I’d say a second and a prospect like Fagemo

Bjornfot

Lol

Similar to Vrana or Ehlers

Really?!

Man that’s tough 😱

A late 1st/high 2nd and a good F prospect (Fagemo, Thomas, Kupari etc.)

That would be really tough... I know you have to give to get, but he projects to be Doughty future partner

I Might do the kings 2nd and Thomas

Kupari and Fagemo.

That’s too much IMO. Only because those players are already ahead of where that 2nd would be so 1/2 I say but not both.

I’ve always been a fan of Buch, what line did he play on this past year? Not sure with the addition of panarin

With kreider and mika mostly

Gotcha.

lol you asked. Yeah. Buch is a very very good 2way winger, even if you can't tell from his point totals. His analytics are ridiculous - similar to Vrana and Ehlers.

He didn't play with Panarin.

I would hope people aren’t asking for Turcotte, Vilardi or the 2nd overall pick lol.

The player trade I look at comparing his cost to the most would be a richer version of Andre Burakovsky, so likely a pair of 2nds or a 2nd and a B level prospect.

I knew he was good but I didn’t know to that level.

Hes been snakebitten this season to say the least

yeah this year was kinda a breakout for him. Defensive game has really come along nicely. Has an edge to him now to go along with his 6-4 frame, and always had the elite passing.

No, buch is nowhere near the level of those two

look at @sagecoll 's comment and you'll see how good Buch really is. He's a fringe top liner who creates many of his own oppurtinities. We aren't looking to trade him, at least not yet, considering that neither Kakko nor Kravtsov have taken major steps forward in their development. Buch will cost a late 1st + a good prospect, or a guy like Bjornfot.

Vrana and Buch have nearly the exact same career ppg
Ehlers boxcar stats are a little better, but Buch is much better analytically as show above...