SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Mock-Draft

Montreal Canadiens Draft List

Montreal Canadiens Draft List

Cuvée de repêchage: 2020
Créé par: Club_de_Hockey_le_Canadien
Publié: 24 sept. 2020 à 10 h 0
24 sept. 2020 à 10 h 1
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 2,565
Mentions "j'aime": 865
Make one of these for your favorite team, I'd love to see a collection of them. One list for each team. Rankings up until the pick.
24 sept. 2020 à 10 h 19
#2
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 13,144
Mentions "j'aime": 10,516
Lapierre, Schneider, & Zary are too high IMO. My list would be the same for 1-11, and after that I’d do:

12. Jarvis
13. Mercer
14. Holloway
15. Perreault
16. Amirov
24 sept. 2020 à 12 h 4
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 114
Mentions "j'aime": 30
Quoting: Kotkaniemi15
Lapierre, Schneider, & Zary are too high IMO. My list would be the same for 1-11, and after that I’d do:

12. Jarvis
13. Mercer
14. Holloway
15. Perreault
16. Amirov


I personally have Holloway and Amriov above Mercer and Jarvis because, in my opinion, we need depth RW as we have 2 very solid RW Prospects already in Ylonen and Caufield and we lack top tier LW prospects but we have the depth in Teasdale and Harvey-Pinard. so I'd try to address the lack of high-end talent on the left first over adding more high-end right side talent.
24 sept. 2020 à 12 h 16
#4
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 13,144
Mentions "j'aime": 10,516
Quoting: EhRobin3
I personally have Holloway and Amriov above Mercer and Jarvis because, in my opinion, we need depth RW as we have 2 very solid RW Prospects already in Ylonen and Caufield and we lack top tier LW prospects but we have the depth in Teasdale and Harvey-Pinard. so I'd try to address the lack of high-end talent on the left first over adding more high-end right side talent.


That’s fair, but we have Drouin & Tatar on LW, and it isn’t a big deal to move wingers to the opposite wing. Also I like Jarvis & Mercer quite a bit more than Holloway & Amirov, so I can’t bring myself not to pick the BPA.
24 sept. 2020 à 17 h 20
#5
Fan of the OHL
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 327
Mentions "j'aime": 125
Quoting: Kotkaniemi15
Lapierre, Schneider, & Zary are too high IMO. My list would be the same for 1-11, and after that I’d do:

12. Jarvis
13. Mercer
14. Holloway
15. Perreault
16. Amirov


I agree with this list except I would put Gunler ahead of Amirov
24 sept. 2020 à 18 h 24
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 2,565
Mentions "j'aime": 865
Quoting: Leemer
I agree with this list except I would put Gunler ahead of Amirov


I'd rather Amirov or Gunler than Perreault. He seems like a one-dimensional player and I have a feeling he'll go higher than expected and bust.
'
Leemer a aimé ceci.
24 sept. 2020 à 22 h 9
#7
Fan of the OHL
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 327
Mentions "j'aime": 125
Quoting: Club_de_Hockey_le_Canadien
I'd rather Amirov or Gunler than Perreault. He seems like a one-dimensional player and I have a feeling he'll go higher than expected and bust.
'

Jacob has a pretty good role model and mentor in his dad former player Yanic. He knows all the angles and hard work required And the respect for coaching. I’m not so sure he has a low floor and bust risk. Defense can be taught - remember Guy Carbonneau was one dimensional when he was in junior
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage