SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Ideas for Voracek Trade

Créé par: DirtyDangles
Équipe: 2016-17 Équipe personnalisée
Date de création initiale: 30 août 2016
Publié: 30 août 2016
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
What would your team be willing to give up for Voracek?
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
173 000 000 $8 250 000 $0 $0 $64 750 000 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 8
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
30 août 2016 à 15 h 31
#1
Potvin Sucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 42
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Absolutely nothing thank you very much
30 août 2016 à 15 h 33
#2
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 13,508
Mentions "j'aime": 3,060
Quoting: NYR_99
Absolutely nothing thank you very much


Kind of made this for those who would maybe like him. Thanks for adding nothing.
30 août 2016 à 15 h 45
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 8,230
Mentions "j'aime": 3,643
Nothing from the Wild too. He's not a $8m player imo.
30 août 2016 à 15 h 46
#4
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 13,508
Mentions "j'aime": 3,060
Quoting: wabit
Nothing from the Wild too. He's not a $8m player imo.


I agree wholeheartedly. Would likely need to be a team with some cap space like Carolina
30 août 2016 à 16 h 11
#5
Proficiency
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 71
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Needs to have a better year this year. Otherwise I think he's staying or you are trading him for something you wouldn't want.
30 août 2016 à 16 h 15
#6
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 13,508
Mentions "j'aime": 3,060
Quoting: Proficiency
Needs to have a better year this year. Otherwise I think he's staying or you are trading him for something you wouldn't want.


I think if he has a bad year we try and trade him an if no takers, we don't protect him. Would be a solid building block for Vegas
30 août 2016 à 16 h 17
#7
Proficiency
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 71
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Quoting: DirtyDangles
Quoting: Proficiency
Needs to have a better year this year. Otherwise I think he's staying or you are trading him for something you wouldn't want.


I think if he has a bad year we try and trade him an if no takers, we don't protect him. Would be a solid building block for Vegas


That would look really bad for you guys
30 août 2016 à 16 h 21
#8
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 13,508
Mentions "j'aime": 3,060
Quoting: Proficiency
Quoting: DirtyDangles
Quoting: Proficiency
Needs to have a better year this year. Otherwise I think he's staying or you are trading him for something you wouldn't want.


I think if he has a bad year we try and trade him an if no takers, we don't protect him. Would be a solid building block for Vegas


That would look really bad for you guys


I am hoping he has a good year, but I think even if he gets to 65 points we try and move him since he will then be valuable. That contract is just monstrous.
30 août 2016 à 16 h 21
#9
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 13,508
Mentions "j'aime": 3,060
Quoting: Proficiency
Quoting: DirtyDangles
Quoting: Proficiency
Needs to have a better year this year. Otherwise I think he's staying or you are trading him for something you wouldn't want.


I think if he has a bad year we try and trade him an if no takers, we don't protect him. Would be a solid building block for Vegas


That would look really bad for you guys


I am hoping he has a good year, but I think even if he gets to 65 points we try and move him since he will then be valuable. That contract is just monstrous.
30 août 2016 à 16 h 21
#10
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 13,508
Mentions "j'aime": 3,060
Quoting: Proficiency
Quoting: DirtyDangles
Quoting: Proficiency
Needs to have a better year this year. Otherwise I think he's staying or you are trading him for something you wouldn't want.


I think if he has a bad year we try and trade him an if no takers, we don't protect him. Would be a solid building block for Vegas


That would look really bad for you guys


I am hoping he has a good year, but I think even if he gets to 65 points we try and move him since he will then be valuable. That contract is just monstrous.
30 août 2016 à 16 h 33
#11
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 61,164
Mentions "j'aime": 23,564
Ranger fans should have plenty of ideas.....after all many of them are able to trade the contracts of Nash, Staal and Girardi easily.
My opinion is that probably no one in the East Conference would help the Flyers and there just aren't many teams that would want the contract without giving money back to the Flyers.

It's too bad the the Canucks signed Ericsson...maybe they would have taken Vorachek....in exchange for very little. At the least the Flyers would have cap space.
There will be very few "scorers" available to the Vegans. Maybe he has a good year and he's taken in the draft.
30 août 2016 à 16 h 36
#12
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 13,508
Mentions "j'aime": 3,060
Quoting: palhal
Ranger fans should have plenty of ideas.....after all many of them are able to trade the contracts of Nash, Staal and Girardi easily.
My opinion is that probably no one in the East Conference would help the Flyers and there just aren't many teams that would want the contract without giving money back to the Flyers.

It's too bad the the Canucks signed Ericsson...maybe they would have taken Vorachek....in exchange for very little. At the least the Flyers would have cap space.
There will be very few "scorers" available to the Vegans. Maybe he has a good year and he's taken in the draft.


Those were my thoughts exactly about the Canucks.
30 août 2016 à 17 h 7
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 19,713
Mentions "j'aime": 6,850
MTL offers Nikita Scherbak, 2nd rounder 2017, Emelin and Desharnais for Voracek. No salary retained.
30 août 2016 à 20 h 10
#14
Hardcore Sabres fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 7,960
Mentions "j'aime": 1,222
Modifié 30 août 2016 à 20 h 17
Sabres give Moulson, 2017 2nd round pick, and 2018 2nd round pick for Voracek.
30 août 2016 à 22 h 46
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 19,713
Mentions "j'aime": 6,850
Quoting: Zach
Sabres give Moulson, 2017 2nd round pick, and 2018 2nd round pick for Voracek.


My offer is better! Sticking Out Tongue
30 août 2016 à 23 h 40
#16
Hardcore Sabres fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 7,960
Mentions "j'aime": 1,222
Quoting: F50marco
Quoting: Zach
Sabres give Moulson, 2017 2nd round pick, and 2018 2nd round pick for Voracek.


My offer is better! Sticking Out Tongue
yeah, I knowcool. Was wondering does anyone know if Voracek can also play LW?
30 août 2016 à 23 h 43
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 19,713
Mentions "j'aime": 6,850
Quoting: Zach
Quoting: F50marco
Quoting: Zach
Sabres give Moulson, 2017 2nd round pick, and 2018 2nd round pick for Voracek.


My offer is better! Sticking Out Tongue
yeah, I knowcool. Was wondering does anyone know if Voracek can also play LW?


DirtyDangles probably knows best. I would think he could still be effective on his off wing. I'd prefer to play him where he is most comfortable though.
31 août 2016 à 0 h 3
#18
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 13,508
Mentions "j'aime": 3,060
Honestly, as a Flyer I can't remember him ever being on LW so I would lean to no.
31 août 2016 à 0 h 6
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 19,713
Mentions "j'aime": 6,850
Quoting: DirtyDangles
Honestly, as a Flyer I can't remember him ever being on LW so I would lean to no.


Ok.

Soooooo what about the trade offer? Take Emelin and DD off our hands for this year and next and we'll give you a former 1st rounder and a 2nd rounder this year. on top of taking Voracek's contract off your hands.
31 août 2016 à 0 h 10
#20
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 13,508
Mentions "j'aime": 3,060
I think we would need a top 6 guy in return. In my "16/17 Hextall wants..." trade I threw in a 1st and 3rd for Skinner and 2 2nds. I think that kind of thing would do it. Carolina would get a fairly high pick (Top 15 likely.) Skinner is good but hasn't performed like he should so Flyers and Canes are selling low, the Canes just get that 1st for taking cap
31 août 2016 à 0 h 25
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 19,713
Mentions "j'aime": 6,850
Quoting: DirtyDangles
I think we would need a top 6 guy in return. In my "16/17 Hextall wants..." trade I threw in a 1st and 3rd for Skinner and 2 2nds. I think that kind of thing would do it. Carolina would get a fairly high pick (Top 15 likely.) Skinner is good but hasn't performed like he should so Flyers and Canes are selling low, the Canes just get that 1st for taking cap


Geez not too long ago you wanted to lose him for nothing now you want Skinner and 2 seconds? I mean that makes more sense, I just don't know how you can go from No Voracek to Voracek for Skinner (essentially)
31 août 2016 à 0 h 30
#22
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 13,508
Mentions "j'aime": 3,060
I over-reacted to his bad year...he still got 55 points. I think I was worried about Cap at that point but after doing many teams we have the cap to keep him no problem.
31 août 2016 à 1 h 25
#23
Hardcore Sabres fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 7,960
Mentions "j'aime": 1,222
Quoting: DirtyDangles
Honestly, as a Flyer I can't remember him ever being on LW so I would lean to no.
what do you think about my trade offer, and if you don't like it, what do you think it would take?
31 août 2016 à 1 h 46
#24
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 13,508
Mentions "j'aime": 3,060
Moulson just isn't what we would need. Maybe if Buffalo really wants to move Kane after his off ice issues we could work something around that. Maybe Simmonds could smack some sense into his dumb ass.
31 août 2016 à 2 h 23
#25
Hardcore Sabres fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 7,960
Mentions "j'aime": 1,222
Quoting: DirtyDangles
Moulson just isn't what we would need. Maybe if Buffalo really wants to move Kane after his off ice issues we could work something around that. Maybe Simmonds could smack some sense into his dumb ass.
I really don't want to give up Kane, but could Simmonds come and smack some sense into him anyway? Would adding Fasching to the Moulson trade make any difference to you?
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage