Georgiey is not even worth a 2nd, leave alone Andersen and a 2nd

Georgiey is not even worth a 2nd, leave alone Andersen and a 2nd

Agreed! Keep your Freddy and 2nd. Georgiev isn’t even for sale anyways

He's worth more than a second lol. Let's just conveniently forget that he's got better numbers than Freddy over the past 2 seasons

Damn right!

«BuT hE's JuSt A bAcKuP»

Did he play as much as Freddie. Matt Murray was two Stanley Cups under his belt, had one bad season and got traded for a late 2nd round pick and an a a late round prospect. No way Georgiev is worth more than that.

And number coparison does not work his his favour either. Freddie had .909 this season and .917 last season, while having a .936 and 9.22 in the playoffs. Georgiev has .910 this season and 9.14 last season, without playing in the playoffs at all. not sure how this is better.

Did he play as much as Freddie. Matt Murray was two Stanley Cups under his belt, had one bad season and got traded for a late 2nd round pick and an a a late round prospect. No way Georgiev is worth more than that.

Stats really isn’t relevant when both goalies aren’t being moved by their GM’s. This whole thread is moot.. Georgiev is in his 2nd season and only getting better while Anderson is an aging stud in net on a bad defensive team. Can’t compare a rookie to a seasoned vet who is an allstar. After a few years of service Georgiev may be available for a hefty package but till then he will be playing very well as our 1B G. Again, neither G is moving so this thread is MOOT

And number coparison does not work his his favour either. Freddie had .909 this season and .917 last season, while having a .936 and 9.22 in the playoffs. Georgiev has .910 this season and 9.14 last season, without playing in the playoffs at all. not sure how this is better.

Have you seen the defensive team we have in front of AG in 18-19 for instance (which was, stats wise at least, his best NHL season so far)??? We literally had Shattenkirk, ADA, Pionk, Skjei (they two last I've mentionned weren't playing at their full capacity because Lindy Ruff), Staal and Smith. That's miles worse than Rielly, Muzzin, Gardiner, Hainsey, Zaitsev and Dermott.

And even with the offensive support that Freddy had in the 18-19 season AG had better numbers than him (he was literally better than Hank)
AG's GSAA in 18-19: 5,28
AG's GSAx in 18-19: 9,23
FA's GSAA in 18-19: 12,59
FA's GSAA in 18-19: 8,42

AG's GSAA in 19-20: -0,32
AG's GSAx in 19-20: 1,91
FA's GSAA in 19-20: -1,75
FA's GSAx in 19-20: -10,27

So in the GSAA category, FA was better than AG in 18-19 but was WORSE than him in 19-20
In the GSAx category, FA was WORSE than AG in 18-19 AND in 19-20

Did he play as much as Freddie. Matt Murray was two Stanley Cups under his belt, had one bad season and got traded for a late 2nd round pick and an a a late round prospect. No way Georgiev is worth more than that.

And number coparison does not work his his favour either. Freddie had .909 this season and .917 last season, while having a .936 and 9.22 in the playoffs. Georgiev has .910 this season and 9.14 last season, without playing in the playoffs at all. not sure how this is better.

Have you seen the defensive team we have in front of AG in 18-19 for instance (which was, stats wise at least, his best NHL season so far)??? We literally had Shattenkirk, ADA, Pionk, Skjei (they two last I've mentionned weren't playing at their full capacity because Lindy Ruff), Staal and Smith. That's miles worse than Rielly, Muzzin, Gardiner, Hainsey, Zaitsev and Dermott.

And even with the offensive support that Freddy had in the 18-19 season AG had better numbers than him (he was literally better than Hank)
AG's GSAA in 18-19: 5,28
AG's GSAx in 18-19: 9,23
FA's GSAA in 18-19: 12,59
FA's GSAA in 18-19: 8,42

AG's GSAA in 19-20: -0,32
AG's GSAx in 19-20: 1,91
FA's GSAA in 19-20: -1,75
FA's GSAx in 19-20: -10,27

So in the GSAA category, FA was better than AG in 18-19 but was WORSE than him in 19-20
In the GSAx category, FA was WORSE than AG in 18-19 AND in 19-20

Why did the Rangers play Hank in the playoffs and not him? And by the contract Hank just signed for the Caps, we know what the league think of Hank.

Why did the Rangers play Hank in the playoffs and not him? And by the contract Hank just signed for the Caps, we know what the league think of Hank.

Because Hank had the experience and his career numbers against the Canes were elite. Simple as that. Also for a parting shot because we probably knew we were going to buy him out

Not to mention Shesterkin being hurt

So, if the Rangers don't trust him in the playoffs, why should the Leafs. And yes, right, Shesterkin was hurt, so Georgiev did not manage to play when their nr. 1 was hurt.

So, if the Rangers don't trust him in the playoffs, why should the Leafs. And yes, right, Shesterkin was hurt, so Georgiev did not manage to play when their nr. 1 was hurt.