PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
Historique des masses salariales
Compensation maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ODDS
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports d’entrée en vigueur du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports d’entrée en vigueur du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
ODDS
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
Historique des masses salariales
Compensation maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Odds Enabled
Swedenheim
Membre depuis
5 sept. 2020
Équipe favorite
Ducks d'Anaheim
Deuxième équipe favorite
Canucks de Vancouver
Messages dans les forums
514
Messages par jour
0.5
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
28 févr. à 4 h 6
Sujet:
New Day
So kind of those teams to do those deals with Toronto out of the kindness of their hearts.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
9 août 2021 à 18 h 20
Sujet:
Rakell to CAR
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caniac555</b></div><div>Forget about the conditional - why would the canes trade a decent prospect and two picks for a rental? He doesn’t re-sign with the Canes, he’s a veteran top 9 forward and will ask for more then they will pay. This is not a Canes move, maybe last year when he had an extra year of term.</div></div>
Cuz he makes goal horn go brrrr
Forum:
Armchair-GM
9 août 2021 à 17 h 20
Sujet:
Rakell to CAR
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caerii</b></div><div>There are no conditional picks for players re-signing anymore.</div></div>
When did that change? And Why?
Forum:
Anaheim Ducks
4 août 2021 à 0 h 17
Sujet:
Ducks vs Kings prospect pool would you rather
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>tkecanuck341</b></div><div>LA has the better prospect pool, and it's not particularly close.
At the top, the teams are roughly equivalent:
Byfield is a step above Zegras, but not by much.
Turcotte and Clarke are roughly equivalent to MacTavish and Drysdale.
After that is where LA starts to considerably outclass Anaheim. The second tier of offensive prospects includes the following guys:
LA: Kaliyev, Kupari, ****emo, Madden, Thomas, Bjornfot, Faber, Grans
Anaheim: Perreault, Zellweger
I left out guys like Simontival, Chromiak, and Spence that have been absolutely tearing it up in junior and international competitions due to their late draft positions, but those guys are looking like they will be quality adds as well. Everyone else in your list for both teams I would consider to be in a tier below the guys that I listed.
I will give Anaheim the edge in goaltending prospects, as Dostal looks like he could be a quality goaltender. The Kings best options in goal are Ingham and Parik, both of whom could turn into quality NHL goaltenders, but would probably be considered long shots.</div></div>
to be fair I feel like the Ducks second tier gets slept on hard, Thrun and Lacombe are both quality players along with Pastujov and Groulx
Forum:
Anaheim Ducks
3 août 2021 à 23 h 53
Sujet:
Ducks vs Kings prospect pool would you rather
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NLidstrom</b></div><div>I think the Ducks have the higher end top two guys (Zegras and Drysdale >>> Byfield and Clarke personally) but the Kings pool looks a little deeper to me.
Detroit isn’t in bad shape themselves. Seider, Raymond, Cossa, Edvinsson - but we’re further out than LA/ANA</div></div>
I feel like Detroit is probably on pace with ANA, other than zegras and Drysdale the ducks have to let a lot of the other guys cook for a year or two, similar to detroit.
Forum:
Anaheim Ducks
3 août 2021 à 23 h 34
Sujet:
Ducks vs Kings prospect pool would you rather
I did this last year to spark some discussion with some fellow socal hockey fans about the futures of these teams, and we came to seemingly two conclusions. 1. both teams seem to be building a pool of talent that can take them back to the playoffs, (the kings maybe about a year ahead), and 2. These teams will be great to see against each other in the playoffs in the future if we are lucky enough. The match ups are a mix of players with comparable playstyle, or projection, or narrative, or draft position, and obviously they aren't all perfect matches but its just for fun so whatever. also feel free to share who you think has a better prospect pool as a whole.
I would give the kings the slight edge
Forum:
Anaheim Ducks
3 août 2021 à 23 h 34
Sujet:
Ducks vs Kings prospect pool would you rather
I did this last year to spark some discussion with some fellow socal hockey fans about the futures of these teams, and we came to seemingly two conclusions. 1. both teams seem to be building a pool of talent that can take them back to the playoffs, (the kings maybe about a year ahead), and 2. These teams will be great to see against each other in the playoffs in the future if we are lucky enough. The match ups are a mix of players with comparable playstyle, or projection, or narrative, or draft position, and obviously they aren't all perfect matches but its just for fun so whatever. also feel free to share who you think has a better prospect pool as a whole.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 juin 2021 à 0 h 48
Sujet:
Im Back
Ducks accept
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 juin 2021 à 12 h 1
Sujet:
maybe this gets drury some respect
The issue with the Ducks trade stems from the fact that, if I’m not mistaken, not a single team has traded down from a top 5 pick in the cap era
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 juin 2021 à 23 h 53
Sujet:
Lindholm for 9OA is there a deal to be made
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Reason</b></div><div>It's definitely a possibility and I sure hope you are correct! I do like their core, I just have no faith in JB!
I do think they will be a playoff team possibly next year, more likely the year after, but I think they are 3-4 years away from competing with the likes of the AV's, TB, CAR etc.</div></div>
I think this team is gonna be somewhat like the Avs from a few years back, assuming smart decisions are made, where they are gonna prove next year they are a playoff team and shortly after start making noise in the post season. Maybe not to the extent that the Avs have but certainly not a team to sleep on.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 juin 2021 à 23 h 37
Sujet:
Lindholm for 9OA is there a deal to be made
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Reason</b></div><div>It would be more appealing. I definitely think Lindholm is worth a first plus, however if VAN is going to trade their first I am not sure Lindholm is the best fit for the team. The team needs D improvements but would prefer right side upgrades.
Concerns fit wise for VAN from my perspective would be:
VAN is still likely 3-4 years away from contending which would be pushing Lindholm into his 30's and likely into a state of decline.
VAN is high on Jack Rathbone becoming a solid top 4 LD in the very near future. With Hughes also playing the left side, VAN hopes to be set in this position for years to come.
VAN traded away their 1&2 round picks last year and don't appear to have a lot of future players coming in on ECL's. If they trade away top picks for players without some form of team control on team friendly deals, they could continue to have cap issues long term.
Greater need for improvement on the right side.
All that being said JB tried hard to acquire OEL last year, a desperation move in my opinion, and he is likely going to be even more desperate to improve the team this year, so I could definitely see him having interest, I would think VAN would probably have to add prospect though.</div></div>
Thank you for the insight and perspective, although I think I’d like challenge you on your position that they are 3-4 years from contention, I follow the Canucks somewhat closely as they are one of my favorite teams and I honestly think that with some smart decisions they could be only 1-2 years away from being a threat. They have plenty of forwards that in 2 years will be effective top 6 players. Petterson Miller Hoglander Podkolzin Boeser Horvat. And A number of D that can be effective in 2 years. Hughes Rathbone Schmidt and if Hamonic and Myers can play like top 4 Dmen just don’t always do. They also have a solid goalie in Demko. I think a presence like Lindholm would catapult them to a somewhat guaranteed playoff position next year given the division. Basically to surmise the Canucks are lucky in the fact that their issues have really nothing to do with their young core. It’s just getting a bit of luck and fixing up their bottom 6 and improving their D a bit that needs to be worked out. I think this would cover the latter. And worst case scenario you could have a left side on defense that guarantees a solid Dman is on the ice at any given moment similar to Tampa’s model.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 juin 2021 à 23 h 16
Sujet:
Lindholm for 9OA is there a deal to be made
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LeafsFanForSomeReason</b></div><div>Just on the topic of trade requests, what ever came of the reports that Troy Terry wanted a change of scenery? It kind of came out of nowhere and I never heard much follow up. Do you know what the situation is there/whether the Ducks might be willing to move him?</div></div>
I don’t think Terry requested a trade I thought the rumor was ANA may have been shopping him
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 juin 2021 à 22 h 56
Sujet:
Lindholm for 9OA is there a deal to be made
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>exo2769</b></div><div>Unless ANA knows something about Linholm that we don't, why would they trade away a bona-fide top pair dman for the attempt of a top pair dman? Did he ask to be traded?</div></div> nothing like a trade request, but he is a valuable piece that may not want to resign with the team given its current affairs. Also stuff like while he isn’t old he may not necessarily be in the right age window for the new core.
Basically this is all hypothetical
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 juin 2021 à 22 h 52
Sujet:
Lindholm for 9OA is there a deal to be made
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Reason</b></div><div>I like the player and their cap hit, however with only one year left before UFA I don't think this makes a lot of sense.
I think VAN would be better off to target a RD preferably a little bit younger and who has more years of team control.</div></div>
Theoretically Lindholm says he will sign a reasonable extension, does that make you cough up the pick and maybe more, Lindholm is certainly not young but he also certainly isn’t old and has a number of good years left in him
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 juin 2021 à 22 h 47
Sujet:
Lindholm for 9OA is there a deal to be made
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CMcAvoy73</b></div><div>If I’m anaheim i need more.</div></div>
I can certainly see that being a scenario, but Lindholm has been injured so who knows, I think at maximum it wouldn’t be a large add
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 juin 2021 à 22 h 5
Sujet:
Lindholm for 9OA is there a deal to be made
Lindholm is a bonafide top pair Dman but is he someone the Nucks would pay big for? Curious to see what others think and how this deal could be valued by each side
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 avr. 2021 à 15 h 24
Sujet:
Tampa Bay Lightning
Why even bother retaining a measly 2 dollars?!?!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 avr. 2021 à 19 h 29
Sujet:
ANA CHI
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Windjammer</b></div><div>Rakell and Manson aren't difference makers unfortunately.</div></div>
How are top 6 forwards and top 4 D not difference makers
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 avr. 2021 à 16 h 51
Sujet:
Go for broke
Also seems like a lot of moving parts for a team that is already decently successful
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 avr. 2021 à 16 h 50
Sujet:
Go for broke
Mansons price is higher than that, especially with retention
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 avr. 2021 à 16 h 10
Sujet:
Pierre Lebrun Trades
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caniac555</b></div><div>Pono is a solid middle six center prospect, who matches the way the Canes want to play. I’d hate to see him go, but it’s the type of move I could see happening if the Canes really wanted to get Manson.
I feel like the deal is much more like the deal the Leafs got for Mizzin...2 prospects and 2 picks (not a first)</div></div>
The canes have been noted to pay for who they want as of late, and he would really solidify that bottom pair and help clean up some of the guys that like to hang around the net that Carolina has had a bit of an issue with. It would be an overpay but with two playoffs runs at least under current contract for Manson it is one that could pay off
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 avr. 2021 à 16 h 0
Sujet:
leafs offseason
Is that Ducks trade for real?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
27 mars 2021 à 16 h 38
Sujet:
Manson Out
I’d rather just keep Manson, if his price is truly that low it really can only go up
Forum:
Armchair-GM
25 mars 2021 à 1 h 53
Sujet:
TDL Deals
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jah1722</b></div><div>That’s not what I got from Wheeler’s report. Also the ask for Ekholm is a top prospect a first and another piece. Lindholm should get at least that.</div></div>
Yeah Wheeler isn’t huge on him but a lot of other scouts are, I would still qualify him as a top prospect.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
25 mars 2021 à 1 h 51
Sujet:
garland
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Mrhankey426</b></div><div>6 mil is a little to much for garland id say around 5 is a better price for him.</div></div>
Im gonna disagree with you Garland is the real deal, he is a young player who is well rounded and is snifffing a point per game on the Yotes while maintaining shooting percentages and the such that would imply he is actually slightly underperforming what should be expect of him, and he has a bit of nastiness to to him, imo he would edge out Nylander as 4th best forward on the Leafs if he ended up there
1
2
Suivant
Page 1