SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

priorities

Créé par: major_hassle
Équipe: 2020-21 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 23 sept. 2020
Publié: 23 sept. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Assumed these priorities:
1. space next season for pettersson, hughes
2. retain assets: 2/3 of tanev, markstrom, toffoli
3. cost controlled RHD or star RHD. why trade assets for a 1-for-1 replacement of stetcher or tanev at a similar salary?
4. upgrade #3C: must PK
5. leave space for young D, F prospects to play if they want to from camp

Thoughts:
-didn't upgrade the RD in this one
-stetcher, benn, roussel, sutter, leivo all options to be dealt after camp or at trade deadline if other players (juolevi/rathbone, rafferty, baertschi, hoglander, podkolzin) beat them for their spots. space to sign podkolzin later in the year. 33 million in cap space to handle the signing of pettersson, hughes, demko + 8 players, where team's main priority would remain quality RHD and 3C. Backes shifts canucks cap burden away from next season to this season while representing a defensive upgrade on gaudette.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 200 000 $
41 500 000 $
43 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
44 500 000 $
44 800 000 $
11 500 000 $
23 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Erne, Adam [Droits de RFA]
DET
  1. Eriksson, Loui
  2. Gaudette, Adam [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (VAN)
2.
ANA
  1. Beagle, Jay (500 000 $ retained)
  2. Virtanen, Jake [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
Trade an earlier end to cap hit with backes for virtanen's rights. Similar salary owed (backes owed 2.25, beagle owed 4.4 over 2 years, less 1 million retained total).
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Frais appliqués
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de ANA
2021
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $78 781 878 $1 700 000 $4 750 000 $2 718 122 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 800 000 $4 800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 375 000 $4 375 000 $
AD, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
23 sept. 2020 à 17 h 20
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 462
Mentions "j'aime": 38
Keep in mind Backes may not be available for a while depending on when he recovers
23 sept. 2020 à 17 h 27
#2
Buffbry
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 9,086
Mentions "j'aime": 5,434
Wings have to pass on this, we need one of demko or dipietro back in order to take loui
ISeeBlueHeLooks a aimé ceci.
23 sept. 2020 à 17 h 29
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 309
Mentions "j'aime": 60
Quoting: buffbry
Wings have to pass on this, we need one of demko or dipietro back in order to take loui


interesting - would love to hear from other wings fans given I think gaudette's probably worth more than dipietro.

lets put it this way: would gladly swap gaudette for dipietro in that trade.
buffbry a aimé ceci.
23 sept. 2020 à 17 h 31
#4
Buffbry
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 9,086
Mentions "j'aime": 5,434
Quoting: major_hassle
interesting - would love to hear from other wings fans given I think gaudette's probably worth more than dipietro.

lets put it this way: would gladly swap gaudette for dipietro in that trade.


We do need a center, I just think position of need is goalie for wings, plus it also solved your kraken goalie issue in a year
23 sept. 2020 à 17 h 33
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 945
Mentions "j'aime": 393
Quoting: major_hassle
interesting - would love to hear from other wings fans given I think gaudette's probably worth more than dipietro.

lets put it this way: would gladly swap gaudette for dipietro in that trade.


Wings fans could care less about DiPietro in a return. I’d ask for Höglander.
23 sept. 2020 à 17 h 33
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 945
Mentions "j'aime": 393
Quoting: buffbry
We do need a center, I just think position of need is goalie for wings, plus it also solved your kraken goalie issue in a year


DiPietro is exempt
buffbry a aimé ceci.
23 sept. 2020 à 17 h 34
#7
alwaysnextyear
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 5,592
Mentions "j'aime": 1,609
My biggest problem with this is the idea that Backes would be an upgrade at 3C over Gaudette; I'd be surprised if he was an upgrade over Beagle at 4C at this point. As others noted above it might be better to hold onto Gaudette and use Demko to dump Loui if possible instead.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
23 sept. 2020 à 17 h 37
#8
Blue
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 87
Mentions "j'aime": 38
Quoting: major_hassle
interesting - would love to hear from other wings fans given I think gaudette's probably worth more than dipietro.

lets put it this way: would gladly swap gaudette for dipietro in that trade.


The rationale behind requesting the goalie is based on what the Wings need in the future, rather than the present. Does Gaudette have top six potential? Unlikely. The Wings have plenty of young guys that should be up in the next year or two that can fill the bottom six. What they lack is a quality goalie prospect that is close to being ready for the NHL (hopefully Filip Larsson can stay healthy and become one, but that's not something they can count on). Does Gaudette make the Wings better next year? Yeah, a bit, but looking at the long term view that really isn't very important.
23 sept. 2020 à 17 h 42
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 945
Mentions "j'aime": 393
Quoting: ISeeBlueHeLooks
The rationale behind requesting the goalie is based on what the Wings need in the future, rather than the present. Does Gaudette have top six potential? Unlikely. The Wings have plenty of young guys that should be up in the next year or two that can fill the bottom six. What they lack is a quality goalie prospect that is close to being ready for the NHL (hopefully Filip Larsson can stay healthy and become one, but that's not something they can count on). Does Gaudette make the Wings better next year? Yeah, a bit, but looking at the long term view that really isn't very important.


DiPietro is not that guy to be our legit future #1, he’s barely a better prospect than Filip Larsson. DiPietro is not at the level of Demko. Why do you think smallish 6 foot goalie prospects hold so much value
23 sept. 2020 à 17 h 49
#10
Blue
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 87
Mentions "j'aime": 38
Quoting: SweetRevenge19
DiPietro is not that guy to be our legit future #1, he’s barely a better prospect than Filip Larsson. DiPietro is not at the level of Demko. Why do you think smallish 6 foot goalie prospects hold so much value


If they don't value DiPietro as a top 10 goalie prospect then you're absolutely right.
23 sept. 2020 à 17 h 50
#11
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 41,200
Mentions "j'aime": 25,944
Welcome to CapFriendly!

This is an interesting trade from Anaheim's perspective. Bear in mind that we're planning on playing Backes at #4 C and he's only owed $1.5 million for the remainder of this season. (Boston is retaining $1.5 million of his salary.)
23 sept. 2020 à 17 h 54
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 307
Mentions "j'aime": 64
Quoting: minionhypers
Keep in mind Backes may not be available for a while depending on when he recovers


Recovering from what?
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage