SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Clearing bad contracts

Créé par: truculence67
Équipe: 2021-22 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 11 févr. 2021
Publié: 12 févr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
2825 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
2800 000 $
2750 000 $
2750 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
44 000 000 $
33 750 000 $
12 000 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Wallstedt, Jesper
3925 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
VAN
  1. Burns, Brent
Détails additionnels:
Seattle Expansion
2.
SJS
FLA
  1. Donato, Ryan [Droits de RFA]
3.
MTL
  1. Meloche, Nicolas
  2. Viel, Jeffrey
  3. Choix de 6e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
4.
VAN
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $63 283 696 $0 $725 000 $18 216 304 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 108 696 $2 108 696 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
836 667 $836 667 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
825 000 $825 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 1
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
12 févr. 2021 à 10 h 24
#1
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,784
Mentions "j'aime": 22,818
Sorry, Burns just can't be wished away. Better ways for Seattle to spend 8m
OutCold13 a aimé ceci.
12 févr. 2021 à 10 h 25
#2
Go Hawks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 235
Mentions "j'aime": 49
I don't get the point because you got Burns out but then you sign Mrasek and Gusev who combined make the same money. And you signed all your young players to one year deals so you are going to be in trouble next year anyway and the team still sucks.
12 févr. 2021 à 10 h 33
#3
Brace for the Storm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 12,840
Mentions "j'aime": 6,647
Quoting: LucasVollmer09
I don't get the point because you got Burns out but then you sign Mrasek and Gusev who combined make the same money. And you signed all your young players to one year deals so you are going to be in trouble next year anyway and the team still sucks.


Because Mrazek fixes a huge hole in the lineup?

Agreed on Gusev tho, dude's got no consistency
12 févr. 2021 à 10 h 33
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,553
Mentions "j'aime": 6,453
Not sure if Habs make this move but it is interesting. Meloche seems like a good addition to play behind Weber and Petry. Truchon-Viel could be an interesting middle 6 winger scored a lot of goals in Q but it has not converted to the AHL yet. Both have decent size, It is an interesting idea.
12 févr. 2021 à 10 h 37
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,230
Mentions "j'aime": 615
Easy no from Florida
12 févr. 2021 à 10 h 56
#6
Hockey Fan13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 3,919
Mentions "j'aime": 2,489
I don't see Seattle just taking Burns off the Sharks hands without a bribe. If I'm the Sharks looking to bribe a team to take a bad contract I'm probably dumping Vlasic, but that would probably require giving up the next 3 1st round picks, I really see that becoming the ugliest buyout in NHL history, as you have done here.
As far as the other moves, I don't love the signings. I don't think a buyout of Jones is a good idea especially if you have cap space and a Vlasic buyout at the same time. He has been ok this year and seems to give you only slightly below average goaltending when paired with another somewhat competent goalie.
Virtanen is worth a look for a 3rd but he is probably just more of the same as what Sharks have in the AHL. IMO Sharks need to move out what ever term they can bring up some of the guys from the AHL and see what they got. Hopefully guys will play well and the Sharks can trade off some of the redundant pieces for slightly higher picks and draft some young stars. It will take some luck.
12 févr. 2021 à 11 h 43
#7
Go Hawks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 235
Mentions "j'aime": 49
Quoting: KakkoForMauriceRichardAward
Because Mrazek fixes a huge hole in the lineup?

Agreed on Gusev tho, dude's got no consistency


Mrasek is ok for me because if a team is so good they won't need a higher end goalie. I think they could go back to Jones because he's been good this year, you get him for cheap, and improve on the rest of the team. Forget about Gusev tho
12 févr. 2021 à 21 h 12
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 2,771
Mentions "j'aime": 1,386
VAN decline, they probably want another player looking for a change of scenery (Bennett)
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage