SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Is this enough to dump Johnson

Créé par: TheGuyInTheChair
Équipe: 2020-21 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 10 sept. 2020
Publié: 10 sept. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
iS tHIs ENoUgh gUYs? lOL i'D aDD AlL tHe 2024 pIcKS iF i cOuLD LOL
Transactions
CGY
  1. Johnson, Jack
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
  3. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
  4. Choix de 7e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
  5. Choix de 7e ronde en 2021 (ANA)
  6. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (PIT)
  7. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (PIT)
  8. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (PIT)
  9. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (PIT)
  10. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (PIT)
  11. Choix de 6e ronde en 2022 (PIT)
  12. Choix de 7e ronde en 2022 (PIT)
  13. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (PIT)
  14. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (PIT)
  15. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (PIT)
  16. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (PIT)
  17. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (PIT)
  18. Choix de 6e ronde en 2023 (PIT)
  19. Choix de 7e ronde en 2023 (PIT)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
2022
2023
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $73 003 508 $0 $982 500 $8 496 492 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
853 333 $853 333 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
10 sept. 2020 à 12 h 59
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,127
Mentions "j'aime": 448
Lol, you think JR will have 1st round picks
TheGuyInTheChair a aimé ceci.
10 sept. 2020 à 12 h 59
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,024
Mentions "j'aime": 1,017
Flames probably need another 6th rounder since you only offered two of them
10 sept. 2020 à 13 h 0
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 11,215
Mentions "j'aime": 5,212
Johnson is a brutal contract. It would take a first to dump him. Just the way she goes
Jeuck75 a aimé ceci.
10 sept. 2020 à 13 h 2
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 1,271
Mentions "j'aime": 581
Quoting: leafs101
Johnson is a brutal contract. It would take a first to dump him. Just the way she goes


Yeah just like it did with Gudbranson
Jeuck75 a aimé ceci.
10 sept. 2020 à 13 h 5
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 797
Mentions "j'aime": 432
"I question whether you have even looked at our trade block surplus. We could live with what you are sending us, but this is not ideal. Your offer is woefully insufficient when I consider value for what you are asking in return."
LeafsFanForSomeReason, leafs101, TheGuyInTheChair and 2 others a aimé ceci.
10 sept. 2020 à 13 h 8
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 11,215
Mentions "j'aime": 5,212
Quoting: the_guy_in_the_chair
Yeah just like it did with Gudbranson


difference is Gudbranson:
(a) had just 2 years on his contract left, while Johnson has 3
(b) was like 27 at the time and still had some potential upside to rebound a bit and for that reason could be seen as worth taking a chance on for a rebuilding team that doesn't need cap space, while Johnson is 33 and declining
Lenny7 et Rurik766 a aimé ceci.
10 sept. 2020 à 13 h 15
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 1,271
Mentions "j'aime": 581
Quoting: leafs101
difference is Gudbranson:
(a) had just 2 years on his contract left, while Johnson has 3
(b) was like 27 at the time and still had some potential upside to rebound a bit and for that reason could be seen as worth taking a chance on for a rebuilding team that doesn't need cap space, while Johnson is 33 and declining


Yeah so that means a 1st rounder for a guy whose $3 million against the cap? $2 million if you send him down. What trade are you basing that off of?
10 sept. 2020 à 13 h 15
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,382
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Quoting: the_guy_in_the_chair
Yeah just like it did with Gudbranson


Gudbranson is actually a competent NHL defenseman, just over paid, but on the right side of 30 and with a much shorter contract...
leafs101 et Rurik766 a aimé ceci.
10 sept. 2020 à 13 h 19
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 11,215
Mentions "j'aime": 5,212
Quoting: the_guy_in_the_chair
Yeah so that means a 1st rounder for a guy whose $3 million against the cap? $2 million if you send him down. What trade are you basing that off of?


3.25 million to sit in the press box for 3 years, or best case scenario be on a bad 3rd pair isn't something owners are willing to pay without a damn good reason. All the teams that spend a lot right now plan on being playoff teams in the next 3 years, and therefore don't want a long term cap dump. Less wealthy teams would have to be heavily incentivized to take him on. Any team that wants to be in the playoffs in the next 3 years won't want to take on 3 years of 3.25M being taken off their cap without a major bonus for doing so. Most owners also don't want to spend that kind of money on a buried contract in the AHL
BCAPP et Rurik766 a aimé ceci.
10 sept. 2020 à 13 h 21
#10
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: leafs101
difference is Gudbranson:
(a) had just 2 years on his contract left, while Johnson has 3
(b) was like 27 at the time and still had some potential upside to rebound a bit and for that reason could be seen as worth taking a chance on for a rebuilding team that doesn't need cap space, while Johnson is 33 and declining


Yup. Josh Manson was injured, and the Ducks were still clinging to hope.

Plus, good on GMBM for finding Gudbranson for nothing when the market for RD's was extremely limited (as it continues to be). His possession stats on a team that struggled defensively were actually very impressive.

Jack Johnson's numbers? Yikes.
leafs101, BCAPP et Rurik766 a aimé ceci.
10 sept. 2020 à 13 h 23
#11
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: the_guy_in_the_chair
Yeah so that means a 1st rounder for a guy whose $3 million against the cap? $2 million if you send him down. What trade are you basing that off of?


He's owed $8.25 million over the next 3 years. You realize that the team acquiring him still has to pay that, right? It's not really a case of "Oh heyyyy, let me help you create some cap space by taking Jack Johnson for absolutely nothing of value! I'll also cover the cash owed. Have a great day Jim!"
Rurik766 a aimé ceci.
10 sept. 2020 à 13 h 26
#12
Chiggy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,796
Mentions "j'aime": 590
Quoting: the_guy_in_the_chair
Yeah just like it did with Gudbranson


Gudbranson was a million times better than Johnson in Pittsburgh.
Lenny7 a aimé ceci.
10 sept. 2020 à 13 h 27
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 1,271
Mentions "j'aime": 581
Quoting: leafs101
3.25 million to sit in the press box for 3 years, or best case scenario be on a bad 3rd pair isn't something owners are willing to pay without a damn good reason. All the teams that spend a lot right now plan on being playoff teams in the next 3 years, and therefore don't want a long term cap dump. Less wealthy teams would have to be heavily incentivized to take him on. Any team that wants to be in the playoffs in the next 3 years won't want to take on 3 years of 3.25M being taken off their cap without a major bonus for doing so. Most owners also don't want to spend that kind of money on a buried contract in the AHL


Detroit is not going to be in the playoffs in the next two years at least. Same with Ottawa, and Anaheim. If the Penguins offered me a 3rd and a depth player I liked for Johnson I'd at least consider it since we don't need the cap space because we suck
10 sept. 2020 à 13 h 29
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 1,271
Mentions "j'aime": 581
Quoting: BCAPP
Gudbranson is actually a competent NHL defenseman, just over paid, but on the right side of 30 and with a much shorter contract...


Quoting: Lenny7
Yup. Josh Manson was injured, and the Ducks were still clinging to hope.

Plus, good on GMBM for finding Gudbranson for nothing when the market for RD's was extremely limited (as it continues to be). His possession stats on a team that struggled defensively were actually very impressive.

Jack Johnson's numbers? Yikes.


Quoting: Chigurrhh
Gudbranson was a million times better than Johnson in Pittsburgh.


That's not the point fellas. The point is I remember coming on this site every day and seeing trades for Gudbranson where we'd have to give up a bunch of assets to trade him because no one wanted him and he sucked and what do you know we gave up nothing to trade him. We're not getting a 7th for Johnson because Gudbranson has more value but saying we have to give up a 1st to get rid of Johnson is ridiculous. I'd rather just send him down and free up $1 million that way
10 sept. 2020 à 13 h 31
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,382
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Quoting: the_guy_in_the_chair
Detroit is not going to be in the playoffs in the next two years at least. Same with Ottawa, and Anaheim. If the Penguins offered me a 3rd and a depth player I liked for Johnson I'd at least consider it since we don't need the cap space because we suck


At least for Ottawa it isn't just the cap. It's the money.
10 sept. 2020 à 13 h 33
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 1,271
Mentions "j'aime": 581
Quoting: Lenny7
He's owed $8.25 million over the next 3 years. You realize that the team acquiring him still has to pay that, right? It's not really a case of "Oh heyyyy, let me help you create some cap space by taking Jack Johnson for absolutely nothing of value! I'll also cover the cash owed. Have a great day Jim!"


Yeah at an annual cap hit of like $2 million if you send him down. Who the hell is Detroit gonna sign for $2 million that would put them in the playoffs in the next three years?
10 sept. 2020 à 13 h 33
#17
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 1,271
Mentions "j'aime": 581
Quoting: BCAPP
At least for Ottawa it isn't just the cap. It's the money.


Well yeah maybe not Ottawa since Melnyk is a stinky hat
BCAPP a aimé ceci.
10 sept. 2020 à 13 h 37
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 11,215
Mentions "j'aime": 5,212
Quoting: the_guy_in_the_chair
Detroit is not going to be in the playoffs in the next two years at least. Same with Ottawa, and Anaheim. If the Penguins offered me a 3rd and a depth player I liked for Johnson I'd at least consider it since we don't need the cap space because we suck


Detroit has guys like Larkin and Bertuzzi and Mantha and Hronek to resign over the next 3 years. I think they are much closer to being good that people think. Ottawa is definitely much closer than people think, and in 2 or 3 years absolutely should be competing for a playoff spot - but regardless, why would Melnyk spend money on JJ? Anaheim is also much closer than people think, with Zegras - Steel - Lundstrom down the middle. They absolutely should have faith that their rebuild will stay on track and that they'll compete for playoffs in 2-3 years, especially if they get Drysdale/Rossi/Raymond at #6. If there was considerable incentive such as a 1st rounder or at least a 2nd + B level prospect
10 sept. 2020 à 13 h 39
#19
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: the_guy_in_the_chair
Yeah at an annual cap hit of like $2 million if you send him down. Who the hell is Detroit gonna sign for $2 million that would put them in the playoffs in the next three years?


...but they still have to pay him $8.25 million...That's a lot of money for a guy that isn't going to do F all for the team that aquires him. You're talking as if it's just a cap hit. It's not.
10 sept. 2020 à 13 h 40
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 263
Mentions "j'aime": 44
Just want to point out that I find it funny that the father/son avatars are arguing with each other.
BCAPP, TheGuyInTheChair, Lenny7 and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
10 sept. 2020 à 13 h 43
#21
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 1,271
Mentions "j'aime": 581
Quoting: leafs101
Detroit has guys like Larkin and Bertuzzi and Mantha and Hronek to resign over the next 3 years. I think they are much closer to being good that people think. Ottawa is definitely much closer than people think, and in 2 or 3 years absolutely should be competing for a playoff spot - but regardless, why would Melnyk spend money on JJ? Anaheim is also much closer than people think, with Zegras - Steel - Lundstrom down the middle. They absolutely should have faith that their rebuild will stay on track and that they'll compete for playoffs in 2-3 years, especially if they get Drysdale/Rossi/Raymond at #6. If there was considerable incentive such as a 1st rounder or at least a 2nd + B level prospect


Detroit had 39 points this year and you think they're close to contending. I'm done dude
10 sept. 2020 à 13 h 43
#22
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 1,271
Mentions "j'aime": 581
Quoting: Rurik766
Just want to point out that I find it funny that the father/son avatars are arguing with each other.


All we need is J-roc and the Roc pile to come in and this thread will officially be chaos
leafs101 a aimé ceci.
10 sept. 2020 à 13 h 46
#23
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 1,271
Mentions "j'aime": 581
Quoting: Lenny7
...but they still have to pay him $8.25 million...That's a lot of money for a guy that isn't going to do F all for the team that aquires him. You're talking as if it's just a cap hit. It's not.


Alright then I guess we'll just send him down then save $1 million and not have to give up a ****ing 1st rounder to get rid of a guy who makes $2 million a year.
10 sept. 2020 à 13 h 49
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 11,215
Mentions "j'aime": 5,212
Quoting: the_guy_in_the_chair
Detroit had 39 points this year and you think they're close to contending. I'm done dude


I don't think they are close to contending, but they're close to competing for a playoff spot. Avalanche went 22–56–4 in 82 games in 2016-17, look at them 2-3 years later. Great thing about this league is that successfully rebuilding through the draft is very effective.

They've got great young talent: top line C in Larkin, top line W's in Mantha, Bertuzzi, soon to be Zadina. Got Veleno coming up, and Fabbri as a great young 3rd liner. On D they've got Hronek and Seider, and they've got #4OA this year. If they finish bottom 3 again next year and get Aatu Raty or Owen Power as another top C/D and draft Drysdale/Rossi this year as another top C/D, I could absolutely see them competing for the playoffs by the last year of JJ's contract, and they'd probably want to add through FA to support this young core rather than spend on JJ
10 sept. 2020 à 13 h 50
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 11,215
Mentions "j'aime": 5,212
Quoting: Rurik766
Just want to point out that I find it funny that the father/son avatars are arguing with each other.


I mean its not rocket appliances of course nobody wants Jack Johnson. This "argument" should be water under the fridge already
Rurik766 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage