SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

What's next for the Cats with all that cap space?

Créé par: alwaysnextyear
Équipe: 2016-17 Panthers de la Floride
Date de création initiale: 25 août 2016
Publié: 25 août 2016
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
NYR
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2017 (FLA)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2018 (FLA)
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2017
Logo de FLA
Logo de FLA
Logo de ARI
Logo de FLA
Logo de ANA
2018
Logo de FLA
Logo de ARI
Logo de FLA
Logo de FLA
Logo de FLA
2019
Logo de FLA
Logo de FLA
Logo de FLA
Logo de FLA
Logo de FLA
Logo de FLA
Logo de FLA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2373 000 000 $63 508 333 $1 420 000 $4 749 500 $9 491 667 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
5 900 000 $5 900 000 $
C
UFA - 6
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 515 000 $$2M)
AD
UFA - 1
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 6
3 425 000 $3 425 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
C, AG
UFA - 2
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 5
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
950 000 $950 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
600 000 $600 000 $ (Bonis de performance172 000 $$172K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
6 350 000 $6 350 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
DD
UFA - 1
4 533 333 $4 533 333 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 6
2 040 000 $2 040 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
3 937 500 $3 937 500 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
G
UFA - 5
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
25 août 2016 à 15 h 57
#1
Out
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 982
Mentions "j'aime": 65
Haha, this is a Rick Roll!
25 août 2016 à 15 h 58
#2
Out
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 982
Mentions "j'aime": 65
Honestly tho, seems like they are setting up for some fat extensions to Petrovic and Huberdeau. Cap space this year can be used to pick up rentals.
25 août 2016 à 16 h 15
#3
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,804
Mentions "j'aime": 9,996
So much room for activities!

NYR are looking to rid themselves of Nash's contract. It's not that he's finished...just a bad contract and they need cap space. You could honestly get him for less.
25 août 2016 à 16 h 28
#4
Rangers R nice
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 46
Mentions "j'aime": 1
Quoting: exo2769
So much room for activities!

NYR are looking to rid themselves of Nash's contract. It's not that he's finished...just a bad contract and they need cap space. You could honestly get him for less.


Eh, I wouldn't say NYR NEED to dump Nash, they're just trying to trim excess. He's very important to our entire team. He logs plenty of 5v5, PK, and PP time, and does all of them very well. That being said, I think the Ranger would be more than willing to move him, with salary retained even, for some picks and prospects.

I personally would like Pysyk, but you guys literally JUST acquired him from BUF so I doubt he goes anywhere.

That being said, I think a 2nd and a 3rd is a big underpayment for him.
25 août 2016 à 16 h 42
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 19,613
Mentions "j'aime": 6,747
Quoting: dogboy1
Quoting: exo2769
So much room for activities!

NYR are looking to rid themselves of Nash's contract. It's not that he's finished...just a bad contract and they need cap space. You could honestly get him for less.


Eh, I wouldn't say NYR NEED to dump Nash, they're just trying to trim excess. He's very important to our entire team. He logs plenty of 5v5, PK, and PP time, and does all of them very well. That being said, I think the Ranger would be more than willing to move him, with salary retained even, for some picks and prospects.

I personally would like Pysyk, but you guys literally JUST acquired him from BUF so I doubt he goes anywhere.

That being said, I think a 2nd and a 3rd is a big underpayment for him.


I tend to agree but having a team take 2 years of 7.8M a year off your cap is an expensive proposition and one only a few teams can actually do. The reason NYR would want to retain some of that salary is to maximize their return. Retain enough salary so that Nash's contract is worth what he should be paid right now and you'll get what Nash value is back in return. (In theory obviously)
25 août 2016 à 19 h 1
#6
Trade is one for one
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 210
Mentions "j'aime": 11
First off, I'm a Rangers fan. I am not taking that deal. Nash is an elite player, and even with his contract, he is valuable to the team. The only reason there has been speculation over a Nash trade is our weakness in defense and our cap situation. The thing is, we only have 1 big extension coming up until Nash's contract expires: Zibanejad. So if the return is not good, I'd rather keep Nash. The Rangers are able to absorb a big chunk of his salary to maximize the return, like marco says. But that return needs to be an NHL defenseman (preferably a puck-moving RHD) and picks/prospects. Otherwise, we're better off keeping him.
25 août 2016 à 19 h 26
#7
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 60,081
Mentions "j'aime": 23,007
What the Panthers will do with all that cap space? Not wasting it on Nash. Smith gets a raise to 5m next year, Ekblad to 7.5m plus Huberneau, Pysuk, Petrovic still to be resigned.

Rangers should take that offer. Almost all GMs in the NHL, hell almost all GMs on Cap Friendly could spend 7.8m a year better than on Nash. Maybe you can't find the guys to replace this year, but next summer you could do it easily
26 août 2016 à 12 h 10
#8
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,804
Mentions "j'aime": 9,996
Modifié 26 août 2016 à 13 h 47
Quoting: Bwells
First off, I'm a Rangers fan. I am not taking that deal. Nash is an elite player, and even with his contract, he is valuable to the team. The only reason there has been speculation over a Nash trade is our weakness in defense and our cap situation. The thing is, we only have 1 big extension coming up until Nash's contract expires: Zibanejad. So if the return is not good, I'd rather keep Nash. The Rangers are able to absorb a big chunk of his salary to maximize the return, like marco says. But that return needs to be an NHL defenseman (preferably a puck-moving RHD) and picks/prospects. Otherwise, we're better off keeping him.


The $7.8M cap space shouldn't only be thought about as Nash's cap hit, but as a team cap hit in whole. Think you could have kept Yandle or even signed another Dman? You're right that the NYR weakness is D and the NYR could address that weakness with extra cap space. I know Nash is still a viable player, but he's not really elite. Quite frankly, he doesn't play that much defense. He's still a really good goal scorer when healthy.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage