SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Anaheim

Créé par: SmugTkachuk
Équipe: 2020-21 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 17 juill. 2020
Publié: 17 juill. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Let me preface by saying I absolutely love Noah Hanifin and want to see him a Flame for a very long time. I don't think I would part with Valimaki yet and Kylington is not enough.

DUCKS FANS: is there a way you could see a trade invloving Kylington and a first or second for Rakell?
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1800 000 $
11 000 000 $
22 000 000 $
1700 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
33 000 000 $
1700 000 $
1700 000 $
12 950 000 $
1700 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
Transactions
CGY
  1. Rakell, Rickard
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (ANA)
Détails additionnels:
Pick helps offsets contract length
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de SJS
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2021
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de ANA
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $70 127 305 $0 $882 500 $11 372 695 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 463 139 $2 463 139 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 950 000 $2 950 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
17 juill. 2020 à 11 h 29
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 5,145
Mentions "j'aime": 5,953
Ducks dont need LHD they have too many already
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
17 juill. 2020 à 11 h 30
#2
Brace for the Storm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 12,840
Mentions "j'aime": 6,647
ANA rejects they have too many LHDs
SmugTkachuk et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
17 juill. 2020 à 11 h 33
#3
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: Salzy
Ducks dont need LHD they have too many already


Correct, my bad, I am completely backwards on that. Thanks!
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
17 juill. 2020 à 11 h 45
#4
CGY
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2015
Messages: 5,544
Mentions "j'aime": 2,066
The Flames need another C more-so than a RW. They need to have 3 functional lines, right now they only have 2
17 juill. 2020 à 11 h 49
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 3,902
Mentions "j'aime": 1,760
Flames D is looking a little thin after that trade, losing TJ and Hamonic to free agency. I read your explanation so I know what you are doing, but Hanifin should stay put. also, puck moving D like Gustafsson rarely sign cheap deals like that, even coming off a bad year.
17 juill. 2020 à 11 h 53
#6
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: ItWasIn
The Flames need another C more-so than a RW. They need to have 3 functional lines, right now they only have 2


I agree with that, always like Rakell could be a good fit but certainly not a priority. Who would be your top targets for a C this offseason?
17 juill. 2020 à 11 h 58
#7
CGY
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2015
Messages: 5,544
Mentions "j'aime": 2,066
Quoting: SmugTkachuk
I agree with that, always like Rakell could be a good fit but certainly not a priority. Who would be your top targets for a C this offseason?


I would try for Cirelli, D. Strome, Domi.

I'd play the new C with Tkachuk, then put Dube with Backlund
17 juill. 2020 à 11 h 58
#8
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: masterjuddi
Flames D is looking a little thin after that trade, losing TJ and Hamonic to free agency. I read your explanation so I know what you are doing, but Hanifin should stay put. also, puck moving D like Gustafsson rarely sign cheap deals like that, even coming off a bad year.


In my absolute perfect world the Flames D next year is:
Hanifin - Andersson
Giordano - Gustaffson
Valimaki - Hamonic

What I think we will realistically see is:
Giordano - Brodie
Hanifin - Andersson
Valimaki - Kylington

I think I may be a little low on Gus but I don't think it is too far off as he was moved for a third round pick at the deadline, I do agree with you that his position and style can demand a little more which I think I would be willing to give as opposed to overpaying an older Brodie who plays a similar style.
masterjuddi a aimé ceci.
17 juill. 2020 à 11 h 59
#9
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: ItWasIn
I would try for Cirelli, D. Strome, Domi.

I'd play the new C with Tkachuk, then put Dube with Backlund


Love the Dube Backlund idea. Ideally you'd like to see Backlund as a 3C this year?
17 juill. 2020 à 12 h 1
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 3,902
Mentions "j'aime": 1,760
Quoting: SmugTkachuk
In my absolute perfect world the Flames D next year is:
Hanifin - Andersson
Giordano - Gustaffson
Valimaki - Hamonic

What I think we will realistically see is:
Giordano - Brodie
Hanifin - Andersson
Valimaki - Kylington

I think I may be a little low on Gus but I don't think it is too far off as he was moved for a third round pick at the deadline, I do agree with you that his position and style can demand a little more which I think I would be willing to give as opposed to overpaying an older Brodie who plays a similar style.


They do need a guy or two to come back as buffers to the young D that are coming up. I wonder what Brodie and Hamonic will fetch on the open market? I like them both, but they'll both be looking at their last "big" deals. I imagine Brodie's starts with a 5 and Hamonic around 4.5.
17 juill. 2020 à 12 h 9
#11
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: masterjuddi
They do need a guy or two to come back as buffers to the young D that are coming up. I wonder what Brodie and Hamonic will fetch on the open market? I like them both, but they'll both be looking at their last "big" deals. I imagine Brodie's starts with a 5 and Hamonic around 4.5.


I think those numbers are definitely accurate and if I am looking at Brodie over 5 and Gustafsson under 4 I think I am going with the latter, would love to see Hamonic back in a third pairing role for 2-3 years.
masterjuddi a aimé ceci.
17 juill. 2020 à 12 h 11
#12
Kresco
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 171
Mentions "j'aime": 49
Quoting: ItWasIn
The Flames need another C more-so than a RW. They need to have 3 functional lines, right now they only have 2


How do you figure that??? Flames very openly were searching for a top 6 RW. At C we have Monahan lindholm (natural position) backlund Ryan jankowski Bennett. At RW we have Lindholm out of necessity and mangi who is actually a LW but once again playing RW out of necessity
17 juill. 2020 à 12 h 50
#13
Xx_Zegras46_xX
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 3,960
Mentions "j'aime": 1,658
Ducks don’t need more LHD
17 juill. 2020 à 12 h 52
#14
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: HadesOfSoCal
Ducks don’t need more LHD


Mentioned multiple times already
17 juill. 2020 à 12 h 58
#15
Xx_Zegras46_xX
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 3,960
Mentions "j'aime": 1,658
Quoting: SmugTkachuk
Mentioned multiple times already


Just sayin
17 juill. 2020 à 14 h 2
#16
CGY
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2015
Messages: 5,544
Mentions "j'aime": 2,066
Quoting: Kresco
How do you figure that??? Flames very openly were searching for a top 6 RW. At C we have Monahan lindholm (natural position) backlund Ryan jankowski Bennett. At RW we have Lindholm out of necessity and mangi who is actually a LW but once again playing RW out of necessity


Flames also almost landed Kadri, so there’s that.

Backlund is 31, a decline is coming sooner than you think. Who’s a top 6 C in the system? I don’t see one. Ryan has 1 year left at soon to be 34. Jankowksi will be gone and Bennett has proven he’s not an NHL C
17 juill. 2020 à 14 h 3
#17
Yeah Baby
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 1,370
Mentions "j'aime": 322
Quoting: ItWasIn
Flames also almost landed Kadri, so there’s that.

Backlund is 31, a decline is coming sooner than you think. Who’s a top 6 C in the system? I don’t see one. Ryan has 1 year left at soon to be 34. Jankowksi will be gone and Bennett has proven he’s not an NHL C


They really need to play Dube as a C, he is smart enough, fast enough, and is responsible defensively.
17 juill. 2020 à 14 h 8
#18
CGY
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2015
Messages: 5,544
Mentions "j'aime": 2,066
Quoting: BurnEmUp
They really need to play Dube as a C, he is smart enough, fast enough, and is responsible defensively.


They don't see him as C though. Burke has said before on sportsnet that when they drafted him it was with the belief he's an NHL LW. This is proven by Dube being exactly 0% in the faceoff circle this year
17 juill. 2020 à 14 h 11
#19
Yeah Baby
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 1,370
Mentions "j'aime": 322
Quoting: ItWasIn
They don't see him as C though. Burke has said before on sportsnet that when they drafted him it was with the belief he's an NHL LW. This is proven by Dube being exactly 0% in the faceoff circle this year


Well he took 2 face offs haha

I don't remember Burke saying that, interesting.
17 juill. 2020 à 14 h 15
#20
CGY
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2015
Messages: 5,544
Mentions "j'aime": 2,066
Quoting: BurnEmUp
Well he took 2 face offs haha

I don't remember Burke saying that, interesting.


It was on the 960 morning show, probably around December. I know he only took 2 draws, but I think that further illustrates, they think of him as a LW/RW.

If they don't make a move to add a C via trade, I think they really need to consider drafting one in the 1st round this year.

I think Gawdin is an NHLer, but a Trevor Lewis/Derek Ryan type, bottom 6er. Ruzicka has gotten a lot of love the last few weeks, but I need to see a little more from him
BurnEmUp a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage