SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

tml16

Créé par: Maldabous
Équipe: 2016-17 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 11 oct. 2016
Publié: 13 oct. 2016
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Marincin is gone
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2017
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de SJS
Logo de OTT
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2018
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2019
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2373 000 000 $57 532 001 $512 000 $5 582 500 $15 467 999 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
2 950 000 $2 950 000 $
AD, AG, C
UFA - 2
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C
UFA - 6
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
4 200 000 $4 200 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
UFA - 3
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C
UFA - 3
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
UFA - 2
625 000 $625 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
C
UFA - 1
686 667 $686 667 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
4 050 000 $4 050 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 5
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 1
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
600 000 $600 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
686 667 $686 667 $
DG
UFA - 4
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
612 500 $612 500 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
13 oct. 2016 à 9 h 50
#1
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,881
Mentions "j'aime": 22,885
Gee, aren't you being a little harsh? Leafs had 68 points last year, and now they are on a pace to have 82 this year. Matthews "disappeared" in the third period....no goals.
13 oct. 2016 à 9 h 57
#2
Démarrer sujet
maldabous
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 79
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Quoting: palhal
Gee, aren't you being a little harsh? Leafs had 68 points last year, and now they are on a pace to have 82 this year. Matthews "disappeared" in the third period....no goals.
Have you seen the goals that went by him, his rebounds were horrible, i'd rather have Riemer in net based on Preseason and that one game, at least the leafs would have won this game
13 oct. 2016 à 10 h 0
#3
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,881
Mentions "j'aime": 22,885
I agree with Andersen's goaltending wasn't good last night.....It's a long season......relax. I've waited longer than you....well since 1967. Things and Andersen will get better.
13 oct. 2016 à 10 h 6
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 171
Mentions "j'aime": 4
Quoting: palhal
I agree with Andersen's goaltending wasn't good last night.....It's a long season......relax. I've waited longer than you....well since 1967. Things and Andersen will get better.

I agree though Andersen let in at least 2 bad goals the goal JVR redirected was totally not his fault.
13 oct. 2016 à 10 h 11
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 8,221
Mentions "j'aime": 3,642
Andersen is in for a long year. He had it easy with the Ducks d-men, and overall team defense. Tor doesn't have that.

It's only the first game, and all goalies have bad nights. As long as he doesn't turn into a basket case (possible) he'll be okay.

The most entertaining games of the year might be Dallas v Tor. awesome face
13 oct. 2016 à 10 h 15
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 198
Mentions "j'aime": 10
To think, they had a chance to pick up Wedgewood for free a couple days ago. With goaltending being the biggest unknown, might have been worth carrying three goalies instead of 8D for a while.
Hunwick or Polak would have easily passed through waivers.
13 oct. 2016 à 10 h 59
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 1,363
Mentions "j'aime": 144
With a 5 year contract tucked in his jeans, sure Anderson isn't worried about you giving him 1 more game!
13 oct. 2016 à 13 h 42
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 274
Mentions "j'aime": 12
Modifié 13 oct. 2016 à 14 h 29 par Banks
Why are you guys making so much judgement from a single ******* game. If Morgan Rielly makes a bad play does that mean he should be traded? If Matthews doesn't score a goal in the next 10 games does that mean he should be sent to the AHL? Probably wish you had Carlyle too, and then they wonder why they have been so bad for the last decade.
13 oct. 2016 à 15 h 10
#9
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,881
Mentions "j'aime": 22,885
Quoting: brian123
To think, they had a chance to pick up Wedgewood for free a couple days ago. With goaltending being the biggest unknown, might have been worth carrying three goalies instead of 8D for a while.
Hunwick or Polak would have easily passed through waivers.


Let's not start with these silly Wedgwood for Vezina rumours. If he was NHL good, don't you think the NJD would have kept him? If he was NHL good, don't you think another NHL team would have picked up on waivers? By your logic, why not make Wedgwood the # 1, Leafs waive Andersen (he gets claimed) and the Leafs save 4m in cap.
gunshot125 a aimé ceci.
13 oct. 2016 à 15 h 26
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 274
Mentions "j'aime": 12
Quoting: palhal
Quoting: brian123
To think, they had a chance to pick up Wedgewood for free a couple days ago. With goaltending being the biggest unknown, might have been worth carrying three goalies instead of 8D for a while.
Hunwick or Polak would have easily passed through waivers.


Let's not start with these silly Wedgwood for Vezina rumours. If he was NHL good, don't you think the NJD would have kept him? If he was NHL good, don't you think another NHL team would have picked up on waivers? By your logic, why not make Wedgwood the # 1, Leafs waive Andersen (he gets claimed) and the Leafs save 4m in cap.


Just nonsense, please leaf fans, please for the love of god give Andersen at least 20 starts before some of you decide to run him out of town. It hurts as a hab fan hoping the leafs-habs rivalry can exist again.
13 oct. 2016 à 17 h 40
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 322
Mentions "j'aime": 31
It's way way too early to judge Andersen, however as Leafs fans we have seen us bring in a young unproven goalie who doesn't perform to expectations all too often. It is worrying however that Anderson's 2 starts in a leafs jersey were awful and that he played behind arguably the best defensive systems in the league beforehand.
13 oct. 2016 à 21 h 22
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 198
Mentions "j'aime": 10
Modifié 13 oct. 2016 à 21 h 45
Quoting: palhal
Quoting: brian123
To think, they had a chance to pick up Wedgewood for free a couple days ago. With goaltending being the biggest unknown, might have been worth carrying three goalies instead of 8D for a while.
Hunwick or Polak would have easily passed through waivers.


Let's not start with these silly Wedgwood for Vezina rumours. If he was NHL good, don't you think the NJD would have kept him? If he was NHL good, don't you think another NHL team would have picked up on waivers? By your logic, why not make Wedgwood the # 1, Leafs waive Andersen (he gets claimed) and the Leafs save 4m in cap.


Vezina now eh? Thats cool palhal, I believe I suggested that it might be worth carrying 3 goalies for a while as the leafs goaltending is their biggest question mark. Wedgewood would be third in depth behind Anderson and Enroth and he is easily better than the rest of the leafs goalie prospects. Devils have Schnieder (better than Anderson), Kincaid (same as Enroth) and Blackwood (potentially better than all of them) in the system. Losing Wedgewood was a risk but they chose to keep Kincaid. Also helped that Condon was waived at the same time. I would think that if Condon wasnt waived, Wedgewood would be a penguin now. Anyways, leafs had a chance to add depth for free at their weakest organizational position and they chose instead to pick up another 5'9" forward that used to play for the London Knights.
14 oct. 2016 à 21 h 1
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 274
Mentions "j'aime": 12
Quoting: Wotisthebest
It's way way too early to judge Andersen, however as Leafs fans we have seen us bring in a young unproven goalie who doesn't perform to expectations all too often. It is worrying however that Anderson's 2 starts in a leafs jersey were awful and that he played behind arguably the best defensive systems in the league beforehand.


Why are you guys so quick to judge, pathetic, give the guy a chance before you run him out of town just like kessel! He also had 2 solid games in preseason againt Detroit and Ottawa, and he is just coming back from an injury.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage