SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Sergachev and Demko

Créé par: Cham
Équipe: 2020-21 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 5 oct. 2020
Publié: 5 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Get mad.

Poor idea I fleshed out, was just gonna do Demko but why not also sergachev.

Demko probably gets moved this year or next if Markstrom is resigned which according to Friedman is Bennings no. 1 priority, if he is put on the trading block this year then he automatically becomes the best goalie on the block imo.

Habs own Chicago’s 3rd that we would need for the offer sheet but if we could offer a 3rd this year cause of the deeper draft or a later year plus another pick or Kampf then Bowman could probably get it back.

Bowman would probably never do this but maybe he’s had some time to self reflect during quarantine and has decided to just do everything in this offseason.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
56 500 000 $
33 500 000 $
34 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
13 000 000 $
Offres hostiles
Le salaire annuel moyen (AAV) de l'offre hostile est calculé en divisant la valeur totale du contrat par: 1. La durée totale du contrat, ou 2. Cinq ans
JOUEURAAVCOMPENSATION
Sergachev, Mikhail6 500 000 $
Choix de 1e ronde en 2021
Choix de 3e ronde en 2021
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (CHI)
MTL
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2021 (MTL)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (CHI)
2.
CHI
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (BOS)
3.
CHI
    Future considerations
    DET
    1. Smith, Zack
    2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (BOS)
    4.
    CHI
    1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2020 (EDM)
    5.
    VAN
    1. Murphy, Connor
    2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (PIT)
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2020
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de EDM
    2021
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    2022
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2281 500 000 $70 084 647 $1 090 244 $5 982 500 $11 415 353 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    AD, AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
    C, AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
    AD
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    C, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    725 000 $725 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DD
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
    DD
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    880 833 $880 833 $
    AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    925 000 $925 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    5 oct. 2020 à 1 h 45
    #1
    In Connor We Trust
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2020
    Messages: 3,315
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,080
    Chicago has no interest in the Demko trade
    5 oct. 2020 à 1 h 46
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2017
    Messages: 19,079
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,404
    Selling way low on Kampf (he's worth a 3rd defensively amazing 4C) and there is no reason we should be selling him. Thatcher isn't worth both Murphy and the #17OA, I wouldn't give up the #17OA for him let alone including murphy
    Beetlejuice a aimé ceci.
    5 oct. 2020 à 1 h 53
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 1,039
    Mentions "j'aime": 369
    I actually really like most of these moves. The team looks a lot better besides Seabrook

    Demko trade is overpayment though
    Cham a aimé ceci.
    5 oct. 2020 à 2 h 13
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 14,042
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,158
    MTL won’t do that
    5 oct. 2020 à 2 h 33
    #5
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2017
    Messages: 130
    Mentions "j'aime": 31
    Quoting: Beetlejuice
    Chicago has no interest in the Demko trade


    Quoting: ChiHawk
    Thatcher isn't worth both Murphy and the #17OA, I wouldn't give up the #17OA for him let alone including murphy


    Quoting: Breadmanhawks
    Demko trade is overpayment though


    I guess I way overvalued Demko but I adjusted it for a second plus Murphy which now thinking more about it seems like fair value to me and fills needs for each team.
    5 oct. 2020 à 2 h 33
    #6
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2017
    Messages: 130
    Mentions "j'aime": 31
    Quoting: GMs
    MTL won’t do that


    Uh why?
    5 oct. 2020 à 2 h 37
    #7
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2017
    Messages: 130
    Mentions "j'aime": 31
    Quoting: ChiHawk
    Selling way low on Kampf (he's worth a 3rd defensively amazing 4C) and there is no reason we should be selling him.


    I’ve just always been low on him and I know I’ve traded him for a fifth on here before and people have said he’s not worth it so idk what to say. That being said I think bowman’s high on him and probably won’t move him, I just did cause I like Carpenter and Highmore more.
    5 oct. 2020 à 2 h 42
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 1,039
    Mentions "j'aime": 369
    Quoting: Cham
    I guess I way overvalued Demko but I adjusted it for a second plus Murphy which now thinking more about it seems like fair value to me and fills needs for each team.


    I would also say that Kubalik's deal needs to be longer or shorter. That deal takes him to UFA I believe
    5 oct. 2020 à 3 h 25
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 14,042
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,158
    Quoting: Cham
    Uh why?


    Because we don’t know where that 2021 3rd rounder will be, he might trade it, maybe not. No need to trade it right now
    5 oct. 2020 à 3 h 32
    #10
    Canuck
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 374
    Mentions "j'aime": 75
    Vancouver declines. We'd rather keep Tanev then trade for Murphy and Demko is not going anywhere right now.
    5 oct. 2020 à 8 h 23
    #11
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2016
    Messages: 33,053
    Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
    If Demko goes anywhere it'll be Detroit, And noway Sergachev signs that offer sheet.
    5 oct. 2020 à 9 h 6
    #12
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2017
    Messages: 130
    Mentions "j'aime": 31
    Quoting: DiehardRedWingsFan58
    If Demko goes anywhere it'll be Detroit, And noway Sergachev signs that offer sheet.


    Lmao why would Detroit be the only place he goes DiehardRedWingsFan58?

    Oh and also maybe he’d want shorter term (3 years to resign when the cap goes up) but he’s not getting that money or 1st pair minutes in Tampa
    5 oct. 2020 à 9 h 13
    #13
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2017
    Messages: 130
    Mentions "j'aime": 31
    Quoting: eVANder
    Vancouver declines. We'd rather keep Tanev then trade for Murphy and Demko is not going anywhere right now.


    I partly agree that Demko won’t go anywhere rn but he’ll be moved at some point if Markstrom is resigned and so whether it’s now or in a year he’ll get moved and that’s likely the return. If he’s moved next year (cause his contracts up and you’ll be needing every dollar you can get for Petterson and Hughes) the hawks stick with crow for a year and then bring in Demko to be the starter rather than the backup for a year.
    tl;dr - Demkos traded eventually with a similar return

    If you can’t keep Tanev cause he asks for money you don’t have then Murphy should look pretty enticing, especially if the hawks can retain salary.
    5 oct. 2020 à 9 h 16
    #14
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2017
    Messages: 130
    Mentions "j'aime": 31
    Quoting: GMs
    Because we don’t know where that 2021 3rd rounder will be, he might trade it, maybe not. No need to trade it right now


    Hence the extra asset you’re receiving. I think the only way Bergevin doesn’t do this is if he’s trying to offer sheet Sergachev and doesn’t want to compete with the hawks.
    5 oct. 2020 à 9 h 20
    #15
    Canuck
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 374
    Mentions "j'aime": 75
    Quoting: Cham
    I partly agree that Demko won’t go anywhere rn but he’ll be moved at some point if Markstrom is resigned and so whether it’s now or in a year he’ll get moved and that’s likely the return. If he’s moved next year (cause his contracts up and you’ll be needing every dollar you can get for Petterson and Hughes) the hawks stick with crow for a year and then bring in Demko to be the starter rather than the backup for a year.
    tl;dr - Demkos traded eventually with a similar return

    If you can’t keep Tanev cause he asks for money you don’t have then Murphy should look pretty enticing, especially if the hawks can retain salary.


    Vancouver can't afford to resign Markstrom. He's more than likely going to free agency. If we do resign him, we have a year to move Demko before the expansion draft. If Van cant resign Tanev then we can't take on murphy's contract either. Lots of D in free agency too. Don't need to trade for Murphy. He's not a top 4 guy on a good team.
    5 oct. 2020 à 9 h 21
    #16
    Buffbry
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2017
    Messages: 8,954
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,369
    Zach smith and this year's third for erne or futures
    5 oct. 2020 à 9 h 26
    #17
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2017
    Messages: 130
    Mentions "j'aime": 31
    Quoting: buffbry
    Zach smith and this year's third for erne or futures


    I was about to make it a 3rd when I originally did this trade but seeing that Marc Staal only fetched a 2nd for a far worse contract I don’t see how Detroit gets a 3rd.
    5 oct. 2020 à 9 h 35
    #18
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2017
    Messages: 130
    Mentions "j'aime": 31
    Quoting: eVANder
    Vancouver can't afford to resign Markstrom. He's more than likely going to free agency. If we do resign him, we have a year to move Demko before the expansion draft. If Van cant resign Tanev then we can't take on murphy's contract either. Lots of D in free agency too. Don't need to trade for Murphy. He's not a top 4 guy on a good team.


    See if I was Jim Benning I’d keep Toffoli and Tanev and let Markstrom walk, Jim Benning however is an entirely different person who according to Friedman has resigning Markstrom as his no. 1 priority. If Murphy doesn’t work the value still does and it can either become a 3 way trade with someone like TOR who needs a RHD desperately or another piece is moved.
    And once again this year or next you’ll get a similar return on Demko. Maybe you’d get another 3rd if you waited but why not let DiPietro get NHL minutes if he’s finally ready (which Benning has thought he is for two years considering he inexplicably gets lit up from time to time when he gets put in an NHL game).
    5 oct. 2020 à 9 h 39
    #19
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 8,297
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,946
    gave up too much for Demko
    5 oct. 2020 à 9 h 52
    #20
    Canuck
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 374
    Mentions "j'aime": 75
    Quoting: Cham
    See if I was Jim Benning I’d keep Toffoli and Tanev and let Markstrom walk, Jim Benning however is an entirely different person who according to Friedman has resigning Markstrom as his no. 1 priority. If Murphy doesn’t work the value still does and it can either become a 3 way trade with someone like TOR who needs a RHD desperately or another piece is moved.
    And once again this year or next you’ll get a similar return on Demko. Maybe you’d get another 3rd if you waited but why not let DiPietro get NHL minutes if he’s finally ready (which Benning has thought he is for two years considering he inexplicably gets lit up from time to time when he gets put in an NHL game).


    Murphy gives me flashbacks of Gudbranson. I'd hate to see it but we'll see.
    5 oct. 2020 à 10 h 41
    #21
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2017
    Messages: 130
    Mentions "j'aime": 31
    Quoting: Wadejos123
    gave up too much for Demko


    Even a 2nd plus Murphy is too much?
    5 oct. 2020 à 15 h 34
    #22
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 8,297
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,946
    Quoting: Cham
    Even a 2nd plus Murphy is too much?


    He's worth a mid to late 1st imo. Murphy is worth a mid/;ate first as well imo. I don't think the 2nd is nessicary
    5 oct. 2020 à 16 h 25
    #23
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2017
    Messages: 130
    Mentions "j'aime": 31
    Quoting: eVANder
    Don't need to trade for Murphy. He's not a top 4 guy on a good team.


    Quoting: eVANder
    Murphy gives me flashbacks of Gudbranson. I'd hate to see it but we'll see.


    Quoting: Wadejos123
    Murphy is worth a mid/;ate first as well imo. I don't think the 2nd is nessicary

    You two can duke it out from here but I’ll add my two cents first: Demko for future considerations
    eVANder a aimé ceci.
    5 oct. 2020 à 17 h 23
    #24
    Canuck
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 374
    Mentions "j'aime": 75
    Quoting: Cham
    You two can duke it out from here but I’ll add my two cents first: Demko for future considerations


    Lol
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage