Éditer l'avatar
  • png, jpeg
  • La grandeur minimale recommandée se veut de 800px par 800px
  • Grandeur maximale: 1MB
Glisser l'image pour repositionner
Sauvegarder
Annuler

drewjenkins

Membre depuis
30 mar 2017
Messages dans les forums
852
Messages par jour
0.52
Sujets de discussion
21
Forum: NHL Trades 5 sep à 0 h 31
Forum: Armchair-GM 4 sep à 20 h 02
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Gofnut999</b></div><div>Kotko was garbage. Dvorak is better and cost controlled for 4 years. Canes did you a favor</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jpsnow13</b></div><div>Dvorak will be 2C at least.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Gofnut999</b></div><div>Better than you were a week ago though. 🤷🏻‍♂️</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OnFoenem34</b></div><div>bro what💀</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OnFoenem34</b></div><div>Kotkaniemi or Dvorak, the team is garbage, im also not a habs fan</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OnFoenem34</b></div><div>a guy whos never scored 20 goals or 40 points at 2C seems underwhelming</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jpsnow13</b></div><div>Well, it's better stats than KK who was going to be 2C anyway...</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jpsnow13</b></div><div>It's not about his draft rank anymore....

Dvorak is like the new Plekanec...</div></div>

<strong>Alex Kerfoot and Christian Dvorak have virtually identical career stats ... and they're only 16 months apart, both in their mid 20's.</strong>

<strong>And Kerfoot is just as good defensively and makes $1,000,000 less per season ... yet people call Kerfoot a bad #3C and a cap-dump.</strong>

<strong>That's the truth ... But I guess the silver lining is Dvorak only has to replace Kotkaniemi + Danault + a 2nd round pick. </strong>
Forum: Armchair-GM31 aoû à 16 h 34
Sujet: dvorak
Forum: NHL Signings16 aoû à 15 h 54
Forum: NHL Signings16 aoû à 14 h 44
Forum: NHL Signings16 aoû à 14 h 37
Forum: NHL Signings15 aoû à 18 h 55
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>pharrow</b></div><div>none of that has anything to do with anything about being top heavy.
You just realize that your math is way off, your comment was off, and now it's excuse time.
TOR is top heavy. Period. VAN hardly. The 5th-13th being better is neither here nor their. Being top heavy isn't about the talent level on the ice. It's about salary cap structure.
So why bother getting into some pissing contest over who's players are better. The fact that you had to go 13 deep to get there basically says, he down to the 4th line and 3rd pairing VAN pays more! Like WTF cares. That has nothing to do with being top heavy. Top 6 Top 4 Goalie you got 11. So you got most the 3rd line. It's basically the 4th line up. That's depth spending.

Clearly TOR has a better player in Matthews. But you're pushing your luck in saying Marner is. One could also argue that the Matthews contract sucks due to the length. So lets not pretend TOR did some great job in their top. They didn't. They over paid a lot. Almost no one wants that Marner contract. JT to 35 isn't exactly great and something teams probably don't want to hold onto.
If they were that much better than VAN how come those VAN players won a playoff round in the last 2 years and TOR has not?</div></div>

The break even is at 7-8 players for each team .... the top 7-8 contracts + buyouts next season are roughly equal between Toronto and Vancouver.

Toronto then begins to take the lead as you slide down the depth ....

<strong>Deal with it brotha. </strong>
Forum: NHL Signings15 aoû à 16 h 15
Forum: NHL Signings15 aoû à 11 h 33