SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

2015 Draft Redo

Créé par: Carter_chevy
Équipe: 2020-21 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 10 févr. 2021
Publié: 10 févr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
2.
3.
4.
BOS
    Would've traded away
    5.
    BOS
      Would not have signed
      6.
      BOS
      1. Donato, Ryan
      Détails additionnels:
      Reverse Trade
      Rachats de contrats
      Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
      Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
      2021
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de TOR
      2022
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de BOS
      2023
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de BOS
      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
      2281 500 000 $81 284 894 $964 222 $2 407 500 $215 106 $
      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
      Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
      7 142 857 $7 142 857 $
      AG
      UFA - 6
      Logo de Islanders de New York
      7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
      C, AD
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
      AD
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
      AG
      NMC
      UFA - 5
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
      C
      M-NTC, NMC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      769 167 $769 167 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
      AD, C
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      1 498 925 $1 498 925 $
      AG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
      AG, C, AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
      AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      1 275 000 $1 275 000 $
      C, AG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
      AD, C
      UFA - 3
      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 8
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
      DG
      UFA - 4
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      2 250 000 $2 250 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 250 000 $$1M)
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      850 000 $850 000 $
      DG/DD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      1 250 000 $1 250 000 $ (Bonis de performance750 000 $$750K)
      DD
      UFA - 1
      Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
      AG, AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 3
      Équipe de réserve
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      850 000 $850 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
      AG, C
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      800 000 $800 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
      DD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
      C, AG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
      AG, AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Bruins de Boston
      725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
      AD
      UFA - 2

      Code d'intégration

      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

      Texte intégré

      Cliquer pour surligner
      10 févr. 2021 à 11 h 53
      #1
      Grierless Sharks Fan
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: déc. 2017
      Messages: 2,997
      Mentions "j'aime": 937
      Coyle would be going back to MIN, right? Also, wasn't Donato 2014 Draft?
      10 févr. 2021 à 11 h 57
      #2
      Isles555
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2020
      Messages: 1,012
      Mentions "j'aime": 589
      The weekly post is here!
      bhavikp27 et Carter_chevy a aimé ceci.
      10 févr. 2021 à 12 h 45
      #3
      Banni
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2017
      Messages: 4,561
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,266
      Quoting: Isles555
      The weekly post is here!


      Yep. Ill debunk it right now dont worry.

      Quoting: goodfella
      Coyle would be going back to MIN, right? Also, wasn't Donato 2014 Draft?


      Yeah but they bruins traded Donato to the wild for Coyle so he is just reverting it

      @Carter_chevy This is totally wrong. Stop doing these, but if you are gonna do them, do it right.
      Zboril and Chabot were equally rated going into the draft. So Zboril was the correct pick at the time. He is also playing well rn so just hold your horses and we will see how he does now that he is getting a chance
      Debrusk was rated HIGHER than Conner. So not only was it the right pick at the time, but debrusk is panning out just fine as a top 6 winger. No problem there.
      The ONLY ONE that makes sense is Barzal over Senyshyn. After picking two players to adress their needs (LHD and LW sniper), it made the most sense to take the BEST PLAYER LEFT ON THE BOARD, especially cuz Barzal was supposed to go top 10. So that is fine, and consequently they would NOT have traded for Coyle, BUT THEY WOULD KEPT KREJCI.
      So doing these is dumb over, but at least do it right
      10 févr. 2021 à 13 h 20
      #4
      Serf
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2016
      Messages: 3,417
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,461
      Keep these coming, I have lots of room on my ignore list
      10 févr. 2021 à 13 h 34
      #5
      Démarrer sujet
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2017
      Messages: 347
      Mentions "j'aime": 84
      Quoting: sensibleguy
      Keep these coming, I have lots of room on my ignore list


      Ok ill tag you in the next one!
      10 févr. 2021 à 13 h 35
      #6
      Démarrer sujet
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2017
      Messages: 347
      Mentions "j'aime": 84
      Quoting: Silkysmooth42
      Yep. Ill debunk it right now dont worry.



      Yeah but they bruins traded Donato to the wild for Coyle so he is just reverting it

      @Carter_chevy This is totally wrong. Stop doing these, but if you are gonna do them, do it right.
      Zboril and Chabot were equally rated going into the draft. So Zboril was the correct pick at the time. He is also playing well rn so just hold your horses and we will see how he does now that he is getting a chance
      Debrusk was rated HIGHER than Conner. So not only was it the right pick at the time, but debrusk is panning out just fine as a top 6 winger. No problem there.
      The ONLY ONE that makes sense is Barzal over Senyshyn. After picking two players to adress their needs (LHD and LW sniper), it made the most sense to take the BEST PLAYER LEFT ON THE BOARD, especially cuz Barzal was supposed to go top 10. So that is fine, and consequently they would NOT have traded for Coyle, BUT THEY WOULD KEPT KREJCI.
      So doing these is dumb over, but at least do it right


      It doesnt matter where they were projected its how they turned out now
      10 févr. 2021 à 13 h 52
      #7
      Démarrer sujet
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2017
      Messages: 347
      Mentions "j'aime": 84
      Quoting: Isles555
      The weekly post is here!


      yessir!
      10 févr. 2021 à 13 h 57
      #8
      Banni
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2017
      Messages: 4,561
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,266
      Quoting: Carter_chevy
      It doesnt matter where they were projected its how they turned out now


      If you are doing how they turned out, then you dont need to revert any trades because its not trying to be realistic anyway so who cares about reverting trades.
      If you wanted to revert trades and make it realistic, thats when you do a REAL redraft where to say what they actually shoulda done
      10 févr. 2021 à 13 h 59
      #9
      Démarrer sujet
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2017
      Messages: 347
      Mentions "j'aime": 84
      Quoting: Silkysmooth42
      If you are doing how they turned out, then you dont need to revert any trades because its not trying to be realistic anyway so who cares about reverting trades.
      If you wanted to revert trades and make it realistic, thats when you do a REAL redraft where to say what they actually shoulda done


      I reverted trades to be under the cap
      10 févr. 2021 à 15 h 37
      #10
      Bcarlo25
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2018
      Messages: 21,807
      Mentions "j'aime": 7,175
      How original. Never seen one of these before. 🙄

      If this was what it took to get donato off the bruins roster, well worth it.
      Carter_chevy a aimé ceci.
      10 févr. 2021 à 17 h 27
      #11
      Démarrer sujet
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2017
      Messages: 347
      Mentions "j'aime": 84
      Quoting: Bcarlo25
      How original. Never seen one of these before. 🙄

      If this was what it took to get donato off the bruins roster, well worth it.


      I had fun making it
       
      Répondre
      To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
      Question:
      Options:
      Ajouter une option
      Soumettre le sondage