. 2021 à 18 h 12
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
penguins laugh at the rangers trade. We might give the rangers Matheson....might. He's playing well.
15 févr. 2021 à 20 h 53
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 1,218
Mentions "j'aime": 230
Quoting: Ragsandbluesfan
Forgetting matthews robertson too


I knew I was forgetting someone I just couldn't figure out who
15 févr. 2021 à 21 h 22
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 2,149
Mentions "j'aime": 367
Quoting: pharrow
penguins laugh at the rangers trade. We might give the rangers Matheson....might. He's playing well.


DeAngelo>MP
15 févr. 2021 à 21 h 23
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 2,149
Mentions "j'aime": 367
Quoting: TheDime99
Tarmo Reunanen, although not known well could have easily made the team this season and Zac Jones is a big question mark. But the bigger problem is that bring in Petterson means that either Lindgren, Miller or himself has to play on the third pair. And considering the way the lines are set he would be on the third pair so its not worth it paying 4M for a player that will be glued to the 3rd pair.


Does it make sense to pay a player even more money to not play at all

Also none of those guys are anything close to MP...
16 févr. 2021 à 2 h 15
#10
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: ChampEddy
DeAngelo>MP


You don't have to pay to get DeAngelo #facts
16 févr. 2021 à 10 h 11
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 2,149
Mentions "j'aime": 367
Quoting: pharrow
You don't have to pay to get DeAngelo #facts


You have to pay for retention though.

Another option then is to trade MP for futures and then get DeAngelo for something else.
16 févr. 2021 à 14 h 44
#12
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,481
Mentions "j'aime": 25,380
I don't think that you understand the difference between a player signed for 6 years after this season (Gibson) versus 1 year after this season (Letang).
16 févr. 2021 à 15 h 10
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 2,149
Mentions "j'aime": 367
Quoting: OldNYIfan
I don't think that you understand the difference between a player signed for 6 years after this season (Gibson) versus 1 year after this season (Letang).


This trade would obviously only happen if Letang wanted to go to the Ducks and would sign an extension.
16 févr. 2021 à 15 h 12
#14
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: ChampEddy
You have to pay for retention though.

Another option then is to trade MP for futures and then get DeAngelo for something else.


no you don't. If you want TD just wait you'll get him for nothing soon.
The best option is to just not trade MP. How's that for starters. MP is fine. He's not the problem and moving him doesn't help the team.
They need to move Matheson eventually. That's the real issue.
16 févr. 2021 à 15 h 24
#15
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 2,149
Mentions "j'aime": 367
Quoting: pharrow
no you don't. If you want TD just wait you'll get him for nothing soon.
The best option is to just not trade MP. How's that for starters. MP is fine. He's not the problem and moving him doesn't help the team.
They need to move Matheson eventually. That's the real issue.


If Matheson plays the way he has in the past couple games I would much rather have him than MP.
16 févr. 2021 à 15 h 25
#16
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: ChampEddy
If Matheson plays the way he has in the past couple games I would much rather have him than MP.


yeah and that right there is where we are done because you been drinking draino.
That contract needs to move. MP>Matheson.
16 févr. 2021 à 15 h 50
#17
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 2,149
Mentions "j'aime": 367
Quoting: pharrow
yeah and that right there is where we are done because you been drinking draino.
That contract needs to move. MP>Matheson.


Give it 10 games.

Already it is Matheson on 2nd pair and MP on 3rd.
16 févr. 2021 à 15 h 57
#18
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: ChampEddy
Give it 10 games.

Already it is Matheson on 2nd pair and MP on 3rd.


I think Matheson is a decent player. But it's not the player it's the contract. Given he can also bottom out, you move it.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage