SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Bye Strome Bye ADA Hello Cirelli

Créé par: buchiegang
Équipe: 2020-21 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 13 août 2020
Publié: 13 août 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1700 000 $
1700 000 $
1700 000 $
1700 000 $
21 750 000 $
22 750 000 $
54 750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
2700 000 $
22 750 000 $
1700 000 $
1700 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Lafreniere, Alexis
3925 000 $
Transactions
1.
NYR
  1. Smith, C.J.
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (BUF)
BUF
  1. Strome, Ryan [Droits de RFA]
2.
NYR
  1. Yelesin, Alexander
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (CGY)
CGY
  1. Deangelo, Anthony [Droits de RFA]
3.
NYR
  1. Cirelli, Anthony [Droits de RFA]
TBL
  1. Aaltonen, Leevi [Liste de réserve]
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (CAR)
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (OTT)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de NYR
Logo de CGY
Logo de BUF
Logo de NYR
Logo de DAL
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NSH
Logo de VAN
2021
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de BUF
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2022
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $74 274 799 $0 $8 787 500 $7 225 201 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Rangers de New York
11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Lafreniere, Alexis
925 000 $925 000 $
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 700 000 $5 700 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Rangers de New York
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
833 333 $833 333 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
700 000 $700 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
809 167 $809 167 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AD
UFA - 2

Unités spéciales

Avantage numérique 1
Avantage numérique 2
Lafreniere, A.
Infériorité numérique 1
Infériorité numérique 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
13 août 2020 à 15 h 28
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,705
Mentions "j'aime": 19,796
Flames and Bolts decline
cgy_flame_fan a aimé ceci.
13 août 2020 à 15 h 29
#2
Buffsbrain
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 575
Mentions "j'aime": 129
Didn't Tony D hold out to the hurricanes that he would only play for the blue shirts? Would be ironic if they shipped him out
13 août 2020 à 15 h 31
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,513
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
Quoting: Buffsbrain
Didn't Tony D hold out to the hurricanes that he would only play for the blue shirts? Would be ironic if they shipped him out


I thought that was Adam Fox
Buffsbrain a aimé ceci.
13 août 2020 à 15 h 31
#4
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: Buffsbrain
Didn't Tony D hold out to the hurricanes that he would only play for the blue shirts? Would be ironic if they shipped him out


No, Adam Fox did, who came from Calgary to Carolina ironically enough!
cgy_flame_fan et Buffsbrain a aimé ceci.
13 août 2020 à 15 h 32
#5
Démarrer sujet
Big Buch Energy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,624
Mentions "j'aime": 531
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Flames and Bolts decline


Elaborate...
13 août 2020 à 15 h 33
#6
Démarrer sujet
Big Buch Energy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,624
Mentions "j'aime": 531
Quoting: Buffsbrain
Didn't Tony D hold out to the hurricanes that he would only play for the blue shirts? Would be ironic if they shipped him out


As said by others above, that was Fox and he won't be going anywhere...
13 août 2020 à 15 h 34
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 1,018
Mentions "j'aime": 264
Quoting: SmugTkachuk
No, Adam Fox did, who came from Calgary to Carolina ironically enough!


didnt we trade him cause he wouldnt sign with us?
13 août 2020 à 15 h 35
#8
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: cgy_flame_fan
didnt we trade him cause he wouldnt sign with us?


Correct!
cgy_flame_fan a aimé ceci.
13 août 2020 à 15 h 36
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2017
Messages: 1,860
Mentions "j'aime": 762
Cirelli is the prototypical 2-way 2C that the Rangers need.
...but you slot him in on the 3rd line.
13 août 2020 à 15 h 38
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,705
Mentions "j'aime": 19,796
Quoting: buchiegang
Elaborate...


Sure, why would Tampa move their young 2C for a late 1st and a C level prospect?

Why would Calgary trade a top 20 pick for guy thats going to demand a huge raise when there are similar players on the FA market for free.
13 août 2020 à 15 h 39
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,731
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
Rangers decline the Flames/Sabres deals.
13 août 2020 à 15 h 41
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 1,018
Mentions "j'aime": 264
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Sure, why would Tampa move their young 2C for a late 1st and a C level prospect?

Why would Calgary trade a top 20 pick for guy thats going to demand a huge raise when there are similar players on the FA market for free.


yah, we could just sign tyson barrie
Ledge_And_Dairy a aimé ceci.
13 août 2020 à 15 h 45
#13
Démarrer sujet
Big Buch Energy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,624
Mentions "j'aime": 531
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Sure, why would Tampa move their young 2C for a late 1st and a C level prospect?

Why would Calgary trade a top 20 pick for guy thats going to demand a huge raise when there are similar players on the FA market for free.



Because they are cap strapped and need to pay there young defenseman at risk offersheets, and they are dealing from a postion of strength at C with Stamkos and Point...

First off, with how Calgary is playing, can't see their pick being in the top 20 (I personally think they'll make it to the WCF). And second, who is available on the UFA market? Barrie? Unless they think they can get Pietrangelo all the options at RHD are significantly less productive, older, and will cost UFA money (ADA should cost something like 4/5x5.25)
13 août 2020 à 15 h 47
#14
Démarrer sujet
Big Buch Energy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,624
Mentions "j'aime": 531
Quoting: Mike_Gartner
Cirelli is the prototypical 2-way 2C that the Rangers need.
...but you slot him in on the 3rd line.


Where the lines are redundant. The caliber of forwards the Rangers have in their top 9, those lines should be getting similar ice time. Plus Cirelli between Gauthier/Kravy and Laffy will mitigate any defensive issues they have as young, inexperienced players...
13 août 2020 à 15 h 48
#15
Démarrer sujet
Big Buch Energy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,624
Mentions "j'aime": 531
Quoting: Sagecoll
Rangers decline the Flames/Sabres deals.


Why exactly? Do you envision Strome will be getting more. Can't see it. I could see hoping to get more for ADA but it seems like Calgary fans think this is too steep already...
13 août 2020 à 15 h 49
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 1,464
Mentions "j'aime": 147
Cirelli I think gets close to the $6M AAV range and that warrants a 1+ a 3 if it is an offer sheet I believe. Trading away a 1+ a 4 + a C prospect should be similar value to a 1+3 no?
13 août 2020 à 15 h 50
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,705
Mentions "j'aime": 19,796
Quoting: buchiegang
Because they are cap strapped and need to pay there young defenseman at risk offersheets, and they are dealing from a postion of strength at C with Stamkos and Point...

First off, with how Calgary is playing, can't see their pick being in the top 20 (I personally think they'll make it to the WCF). And second, who is available on the UFA market? Barrie? Unless they think they can get Pietrangelo all the options at RHD are significantly less productive, older, and will cost UFA money (ADA should cost something like 4/5x5.25)


Offersheets are not something to ever worry about. Cirelli will be the last player moved of the 3 RFA's especially for a crappy return.

Calgary has to make the WCF for their pick to not be top 20. They may beat Dallas but they still have to go win the semifinals after that. Barrie, Gus, Piet, and Vatanen are all solid RD for a PP1 role. Not really sure what you mean by "UFA money" ADA will cost at least 5.5M to resign, probably 6M.
13 août 2020 à 15 h 51
#18
Démarrer sujet
Big Buch Energy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,624
Mentions "j'aime": 531
Quoting: Philu916
Cirelli I think gets close to the $6M AAV range and that warrants a 1+ a 3 if it is an offer sheet I believe. Trading away a 1+ a 4 + a C prospect should be similar value to a 1+3 no?


I suppose. I personally can't see him getting that with his offensive production. It isn't exactly barn burning. I'd rather overpay a little with assets to trade for him then overpay with cap space to offersheet him. It really doesn't do Tampa anything different because they are essentially getting the same return...
Philu916 a aimé ceci.
13 août 2020 à 16 h 0
#19
Démarrer sujet
Big Buch Energy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,624
Mentions "j'aime": 531
Modifié 13 août 2020 à 16 h 10
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Offersheets are not something to ever worry about. Cirelli will be the last player moved of the 3 RFA's especially for a crappy return.

Calgary has to make the WCF for their pick to not be top 20. They may beat Dallas but they still have to go win the semifinals after that. Barrie, Gus, Piet, and Vatanen are all solid RD for a PP1 role. Not really sure what you mean by "UFA money" ADA will cost at least 5.5M to resign, probably 6M.


Can't agree with that. Tampa will absolutely get offersheeted unless they clear significant cap (which will be very difficult considering the candidates for that's NMC/NTC clauses). To expect teams to not take advantage either through trades or offersheets is a bit naive. I personally think Cernak and Sergachev are far more important to TBL's long term success with Stammer and Point there for the long haul...

What I'm trying to say is DeAngelo is better then Barrie, Gustaffson and debatebly Vatanen. He is also significantly younger, he is entering his prime. He will also most likely be arounfd the same amount financially. So why pay the same price in cap for a less productive, older player? The player drafted at that first round pick in that range will likely not have an impact on the team for 2-3 years at best if at all. They have pieces like Pelltier, Dube, Valimaki, Kylington and Zavgordony. There prospect pool will survive without it.
13 août 2020 à 16 h 0
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,731
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
Quoting: buchiegang
Why exactly? Do you envision Strome will be getting more. Can't see it. I could see hoping to get more for ADA but it seems like Calgary fans think this is too steep already...


lol Strome put up a 70 point pace. Regardless of who you're on a line with, yeah you get a lot for that. More than what's here.
Deangelo was a top 10 Dman in the league this year. Literally. Take what you think would be appropriate compensation for Roman Josi. Anything less than that is an underpay.

Trust the numbers and you're rarely wrong.
13 août 2020 à 16 h 2
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 1,464
Mentions "j'aime": 147
Quoting: buchiegang
I suppose. I personally can't see him getting that with his offensive production. It isn't exactly barn burning. I'd rather overpay a little with assets to trade for him then overpay with cap space to offersheet him. It really doesn't do Tampa anything different because they are essentially getting the same return...

Isn’t he there 3C for now? Obviously a little different playoff wise with stammer out. 53 pt pace for a 3C is pretty good. Put him on line 2 with Panarin and am fairly certain he would put up more points than Strome.
13 août 2020 à 16 h 6
#22
Démarrer sujet
Big Buch Energy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,624
Mentions "j'aime": 531
Quoting: Sagecoll
lol Strome put up a 70 point pace. Regardless of who you're on a line with, yeah you get a lot for that. More than what's here.
Deangelo was a top 10 Dman in the league this year. Literally. Take what you think would be appropriate compensation for Roman Josi. Anything less than that is an underpay.

Trust the numbers and you're rarely wrong.


True but teams are not trading for Strome w/ Panarin. They/re trading for the player Ryan Strome has been his entire career a middle 6, playmaking C. That is fair value...

This I can understand more. However, the key point is "this year." We have all seen flash and in the pan one year wonders in the league (see above). Teams will not pay a premium elite d-man price in a trade for ADA unless he shows he can play that way consistently. And I'm happy to keep him (for now) if we can find him the minutes
13 août 2020 à 16 h 7
#23
Démarrer sujet
Big Buch Energy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,624
Mentions "j'aime": 531
Quoting: Philu916
Isn’t he there 3C for now? Obviously a little different playoff wise with stammer out. 53 pt pace for a 3C is pretty good. Put him on line 2 with Panarin and am fairly certain he would put up more points than Strome.


At first glance yes but I think Stammer played a lot of LW this year, slotting Point and Cirelli up...
Philu916 a aimé ceci.
13 août 2020 à 16 h 14
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,705
Mentions "j'aime": 19,796
Quoting: buchiegang
Can't agree with that. Tampa will absolutely get offersheeted unless they clear significant cap (which will be very difficult considering the candidates for that's NMC/NTC clauses). To expect teams to not take advantage either through trades or offersheets is a bit naive. I personally think Cernak and Sergachev are far more important to TBL's long term success with Stammer and Point there for the long haul...

What I'm trying to say is DeAngelo is better then Barrie, Gustaffson and debatebly Vatanen. He is also significantly younger, he is entering his prime. He will also most likely be arounfd the smae ocst financially. So why pay the the same price in cap for a less productive, older player? The player drafted at that first round pick at that range will likely not have an impact on the team for 2-3 years at best. They have pieces like Pelltier, Dube, Valimaki, Kylington and Zavgordony. There prospect pool will survive without it.


Players will receive offer sheets sure but that's up to the player if they would rather sign with an inferior team for a very slight increase in pay. Last year Tampa was "screwed" too and got away with a 1st for Miller. Thinking they can't move contracts is also naive. If you want Cirelli offer Chytil and Lundkvist at the least.

You seem confused here, Barrie + #19 >>>>> DeAngelo. 3 of those prospects listed are on the Flames starting roster next year 3 of them are LW's and 2 are LD. Flames really need a good center prospect and/or a good RD prospect.
13 août 2020 à 16 h 19
#25
Démarrer sujet
Big Buch Energy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,624
Mentions "j'aime": 531
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Players will receive offer sheets sure but that's up to the player if they would rather sign with an inferior team for a very slight increase in pay. Last year Tampa was "screwed" too and got away with a 1st for Miller. Thinking they can't move contracts is also naive. If you want Cirelli offer Chytil and Lundkvist at the least.

You seem confused here, Barrie + #19 >>>>> DeAngelo. 3 of those prospects listed are on the Flames starting roster next year 3 of them are LW's and 2 are LD. Flames really need a good center prospect and/or a good RD prospect.


Hah! Chytil and Ludnkvist for Cirelli in your dreams! But at any rate I hope it works out for you. If I was Cirelli I'd rather play with Panarin then Alex Killorn but that's me...

Isn't Pelltier a C?
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage