SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Reversing one trade - Chicago Blackhawks

Créé par: SevenLeg
Équipe: 2020-21 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 29 oct. 2020
Publié: 30 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Here's the part VIII of that series. The goal is basically to see where each team would currently stand after reversing one bad or questionable trade, without reversing all the subsequent moves. Excuse me in advance for my grammar and syntax errors, feel free to correct me if needed.

The trade : Chicago Blackhawks Artemi Panarin and Tyler Motte and round 6 pick in the 2017 draft (Jonathan Davidsson) to Columbus Blue Jackets for Anton Forsberg, Brandon Saad and round 5 pick in the 2018 draft (Mike Callahan).

The context : The Blackhawks were still a powerhouse after winning three cups in five years with the same core. Russian import Artemi Panarin was added to that core after winning the Stanley Cup in 2015, winning the Calder the same year. However, due to their salary cap issues, Chicago GM Stan Bowman traded Panarin, mainly because he was set to be an unrestricted free agent at the end of his contract.

CHI's side : They acquired fan-favorite Brandon Saad, who was crucial in their 2013 and 2015 Stanley Cup wins. Anton Forsberg went on to play an handful games as a Blackhawk. Now, the current roster below looks far better with Panarin. They'd have a lethal top 6. Even if the defensive core and the goaltending look relatively weak, one of their offensive piece could be moved to fill those needs.

CBJ's side : The Jackets landed an offensive threat in Panarin, something they had been lacking since Rick Nash's departure, and a decent bottom 6 player in Tyler Motte, who was dealt to the Canucks shortly after. In 2019, after posting career-highs in both assists (59) and points (87) to date, Panarin and the Jackets squeaked into the postseason as the Eastern Conference’s second wild-card team, and eventually swept the Tampa Bay Lightning who were coming off one of the best regular seasons in the history of the game. Artemi Panarin left in free agency, but surely the Jackets don't regret doing that trade, as the success they had was largely due to Panarin and it's uncertain if they could have went this far with Brandon Saad.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 750 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
    Artemi Panarin
    Tyler Motte
    2017 6th round pick (NYI - #170 - Jonathan Davidsson)
    CBJ
      Brandon Saad
      Anton Forsberg
      2018 5th round pick (CBJ - #142 - Michael Callahan)
      2.
      3.
      4.
      CHI
      1. Callahan, Michael [Liste de réserve]
      ARI
      5.
      CHI
      1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (NYR)
      6.
      CHI
      1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2021 (DAL)
      Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
      Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
      2021
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de NYR
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de DAL
      Logo de CHI
      2022
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      2023
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      Logo de CHI
      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
      2381 500 000 $68 359 171 $1 090 244 $5 982 500 $13 140 829 $
      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
      C
      NMC
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Rangers de New York
      11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
      AG
      NMC
      UFA - 6
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
      C, AD
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
      AD
      NMC
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
      C, AG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
      C
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
      AD, AG
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      562 500 $562 500 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      950 000 $950 000 $
      C
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
      C, AD
      UFA - 2
      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
      DG
      NMC
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
      G
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
      DG/DD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
      DD
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      850 000 $850 000 $
      G
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
      DG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
      DD
      RFA - 3
      Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
      C
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
      DD
      NMC
      UFA - 4
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
      AD, C
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
      AG, C
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      725 000 $725 000 $
      DG/DD
      UFA - 1

      Code d'intégration

      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

      Texte intégré

      Cliquer pour surligner
      30 oct. 2020 à 13 h 23
      #1
      DaBus
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: sept. 2018
      Messages: 1,404
      Mentions "j'aime": 489
      Rather play Beaudin over Carlsson. I think Kurashev may have a chance to crack the lineup too
      SevenLeg a aimé ceci.
      30 oct. 2020 à 13 h 38
      #2
      Hawks Fan
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2019
      Messages: 2,652
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,677
      Sigh...
      SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
      30 oct. 2020 à 13 h 54
      #3
      Good Opinion Haver
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2018
      Messages: 1,837
      Mentions "j'aime": 939
      The lesson here is don't solve a problem before you need to. This didn't save the Hawks money in the present, and it cost them wins in the immediate two years following the trade. A baffling move if you are contending.

      Some day maybe GMs will learn. I doubt it though.
      SevenLeg et SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
      30 oct. 2020 à 13 h 57
      #4
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2015
      Messages: 551
      Mentions "j'aime": 398
      We’d be like 7 million over the cap and still not have a goalie lmao
      30 oct. 2020 à 14 h 0
      #5
      Démarrer sujet
      Hop on the Slaftrain
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: févr. 2019
      Messages: 16,188
      Mentions "j'aime": 20,503
      Quoting: thesaadfather
      We’d be like 7 million over the cap and still not have a goalie lmao


      They'll do some shenanigans with Seabrook on LTIR
      30 oct. 2020 à 14 h 11
      #6
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2020
      Messages: 9,284
      Mentions "j'aime": 2,971
      Seeing how Chicago couldn’t afford both wouldnt the Teuvo trade be the best reverse candidate here?
      30 oct. 2020 à 14 h 16
      #7
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2018
      Messages: 75
      Mentions "j'aime": 29
      You wouldnt have Zadorov on D. Since Saad would have never come back.
      SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
      30 oct. 2020 à 14 h 22
      #8
      Démarrer sujet
      Hop on the Slaftrain
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: févr. 2019
      Messages: 16,188
      Mentions "j'aime": 20,503
      Quoting: Jeeerrd
      You wouldnt have Zadorov on D. Since Saad would have never come back.


      Yeah I know but I said in the description that I only reverse one trade.
      30 oct. 2020 à 14 h 54
      #9
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2015
      Messages: 551
      Mentions "j'aime": 398
      Quoting: SevenLeg
      They'll do some shenanigans with Seabrook on LTIR


      Maybe down the line, but as of now he’s playing.
      31 oct. 2020 à 1 h 45
      #10
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2017
      Messages: 351
      Mentions "j'aime": 55
      The Panarin trade was definitely a year early, although I suppose Bowman was trying to maximize the return by trading him with 2 years left...except I'm not really sure he truly got the most possible. I always suspected that the trade was also to hopefully get Toews's line going offensively by bring back Saad since Hossa was starting to look like a bottom 6. At the time a cardboard cutout could score 20 goals with Kane banking in shots off him (as long as Anisimov remembered to bring the cutout in & out of the zone to avoid offside penalties of course). While Panarin & Kane were magic on ice, Kane also made it work with centers on their last legs like Richards and Handzus work.

      As far as shenanigans with Seabrook's contract and I do know many believe there are with Hossa's LTIR...the NHL does review the medicals on these players. We can speculate on how hard they squint in order to accept the LTIR. Reality is they are reviewed and I don't believe the league office particularly likes it when teams try to circumvent the cap. For example, they came up with the whole recapture penalty for contracts such as the one for Hossa's after they approved the contract.
       
      Répondre
      To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
      Question:
      Options:
      Ajouter une option
      Soumettre le sondage