Modifié 13 sept. 2020 à 13 h 2
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
What a massive overpay. Danault is good but seriously, this isn't Bergeron we are talking about. Besides that, Matthews is turning into an incredibly good defensive player. Coupled with his incredible offensive game, why wouldn't you put him out there against the other teams best. He can defend them better than Danault will and also make them play defence all the time. This trade is so needless and honesty just bad. If you want a two way centre. Keep the 15th and pick Lapierre.
Absolutely zero interest in taking Lapierre. Also, I did keep the 15th pick.
I don't think this is a massive overpay. I think it is a slight one (I always tend to overpay in my AGM's so as not to hear dumb **** from other fanbases), but I also think you are undervaluing Danault. To get a guy of his caliber for $1.5m would be awesome. He's one of the best defensive C's in the game and also ranks in the top 30 in 5v5 points over the last two years. Matthews has had one season of being above average defensively, and while I expect that trend to continue, I don't see the issue with allowing Danault (definitely better defensively than Matthews) to take the tough match ups, freeing up the Tavares/Matthews/Marner line to play against other teams lesser players. At the very least, match ups don't have to be a concern for the Leafs at all and they can roll their lines however they want and let other teams chase them. I don't have an issue with running Matthews against other teams top guys, but I'm not opposed to this either. All in all, I think this trade (I'm looking at DeMelo as part of the benefit of it), while an overpay and not absolutely essential I agree with you on that, upgrades the Leafs at offence and defense.
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
You listen to pundits who make money by speculating about the Leafs. Reality doesn't matter to them, just emotions of fans. Like Burke constantly saying Nylander has to be traded for some 2nd tier right handed nearly 30 year old defenceman because truckulence.
What are you even talking about?