SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Prospect Pyramid for LA Kings

Créé par: PuckLuck_77
Équipe: 2020-21 Kings de Los Angeles
Date de création initiale: 15 déc. 2020
Publié: 15 déc. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
For those of you who are unsure of what it is, it is simply a way of ranking prospects in tier levels rather than individual level. In other words, each tier represents a certain potential for the prospects. Tiers 1-3 will be for-sure NHL'ers in my opinion, ranging in impact. Tiers 4-5 I see little chance of NHL time.

I tried to rank them in my personal order within each tier. So my example is I rank Gabe Vilardi higher than Turcotte, personally. I also tried to take into account NHL-readiness. This explains why I have Grundstrom so high. While I think Grans, Madden, Thomas, etc are higher potentials overall, Grundstrom is closer to the NHL and seems to have a role carved out next year.

Tier 1 = LW -- Superstar/Elite level prospect
Tier 2 = C -- Top line or Elite 2nd line potential/ Really good Top 4 Dman
Tier 3 = RW -- Bottom 6 (Ranging from Pretty Good 3rd liner to consistent ice time 4th liner)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tier 4 = LD -- Needs to do more to prove they can carve out some NHL time. Not likely
Tier 5 = RD -- Won't see NHL time in my opinion.
Tier 6 = G -- Goalie rankings

I'm going off of NHL rookie rules to make the list. Combination of age or certain amounts of games played = not listed. I took exception for Cal Peterson since he's 26 but is just about to get his real shot at starting in net this year.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3800 000 $
3800 000 $
3800 000 $
3800 000 $
3800 000 $
3800 000 $
3800 000 $
3800 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Frais de résiliation
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de STL
Logo de LAK
Logo de TOR
Logo de LAK
Logo de CGY
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2022
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2023
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
3881 500 000 $67 526 851 $0 $3 560 000 $13 973 149 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 4
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
795 000 $795 000 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
925 000 $925 000 $
C
RFA - 4
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 4
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
925 000 $925 000 $
C
RFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
RFA
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
795 000 $795 000 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
RFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
RFA
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
800 000 $800 000 $
C
RFA
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
747 500 $747 500 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
C, AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
761 666 $761 666 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance125 000 $$125K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
825 833 $825 833 $
DD
RFA - 4
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
700 000 $700 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
858 333 $858 333 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
809 166 $809 166 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
796 667 $796 667 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
705 556 $705 556 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
735 000 $735 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
800 000 $800 000 $
G
RFA
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AG, AD
RFA
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
735 000 $735 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
818 333 $818 333 $ (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
G
RFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
RFA
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
700 000 $700 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
786 667 $786 667 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
733 333 $733 333 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
800 000 $800 000 $
AD
RFA
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
800 000 $800 000 $
AD
RFA
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
791 667 $791 667 $
C
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
15 déc. 2020 à 12 h 50
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,024
Mentions "j'aime": 1,017
I think Faber can jump a tier still in a year or two, great pick by GM Blake!
PuckLuck_77 et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
15 déc. 2020 à 12 h 55
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 2,374
Mentions "j'aime": 2,266
Quoting: NLidstrom
I think Faber can jump a tier still in a year or two, great pick by GM Blake!


Here's to hoping. Defense is where the Kings are "thin" comparatively with regards to their prospect pool. It would be great if Faber could become a no-doubt top-4 player. I still have full confidence he'll make the NHL, though, which is why I have him in Tier 3.
tryger, OldNYIfan et NLidstrom a aimé ceci.
15 déc. 2020 à 12 h 57
#3
Bad Take Bot v1.02
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 2,696
Mentions "j'aime": 1,888
I'd move up Grans.
PuckLuck_77, Radu47, tryger and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
15 déc. 2020 à 13 h 0
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 2,374
Mentions "j'aime": 2,266
Quoting: Klara
I'd move up Grans.


A tier or just within Tier 3? I tried to take NHL-readiness a little bit into account for my personal rankings, and I think Grans is still 3 years away personally. That's the only reason he's below a guy like Grundstrom. I think he'll need some time to adjust his defensive game, but when he does his overall ceiling is higher than a few on the list above him.
tryger et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
15 déc. 2020 à 13 h 5
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 6,674
Mentions "j'aime": 4,643
Quoting: PuckLuck_77
Here's to hoping. Defense is where the Kings are "thin" comparatively with regards to their prospect pool. It would be great if Faber could become a no-doubt top-4 player. I still have full confidence he'll make the NHL, though, which is why I have him in Tier 3.


I'm actually starting to think our defense is not as bad as we thought, once they get their top defensive line player there is a lot of options for that bottom 4:

2021 draft pick-Doughty
Bjornfot-Grans
Hutton-Spence
Anderson-Roy
Klague-Faber
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
15 déc. 2020 à 13 h 5
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,800
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Your tiers are so wide. Why would an elite first liner be the same tier as a borderline second liner
15 déc. 2020 à 13 h 15
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 514
Mentions "j'aime": 373
Grans is tier 2 I think he’ll be good for you guys, if only he fell one more slot frown
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
15 déc. 2020 à 13 h 19
#8
Bahston Brewins
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 893
Mentions "j'aime": 259
very interesting and doesn't seem like there's much bias. great post. I would maybe even have a couple players jump a tier- guys like Fagemo to tier 2 or Madden to tier 2. I can see why you might be kind of skeptical of Madden though due to size, but Fagemo is a very interesting prospect. Overall though, this is solid. LA's prospect pool is probably my favorite in the whole NHL
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
15 déc. 2020 à 13 h 28
#9
Bad Take Bot v1.02
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 2,696
Mentions "j'aime": 1,888
Quoting: PuckLuck_77
A tier or just within Tier 3? I tried to take NHL-readiness a little bit into account for my personal rankings, and I think Grans is still 3 years away personally. That's the only reason he's below a guy like Grundstrom. I think he'll need some time to adjust his defensive game, but when he does his overall ceiling is higher than a few on the list above him.


I'd move to Tier 2.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
15 déc. 2020 à 13 h 55
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 2,374
Mentions "j'aime": 2,266
Quoting: papishark
Your tiers are so wide. Why would an elite first liner be the same tier as a borderline second liner


Sorry if my description was tough to read. Tier 2 isn't "elite first liner", for me. It's players who might play on the first line OR Elite 2nd liners. To me, "Elite" 1st liners are saved for tier 1 status.
OldNYIfan et papishark a aimé ceci.
15 déc. 2020 à 13 h 56
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 2,374
Mentions "j'aime": 2,266
Quoting: nalzugaray12
very interesting and doesn't seem like there's much bias. great post. I would maybe even have a couple players jump a tier- guys like Fagemo to tier 2 or Madden to tier 2. I can see why you might be kind of skeptical of Madden though due to size, but Fagemo is a very interesting prospect. Overall though, this is solid. LA's prospect pool is probably my favorite in the whole NHL


I know analysts like Pronman are salivating over Fagemo. I hope he proves me wrong, but I don't see a player that's more than a contributing 3rd line winger who can play up the lineup in the event of an injury. I still have yet to see Madden play at any pro level, so I don't want to overhype myself on him just yet. If he plays 2nd line minutes for the Kings, it'll be on the wing.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
15 déc. 2020 à 15 h 14
#12
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,930
Mentions "j'aime": 25,730
Quoting: tryger
I'm actually starting to think our defense is not as bad as we thought, once they get their top defensive line player there is a lot of options for that bottom 4:

2021 draft pick-Doughty
Bjornfot-Grans
Hutton-Spence
Anderson-Roy
Klague-Faber


Surely you meant Hults? (This is the kind of mental-hangover mis-key I would make.)
15 déc. 2020 à 15 h 17
#13
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,930
Mentions "j'aime": 25,730
Really well done. Very impressive.

I'm hoping Durzi and Chromiak get there, but I share your doubts about everyone else in Tiers 4 and 5.
15 déc. 2020 à 15 h 28
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 6,674
Mentions "j'aime": 4,643
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Surely you meant Hults? (This is the kind of mental-hangover mis-key I would make.)


He definitely should be in there, my biggest omission is Walker though which was just a brain fart.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage