SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Blockbuster

Créé par: ZiggyPalffy
Équipe: 2020-21 Predators de Nashville
Date de création initiale: 30 avr. 2020
Publié: 17 mai 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2900 000 $
2700 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
2700 000 $
42 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
NSH
ANA
  1. Turris, Kyle
Détails additionnels:
CBO
2.
NYR
  1. Afanasyev, Egor
  2. Magwood, Zachary
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (NSH)
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de NSH
Logo de NJD
Logo de NSH
Logo de MIN
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
2021
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
2022
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $74 621 143 $0 $3 700 000 $6 878 857 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Predators de Nashville
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Predators de Nashville
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Predators de Nashville
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Predators de Nashville
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 6
Logo de Predators de Nashville
894 167 $894 167 $
AG, AD
RFA - 4
Logo de Predators de Nashville
2 857 143 $2 857 143 $
C, AD
UFA - 6
Logo de Predators de Nashville
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Predators de Nashville
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Predators de Nashville
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Predators de Nashville
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Predators de Nashville
9 059 000 $9 059 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Predators de Nashville
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Predators de Nashville
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Predators de Nashville
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 1
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Predators de Nashville
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Predators de Nashville
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
17 mai 2020 à 22 h 57
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,778
Mentions "j'aime": 19,832
Who do they protect in expansion?
17 mai 2020 à 23 h 4
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 4,812
Mentions "j'aime": 2,012
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Who do they protect in expansion?


Fantstic question.

Follow up: why not try and peel Kris Russell from Edmonton on an expiring deal, WHICH would not bury Fabbro in the line up?? Less cost is assets, protection worries removed, and he is pretty damn effective.
17 mai 2020 à 23 h 16
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 41
Mentions "j'aime": 12
Quoting: swinny
Fantstic question.

Follow up: why not try and peel Kris Russell from Edmonton on an expiring deal, WHICH would not bury Fabbro in the line up?? Less cost is assets, protection worries removed, and he is pretty damn effective.
I’m honestly confused how does acquiring kris Russell solve the problem of who they’ll protect, the only thing I see is they would have to make a deal with Seattle so that they will take Russell but they could just make a deal with them so that they’ll take some other random fringe player instead and not have to waste assets on a guy that isn’t even going to play
17 mai 2020 à 23 h 20
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,778
Mentions "j'aime": 19,832
Quoting: Grayne_Wetzky
I’m honestly confused how does acquiring kris Russell solve the problem of who they’ll protect, the only thing I see is they would have to make a deal with Seattle so that they will take Russell but they could just make a deal with them so that they’ll take some other random fringe player instead and not have to waste assets on a guy that isn’t even going to play


Russell is a UFA next year He's not remotely relevant to the expansion
17 mai 2020 à 23 h 23
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,778
Mentions "j'aime": 19,832
Quoting: swinny
Fantstic question.

Follow up: why not try and peel Kris Russell from Edmonton on an expiring deal, WHICH would not bury Fabbro in the line up?? Less cost is assets, protection worries removed, and he is pretty damn effective.


I could see something around Russell + for Bonino
17 mai 2020 à 23 h 32
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 4,812
Mentions "j'aime": 2,012
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
I could see something around Russell + for Bonino


See it too as a straight up deal.
18 mai 2020 à 0 h 42
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,778
Mentions "j'aime": 19,832
Quoting: swinny
See it too as a straight up deal.


Russell isn't useless but he's not great, Bonino is a great 3C
18 mai 2020 à 1 h 48
#8
Terry_AkiSauce
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 3,421
Mentions "j'aime": 1,045
Trouba moved specifically to NY for his wife, hes not getting traded
18 mai 2020 à 2 h 32
#9
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,721
Mentions "j'aime": 2,805
Quoting: Terry_AkiSauce
Trouba moved specifically to NY for his wife, hes not getting traded


GMs don't hold back from trading players because of there wives lol. It's a business...
18 mai 2020 à 2 h 40
#10
Terry_AkiSauce
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 3,421
Mentions "j'aime": 1,045
Quoting: Bf3351
GMs don't hold back from trading players because of there wives lol. It's a business...


Hes their #1 dman with a full NMC after this season and due to the delay and the date that the clause would kick in, they probably wouldn't have time to trade him. Also why would they trade such a big part of their team this year after nearly making playoffs (they probably would've had the season not been delayed)
18 mai 2020 à 3 h 10
#11
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,721
Mentions "j'aime": 2,805
Quoting: Terry_AkiSauce
Hes their #1 dman with a full NMC after this season and due to the delay and the date that the clause would kick in, they probably wouldn't have time to trade him. Also why would they trade such a big part of their team this year after nearly making playoffs (they probably would've had the season not been delayed)


He's not there number 1 dman and he had a bad first season. Have you been living under a rock?
18 mai 2020 à 3 h 37
#12
Terry_AkiSauce
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 3,421
Mentions "j'aime": 1,045
Quoting: Bf3351
He's not there number 1 dman and he had a bad first season. Have you been living under a rock?


Led the team in ice time and had 55% DZS. No other defenseman on the rangers could do that, you been living under a rock bud?
18 mai 2020 à 3 h 40
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 4,812
Mentions "j'aime": 2,012
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Russell isn't useless but he's not great, Bonino is a great 3C


Why this is a straight up deal is the Preds have too much up front, and the Oilers have too much on the backend. Contracts and term are the same too.

Russell is more effective than a lot of people think. He does his work quietly. Not saying he is a top 2 defenseman, but I say he can play top 4. No different than Bonino can play 2C, but is best suited at 3C.

The value for the Preds here is Russell provides a real opportunity to isolate Fabbro against competition that will better foster is overall development. This was lacking this year. Big time.

That nugget of thought is why I see a straight up deal.
18 mai 2020 à 3 h 46
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 4,812
Mentions "j'aime": 2,012
Quoting: Terry_AkiSauce
Led the team in ice time and had 55% DZS. No other defenseman on the rangers could do that, you been living under a rock bud?


Yes!!! Some D take a full year to get used to a new system. Further I would suggest Fox and DeAngelo were playing some isolated minutes. Trouba did some heavy lifting, so I wouldn't call his season "bad" - underwhelming yes.

But with DeAngelo and Fox's continued development I wonder if the #1 tag is something he looses....🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔 I mean even managing minutes, Fox did look awefully good.
18 mai 2020 à 6 h 3
#15
Terry_AkiSauce
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 3,421
Mentions "j'aime": 1,045
Quoting: swinny
Yes!!! Some D take a full year to get used to a new system. Further I would suggest Fox and DeAngelo were playing some isolated minutes. Trouba did some heavy lifting, so I wouldn't call his season "bad" - underwhelming yes.

But with DeAngelo and Fox's continued development I wonder if the #1 tag is something he looses....🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔 I mean even managing minutes, Fox did look awefully good.


Fox is definitely the future and may even be the best dman in NY as soon as this season but Trouba was logging those minutes without even playing much PP. Pretty much on the ice for the full PK everytime and shutting down top lines
18 mai 2020 à 10 h 6
#16
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 33,053
Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
So acquiring Trouba means you'd need to protect Josi and Trouba because of their NMCs and probably Ellis. Which means you'd lose one of Ekholm or Fabbro. So not a smart move.
18 mai 2020 à 10 h 6
#17
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 33,053
Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
So acquiring Trouba means you'd need to protect Josi and Trouba because of their NMCs and probably Ellis. Which means you'd lose one of Ekholm or Fabbro. So not a smart move.
18 mai 2020 à 11 h 19
#18
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,721
Mentions "j'aime": 2,805
Quoting: DiehardRedWingsFan58
So acquiring Trouba means you'd need to protect Josi and Trouba because of their NMCs and probably Ellis. Which means you'd lose one of Ekholm or Fabbro. So not a smart move.


There's a thing that exists where you can send a pick or prospect to an expansion team in order for them not to pick a certain player.

Or they can protect 8 skaters because they only have 4 forwards to protect anyway. Tolvanen and Tomasino will be exempt. They can use the other 4 to protect there top 4 as well as sending a pick or prospect to protect the 5th defenseman.
18 mai 2020 à 12 h 31
#19
Go Preds
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 684
Mentions "j'aime": 229
If Tolvanen and Tomasino aren't NHL ready, this is a huge bust. Trouba doesn't make sense to add to this team either. The problems are 3rd pair D and middle 6 scoring. You can spend the $8M other ways to fix both, regardless of expansion drafts.
ZiggyPalffy a aimé ceci.
18 mai 2020 à 13 h 28
#20
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,721
Mentions "j'aime": 2,805
Quoting: ZPirtle
If Tolvanen and Tomasino aren't NHL ready, this is a huge bust. Trouba doesn't make sense to add to this team either. The problems are 3rd pair D and middle 6 scoring. You can spend the $8M other ways to fix both, regardless of expansion drafts.


Take notes @DiehardRedWingsFan58, that's fair and educated criticism.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage