SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Murray to COL

Créé par: gpmack95
Équipe: 2020-21 Avalanche du Colorado
Date de création initiale: 10 sept. 2020
Publié: 10 sept. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
65 300 000 $
54 825 000 $
43 500 000 $
21 750 000 $
21 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
31 850 000 $
21 650 000 $
Transactions
1.
COL
  1. Murray, Matt [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (PIT)
PIT
  1. Zadorov, Nikita [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (COL)
2.
COL
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (EDM)
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de EDM
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
2022
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de PIT
Logo de COL
Logo de EDM
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
2023
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $75 377 262 $0 $2 500 000 $6 122 738 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 571 429 $5 571 429 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 300 000 $6 300 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 5
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 825 000 $4 825 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
DD
UFA - 1
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 450 000 $3 450 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
1 850 000 $1 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 4

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
10 sept. 2020 à 22 h 11
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 8,634
Mentions "j'aime": 3,931
Wouldn’t be top choice but I’d take that oilers deal
10 sept. 2020 à 22 h 12
#2
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,581
Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
That's an awful Grubauer trade for Colorado. He's worth at least a 2nd, if not with a +.

It's unlikely we move for Murray.
10 sept. 2020 à 22 h 27
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 14,042
Mentions "j'aime": 5,158
Quoting: Richard88
That's an awful Grubauer trade for Colorado. He's worth at least a 2nd, if not with a +.

It's unlikely we move for Murray.


Lehner costed a 2nd
Grubauer is always injured
10 sept. 2020 à 22 h 45
#4
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,581
Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
Quoting: GMs
Lehner costed a 2nd
Grubauer is always injured


He had one bad season with injuries, that's all. It happens. Before that he was mostly healthy.
10 sept. 2020 à 22 h 53
#5
Oilers GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 1,584
Mentions "j'aime": 566
Easy accept from the Oilers
GMs a aimé ceci.
10 sept. 2020 à 22 h 54
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 14,042
Mentions "j'aime": 5,158
Quoting: Richard88
He had one bad season with injuries, that's all. It happens. Before that he was mostly healthy.


But how could he get more than Lehner when he came back from a season he’s been injured ? We’ll see, but I would be surprise a 2nd +
10 sept. 2020 à 22 h 55
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 14,042
Mentions "j'aime": 5,158
Quoting: Richard88
He had one bad season with injuries, that's all. It happens. Before that he was mostly healthy.


Just to make sure I think Grubauer is worth more than a 3rd + 5th but no 2nd +
10 sept. 2020 à 22 h 58
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 18
Mentions "j'aime": 6
If EDM accepts this deal, what do we have left for draft picks? A 1st, 6th and 7th? No thanks
11 sept. 2020 à 2 h 17
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2015
Messages: 1,086
Mentions "j'aime": 324
Quoting: GMs
Just to make sure I think Grubauer is worth more than a 3rd + 5th but no 2nd +


Grubauer cost the Avalanche a 2nd round pick and the Brooks Orpik buyout. He’s a couple years older but has proven he can be a starting goalie in that time. I’m not sure you can argue that he should be worth less now than he was 2 years ago. Maybe a saturated goalie market this offseason hurts his value a little bit. Regarding the injuries - goalies take wear and tear. I wouldn’t put too much stock into injury history unless it was something major. Part of it is just bad luck.

Quoting: Richard88
That's an awful Grubauer trade for Colorado. He's worth at least a 2nd, if not with a +.

It's unlikely we move for Murray.


I’m curious about why you think it’s unlikely that Colorado trades for Murray? Multiple reporters have at least linked Colorado to Murray. He wouldn’t be my first choice if I were Sakic, but he’s an upgrade in my opinion.
Richard88 a aimé ceci.
11 sept. 2020 à 6 h 6
#10
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,581
Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
Quoting: GMs
But how could he get more than Lehner when he came back from a season he’s been injured ? We’ll see, but I would be surprise a 2nd +


Quoting: GMs
Just to make sure I think Grubauer is worth more than a 3rd + 5th but no 2nd +


As Mergus said below Grubauer's value has only gone up as he's proved he can be a starter. He may only have one year term, but he's still young enough where a long-term extension isn't hugely risky (as it is with other UFA 30+ goalies).

A big factor is also his caphit. For a starting goalie a $3.33m caphit is excellent value, especially in flat cap league. If we made him available I'm sure several teams would be interested simple due to that low caphit alone.

As for the "2nd+", obviously the need for a + will vary with how high the pick is in the 2nd round, and also which year the pick is in. A "+" can also vary quite dramatically in value, from a 3rd to 7th or from a B prospect to a throw-in C prospect... or no + at all if the 2nd is high.

Quoting: Mergus80
Grubauer cost the Avalanche a 2nd round pick and the Brooks Orpik buyout. He’s a couple years older but has proven he can be a starting goalie in that time. I’m not sure you can argue that he should be worth less now than he was 2 years ago. Maybe a saturated goalie market this offseason hurts his value a little bit. Regarding the injuries - goalies take wear and tear. I wouldn’t put too much stock into injury history unless it was something major. Part of it is just bad luck.

I’m curious about why you think it’s unlikely that Colorado trades for Murray? Multiple reporters have at least linked Colorado to Murray. He wouldn’t be my first choice if I were Sakic, but he’s an upgrade in my opinion.

The main reporter who has linked us to Murray is Adrian Dater, who has basically only been speculating without much actual evidence of interest. Ryan Clark is the Avs mouthpiece these days so Dater doesn't really have any insider information.

Sakic and Bednar also said yesterday in an interview that they are happy with the goalies, though they want to change their fitnes regime somewhat as both played injured in the playoffs. Obviously Sakic could be holding his cards close to his chest, but he's usually a pretty straight shooter and it doesn't sound like he's looking to change in net.

Moreover, Murray's contract demands and arbitration eligibility make him a less atractive solution compared to just sticking with Grubauer who has mostly been solid.

We also have Annunen in the pipeline who is looking really promising and has starter potential, so it doesn't really make sense to bring in a guy on a long-term contract. If we did make a change in net it would likely be someone with ~2 year term with a manageable caphit, like Kuemper for example, rather than Murray who will want $6m+ and 5 year+ term.
SankFeravalli a aimé ceci.
11 sept. 2020 à 10 h 33
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2015
Messages: 1,086
Mentions "j'aime": 324
Quoting: Richard88
As Mergus said below Grubauer's value has only gone up as he's proved he can be a starter. He may only have one year term, but he's still young enough where a long-term extension isn't hugely risky (as it is with other UFA 30+ goalies).

A big factor is also his caphit. For a starting goalie a $3.33m caphit is excellent value, especially in flat cap league. If we made him available I'm sure several teams would be interested simple due to that low caphit alone.

As for the "2nd+", obviously the need for a + will vary with how high the pick is in the 2nd round, and also which year the pick is in. A "+" can also vary quite dramatically in value, from a 3rd to 7th or from a B prospect to a throw-in C prospect... or no + at all if the 2nd is high.


The main reporter who has linked us to Murray is Adrian Dater, who has basically only been speculating without much actual evidence of interest. Ryan Clark is the Avs mouthpiece these days so Dater doesn't really have any insider information.

Sakic and Bednar also said yesterday in an interview that they are happy with the goalies, though they want to change their fitnes regime somewhat as both played injured in the playoffs. Obviously Sakic could be holding his cards close to his chest, but he's usually a pretty straight shooter and it doesn't sound like he's looking to change in net.

Moreover, Murray's contract demands and arbitration eligibility make him a less atractive solution compared to just sticking with Grubauer who has mostly been solid.

We also have Annunen in the pipeline who is looking really promising and has starter potential, so it doesn't really make sense to bring in a guy on a long-term contract. If we did make a change in net it would likely be someone with ~2 year term with a manageable caphit, like Kuemper for example, rather than Murray who will want $6m+ and 5 year+ term.


I’m a big fan of Ryan Clark. I get what you’re saying about Dater. Keep in mind he has been covering the team for a long time and I’m confident he’s still well connected. Without getting too much into my opinion on reporters, I think he throws out little bits that he gathers (maybe for clicks). But during the pause he did mention Colorado had interest in Murray at the deadline. There’s a Penguins reporter - I cant remember his name - who confirmed that rumor recently, and Frank Seravalli tweeted recently that Colorado is one of the teams that at least expressed interest in Matt Murray. Now a few reports about them being interested in a guy is far from a guarantee that Sakic will make the trade, but multiple reports suggest it’s on the table. And I would guess that they’re looking into other options too, even if they are “happy with their goaltenders.”

I don’t think Annunen would have much impact on their decision to upgrade in net. He’s their best goalie prospect in a long time, and if he works out it would be a big win for the organization. But they can’t bank on that. And he likely wouldn’t be NHL ready for at least 2-3 years, taking them past the MacKinnon contract window. Like you said, Kuemper would be an awesome fit in that respect. But I don’t think Annunen would/should stop them from adding a goalie with more than 2 or 3 years of term.
Richard88 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage