SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Based on the Russo rumor

Créé par: Jexus
Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 1 oct. 2020
Publié: 1 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I really hope Dubnyk refuses to waive. Im not high on Donato either. If anything more than a 3rd and 5th is offered i will vomit. These are not quality additions.
Transactions
MIN
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
Détails additionnels:
Pls god let Dubnyk void the trade
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TBL
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de OTT
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
1881 500 000 $64 215 000 $0 $430 000 $17 285 000 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
768 333 $768 333 $ (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
836 667 $836 667 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
763 333 $763 333 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 166 667 $2 166 667 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
1 oct. 2020 à 19 h 7
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 8,221
Mentions "j'aime": 3,642
I have no clue why SJS are interested in Dub. That's $8m-$10m (depending on retained salary) tied up in bad goalies.

Dontao is worth a flyer if he's cheap (no more than a late 2nd) and they'll give him a chance at meaningful icetime.
TanSor a aimé ceci.
1 oct. 2020 à 19 h 20
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 1,421
Mentions "j'aime": 313
Only way I'd be ok with adding Dubnyk is if MIN retains 50% salary.
1 oct. 2020 à 19 h 38
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,246
Mentions "j'aime": 2,876
Dubnyk's negative value without retention basically wipes out Donato's value. Maybe take out the 3rd and it's closer.
1 oct. 2020 à 19 h 41
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 5,353
Mentions "j'aime": 3,390
Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
Dubnyk's negative value without retention basically wipes out Donato's value. Maybe take out the 3rd and it's closer.


So retain Dubnyk at 50%, he no longer has negative value, possibly even has positive value is SJ thinks he can rebound, and the price is closer to a 2nd.
1 oct. 2020 à 19 h 51
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 8,697
Mentions "j'aime": 7,071
Quoting: wabit
I have no clue why SJS are interested in Dub. That's $8m-$10m (depending on retained salary) tied up in bad goalies.

Dontao is worth a flyer if he's cheap (no more than a late 2nd) and they'll give him a chance at meaningful icetime.


Quoting: JumboFett
Only way I'd be ok with adding Dubnyk is if MIN retains 50% salary.


I don't see any way the sharks would be interested if we didn't retain half of Dubnyk's cap... If they are Wilson deserves the axe
JumboFett a aimé ceci.
1 oct. 2020 à 21 h 2
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,246
Mentions "j'aime": 2,876
Quoting: Caerii
So retain Dubnyk at 50%, he no longer has negative value, possibly even has positive value is SJ thinks he can rebound, and the price is closer to a 2nd.


Something like that.
1 oct. 2020 à 21 h 11
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,450
Mentions "j'aime": 576
Quoting: TanSor
I don't see any way the sharks would be interested if we didn't retain half of Dubnyk's cap... If they are Wilson deserves the axe


With the high quality goalies available in FA i have no idea why he would do this.
TanSor et Rob32sjsharks a aimé ceci.
1 oct. 2020 à 22 h 26
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 422
Mentions "j'aime": 226
Quoting: Jexus
With the high quality goalies available in FA i have no idea why he would do this.


Only thing I can think of is there's an out for Jones somewhere and they need a better established guy to split the load with Dell. Outside of that, I agree it makes little sense.
2 oct. 2020 à 10 h 10
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,450
Mentions "j'aime": 576
Quoting: SJS2212
Only thing I can think of is there's an out for Jones somewhere and they need a better established guy to split the load with Dell. Outside of that, I agree it makes little sense.


Dell is UFA and very likely not re-signing.
2 oct. 2020 à 10 h 42
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 422
Mentions "j'aime": 226
Quoting: Jexus
Dell is UFA and very likely not re-signing.


I think if they can move out Jones they would bring Dell back at a discount (has already said he'd be willing to take one to stay). You can't bring back the Jones-Dell combo for a third year after the bad results in the prior two, but if you can move Jones out it makes sense to bring back a known goalie (who played really well under the new staff) for cheap so you can upgrade elsewhere.
2 oct. 2020 à 16 h 22
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,450
Mentions "j'aime": 576
Quoting: SJS2212
I think if they can move out Jones they would bring Dell back at a discount (has already said he'd be willing to take one to stay). You can't bring back the Jones-Dell combo for a third year after the bad results in the prior two, but if you can move Jones out it makes sense to bring back a known goalie (who played really well under the new staff) for cheap so you can upgrade elsewhere.


Bringing Dell back is a major mistake. I am 99% sure it’s not in the books.
2 oct. 2020 à 17 h 21
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 422
Mentions "j'aime": 226
Quoting: Jexus
Bringing Dell back is a major mistake. I am 99% sure it’s not in the books.


Now that reports are out that they're expecting Jones to rebound back into a #1, then yeah I agree. However, Dell was the better goalie for most of last season (stats bear that out) so not sure it would be a huge mistake if they could move Jones (which is likely impossible). Sounds like they're looking to run Jones and another veteran starter next year though based on Lebrun's article today.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage