SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

the sad state of this team

Créé par: newman23
Équipe: 2020-21 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 29 oct. 2020
Publié: 29 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
23 000 000 $
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $70 848 814 $1 090 244 $5 900 000 $10 651 186 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
562 500 $562 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
29 oct. 2020 à 0 h 46
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 14,042
Mentions "j'aime": 5,158
it's not bad tbh
Only the goaltending is a major issue
29 oct. 2020 à 0 h 56
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,351
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: GMs
it's not bad tbh
Only the goaltending is a major issue


It’s honestly deeper than that. The only reason it doesn’t seem bad is because on paper the team (offense only really) is very strong. However, behind the scenes, the team suffers from a poor playing style and our player development staff hasn’t done a great job of growing talent in the last five years.

That’s all without even bringing up the lack of a clear direction for the next few years. It’s not a rebuild cuz stan says we can still make the playoffs, but he also says we’re not good enough to compete, so which one is it?
GMs a aimé ceci.
29 oct. 2020 à 1 h 13
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 14,042
Mentions "j'aime": 5,158
Quoting: HatterTParty
It’s honestly deeper than that. The only reason it doesn’t seem bad is because on paper the team (offense only really) is very strong. However, behind the scenes, the team suffers from a poor playing style and our player development staff hasn’t done a great job of growing talent in the last five years.

That’s all without even bringing up the lack of a clear direction for the next few years. It’s not a rebuild cuz stan says we can still make the playoffs, but he also says we’re not good enough to compete, so which one is it?


in the middle like Montreal lol
29 oct. 2020 à 1 h 17
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,351
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: GMs
in the middle like Montreal lol


To be fair though, Montreal does have a clear direction and vision for their team though.
GMs a aimé ceci.
29 oct. 2020 à 1 h 34
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 1,108
Mentions "j'aime": 833
Quoting: HatterTParty
To be fair though, Montreal does have a clear direction and vision for their team though.


Not in the last 8 years ....
29 oct. 2020 à 2 h 5
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,351
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: drewjenkins
Not in the last 8 years ....


Sure, but at now it’s finally taking form. I’d even argue that you guys haven’t that bad for 8 years or even lacked a direction that whole time. You guys shoulda been in the 2014 cup final if it wasn’t for Kreider taking out price.
29 oct. 2020 à 2 h 56
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,296
Mentions "j'aime": 666
Quoting: HatterTParty
It’s honestly deeper than that. The only reason it doesn’t seem bad is because on paper the team (offense only really) is very strong. However, behind the scenes, the team suffers from a poor playing style and our player development staff hasn’t done a great job of growing talent in the last five years.

That’s all without even bringing up the lack of a clear direction for the next few years. It’s not a rebuild cuz stan says we can still make the playoffs, but he also says we’re not good enough to compete, so which one is it?


Weve done an ok job developing talents, its just there hasnt been enough talent to develop. Whens the last time stan traded a roster player for picks/prospects? He just downgrades our assets into oblivion. Saad became smith. Panarin became zadorov, crawford became nothing. Were in a rebuild but were drafting 17th overall but we finished 24th. Compared to last year where we shouldnt have been a playoff team, the offense is slightly worse maybe the same, defense is slightly better, and goaltending is significantly worse
29 oct. 2020 à 4 h 56
#8
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
for the life of me I don't get this teams decision making.
Why bring back Subban. He had a .890 save% last year and a .902 the year before. He's awful.
It's not like they didn't have a backup level goaltender in Delia.
They should have hit up CAR and taken Reimer off their hands or something.
They could have probably had him for next to nothing and it would at least be better than what they currently have.
29 oct. 2020 à 12 h 57
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 351
Mentions "j'aime": 55
I'm not certain I get the MTL love here, good young centers, but that D is about to get real old with Weber (signed at 7.8M through his age 41 season as a reminder) and Petry (33 in Dec, signed for 4 years at 6.25 after this season) and I'm not certain 13M+ for the next three seasons for goaltending is ideal. I do like a lot of what they have, I'm more confused by the "if only the Blackhawks had as good of a GM/direction on MTL' when I see a team with 3 long term 6M+ contracts for players in their 30's that I doubt will age well.
As far as the Blackhawks goaltending, I didn't get the Subban re-signing. I think they should have brought back Crow on the 2 year deal, let him be the #1 this year with 55-60 starts, and then do a tandem next year. As a fan I'm hoping the goaltending is surprisingly fine despite seeing it as potentially cratering the team if it's not.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage