Éditer l'avatar
  • png, jpeg
  • La grandeur minimale recommandée se veut de 800px par 800px
  • Grandeur maximale: 1MB
Glisser l'image pour repositionner
Sauvegarder
Annuler

drewjenkins

Membre depuis
30 mar 2017
Messages dans les forums
852
Messages par jour
0.52
Sujets de discussion
21
Forum: NHL Trades 5 sep à 0 h 31
Sujet: (MTL/ARI) - 2022 conditional 1st round pick and 2024 2nd round pick for Dvorak
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Kotkaniemi15</b></div><div>Sure, good trade I guess.

In a vacuum this is great for the habs. Dvorak is a great player, and is an upgrade on Danault offensively. The cost isn’t bad at all.

Now the issue is the fact that they lost Kotkaniemi to make this move, which makes it brutal for Montréal.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Kotkaniemi15</b></div><div>Neither this nor the Kuemper trade are overpayments.

It seems like people on this website really underrate Yotes players.</div></div>

Alex Kerfoot has better career statistics than Dvorak (both are in their mid 20's)

Alex Kerfoot has far better career even-strength statistics than Dvorak.

Alex Kerfoot had more even strength points than Dvorak last season.

Alex Kerfoot costs $1,000,000 less than Dvorak and gets no PP time.

Alex Kerfoot is as good or better than Dvorak in the defensive end.

<strong>Most people call Alex Kerfoot a bad #3C and a salary cap-dump.</strong>

Dvorak has never hit 40 points or 20 goals in five NHL seasons.
Forum: Armchair-GM 4 sep à 20 h 02
Sujet: This team is garbage
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Gofnut999</b></div><div>Kotko was garbage. Dvorak is better and cost controlled for 4 years. Canes did you a favor</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jpsnow13</b></div><div>Dvorak will be 2C at least.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Gofnut999</b></div><div>Better than you were a week ago though. 🤷🏻‍♂️</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OnFoenem34</b></div><div>bro what💀</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OnFoenem34</b></div><div>Kotkaniemi or Dvorak, the team is garbage, im also not a habs fan</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OnFoenem34</b></div><div>a guy whos never scored 20 goals or 40 points at 2C seems underwhelming</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jpsnow13</b></div><div>Well, it's better stats than KK who was going to be 2C anyway...</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jpsnow13</b></div><div>It's not about his draft rank anymore....

Dvorak is like the new Plekanec...</div></div>

<strong>Alex Kerfoot and Christian Dvorak have virtually identical career stats ... and they're only 16 months apart, both in their mid 20's.</strong>

<strong>And Kerfoot is just as good defensively and makes $1,000,000 less per season ... yet people call Kerfoot a bad #3C and a cap-dump.</strong>

<strong>That's the truth ... But I guess the silver lining is Dvorak only has to replace Kotkaniemi + Danault + a 2nd round pick. </strong>
Forum: Armchair-GM31 aoû à 16 h 34
Sujet: dvorak
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JaredOfLondon</b></div><div>That's about twice dvoraks worth</div></div>

<strong>Yes it is. </strong>


<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>The_Rocket</b></div><div>Dvorak is already on a pretty good contract and AZ is retaining on OEL already for the next 6 seasons. Not sure they have the appetite to retain 1 milk on Dvorak even if they are getting an overpayment in return</div></div>

<strong>Than don't massively overpay for him. </strong>


<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TMLBRIAN</b></div><div>retained 950k for 4 years adds to the value. Leafs give up a 1st (probably late) but get back a 2nd (probably mid to early). Kerfoot, who is solid, Dermott who would be given a bigger role and a top prospect in Robertson. It is a lot but they get 4 years of a guy entering in his prime, who would really help out on the wing and centre. He would compliment the core very well.</div></div>

<strong>Kerfoot is as valuable as Dvorak.
Robertson is as valuable as Dvorak.
Dermott is almost as valuable as Dvorak. </strong>


<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>palhal</b></div><div>Kerfoot and Dvorak have about the same on ice value.</div></div>

<strong>Yes they do.</strong>


<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JaredOfLondon</b></div><div>Oh i know, its still twice his value</div></div>

<strong>Yes it is. </strong>
Forum: NHL Signings16 aoû à 15 h 54
Sujet: Vancouver Canucks signed Jason Dickinson (3 Years / $2,650,000 AAV)
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CSStrowbridge</b></div><div>Have you never heard of healthy scratches? If a player is a healthy scratch, they still get paid at the NHL level and their salary is part of the salary cap. Teams need 23 players for their roster, otherwise they have to call people up every time there's an injury and they expose them to the waivers when going back down.</div></div>

1. You don't need to have 3 healthy scratches on your roster (it's a maximum not a requirement).

2. Toronto usually calls up non-waiver eligible guys or older guys that won't get claimed (it burned them twice last year with Boyd + Vesey).

3. The Marlies are already in Toronto so 'calling them up' is just a paper transaction that Toronto completes as needed.

4. Dubas has been doing this for the past 2 seasons (Toronto has more internal transactions than any other team).

5. Toronto would have been over the cap with a 23 man roster last year, but still saved up $3,000,000 for the trade deadline.

<strong>It is what it is man. </strong>
Forum: NHL Signings16 aoû à 14 h 44
Sujet: Vancouver Canucks signed Jason Dickinson (3 Years / $2,650,000 AAV)
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>pharrow</b></div><div>A. I hate to break it to you but TOR depth sucks.
It sucked last year, it sucks this year. So I have no idea what you are talking about "take the lead"
second, You can keep trying to get around the fact that TOR is vastly more top heavy all day with "deal with it brotha" comments. But TOR is far more top heavy. Which was the WHOLE POINT.
Why are you even still arguing it? Can you not just admit that paying 3 players an average of about 11 mil per, is clearly heavier and most likely going to be significantly heavier?
Are you that jealous of VAN that you can't admit that. I'm not even a VAN fan and I can clearly see this is true.
TOR fans are just obsessed. It's like you are all blind to reality. You are paying a lot of money at the top. A lot. More than probably any team in the league in their top 4 players. But here you are...."other teams are top heavy"
Even EDM paying McDavid and Drai is less top heavy. That's the biggest contract in the league. Maybe TB is close. I mean it's hard to find a team in the league as top heavy as TOR.</div></div>

Deal with it brotha.
Forum: NHL Signings16 aoû à 14 h 37
Sujet: Vancouver Canucks signed Jason Dickinson (3 Years / $2,650,000 AAV)
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CSStrowbridge</b></div><div>They are over the cap. They can't sign anyone... Because they are over the cap.

Uhhh... What? Seriously, what are you talking about? You don't think they will have a 23-man roster on opening night?</div></div>

Team's only dress 20 players for hockey games man.

Every team has to have a compliant 23 man roster for a moment in time before the season starts.

The Leafs can already do that by re-arranging their current players on paper.

They did the same thing last year when the season started.

<strong>Example:</strong>

Sending down Kase on paper (or anyone above $1,150,000) saves $1,150,000 in cap-space.

Then you replace them with someone making $750,000 and you save $400,000.

Do this with 3 players and the Leafs are under the cap for compliance.

The play a 21 man roster and sub for injuries when necessary.

Pretty standard stuff for cap-ceiling teams.
Forum: NHL Signings15 aoû à 18 h 55
Sujet: Vancouver Canucks signed Jason Dickinson (3 Years / $2,650,000 AAV)
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>pharrow</b></div><div>none of that has anything to do with anything about being top heavy.
You just realize that your math is way off, your comment was off, and now it's excuse time.
TOR is top heavy. Period. VAN hardly. The 5th-13th being better is neither here nor their. Being top heavy isn't about the talent level on the ice. It's about salary cap structure.
So why bother getting into some pissing contest over who's players are better. The fact that you had to go 13 deep to get there basically says, he down to the 4th line and 3rd pairing VAN pays more! Like WTF cares. That has nothing to do with being top heavy. Top 6 Top 4 Goalie you got 11. So you got most the 3rd line. It's basically the 4th line up. That's depth spending.

Clearly TOR has a better player in Matthews. But you're pushing your luck in saying Marner is. One could also argue that the Matthews contract sucks due to the length. So lets not pretend TOR did some great job in their top. They didn't. They over paid a lot. Almost no one wants that Marner contract. JT to 35 isn't exactly great and something teams probably don't want to hold onto.
If they were that much better than VAN how come those VAN players won a playoff round in the last 2 years and TOR has not?</div></div>

The break even is at 7-8 players for each team .... the top 7-8 contracts + buyouts next season are roughly equal between Toronto and Vancouver.

Toronto then begins to take the lead as you slide down the depth ....

<strong>Deal with it brotha. </strong>
Forum: NHL Signings15 aoû à 16 h 15
Forum: NHL Signings15 aoû à 11 h 33
Sujet: Vancouver Canucks signed Jason Dickinson (3 Years / $2,650,000 AAV)
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>pharrow</b></div><div>It's a decent deal for VAN.
I think people on here are wanting to hand guys way to much money. Pettersson isn't even a PPG player. But people wanting to throw him insane money. He is close to a 30 goal guy though if not already one. But he has some injury issues. My guess is he goes in the 7s.
Hughes on the other hand. You take away the PP and his game really suffers. 64% starts in the Ozone and a 50% corsi. But people want to hand him 8-9 million. Are you kidding me. He shouldn't get that. My guess is 5-6 range is a fair value. He's a one trick pony. His corsi sucks, he's bleeding goals against in even strength play and 5v5 play. He's just not a very complete defenseman at this point. People are too obsessed with points and not looking at the whole player.</div></div>

Tell their agents bro.