SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Leafs

Créé par: Muzzin9
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 21 avr. 2020
Publié: 21 avr. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1880 000 $
11 300 000 $
2800 000 $
2750 000 $
1750 000 $
1950 000 $
1750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1700 000 $
21 750 000 $
44 400 000 $
1700 000 $
Transactions
TOR
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (WPG)
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2020 (STL)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
OTT
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TOR
Logo de WPG
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de VGK
Logo de TOR
Logo de CAR
Logo de COL
Logo de STL
Logo de SJS
Logo de STL
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de SJS
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $81 154 783 $0 $0 $345 217 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
880 000 $880 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
21 avr. 2020 à 13 h 49
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 17,140
Mentions "j'aime": 12,169
Sens don't need either Kerfoot or Johnsson. I don't hate Engvall though
21 avr. 2020 à 13 h 50
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,866
Mentions "j'aime": 7,417
now that's some awful value you got back in the trade there.
21 avr. 2020 à 13 h 53
#3
Hakuna Matata
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 34,611
Mentions "j'aime": 21,149
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
now that's some awful value you got back in the trade there.


I agree if kerfoot gets traded toronto would want a cheaper 3c in return, johnsson can go for a 2nd and engvall for a 4th or 5th pick. As for Dermott he probably is gone for a depth RD.
21 avr. 2020 à 13 h 57
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,866
Mentions "j'aime": 7,417
Quoting: aadoyle
I agree if kerfoot gets traded toronto would want a cheaper 3c in return, johnsson can go for a 2nd and engvall for a 4th or 5th pick. As for Dermott he probably is gone for a depth RD.


literally zero reason to move engvall so you can have a significantly worse player in his spot and are using way more cap space to carry an extra forward and 2 extra D. Engvall is very good defensivly and a great PK guy.
21 avr. 2020 à 14 h 9
#5
Hakuna Matata
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 34,611
Mentions "j'aime": 21,149
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
literally zero reason to move engvall so you can have a significantly worse player in his spot and are using way more cap space to carry an extra forward and 2 extra D. Engvall is very good defensivly and a great PK guy.


With barbanov coming and the return of Mikeyv I could see him potentially going. If johnsson, kerfoot, Engvall would be on the 4th line. Thats not necessarily a bad thing but at the same time at 1.25 mill for a 4th liner Dubas would probably rather move him and bring up a cheaper option like aberg. A lot of teams would love to have engvall and sure losing him could hurt the team but with all the depth the leafs have rn on the wing he may fall out of favor.
21 avr. 2020 à 14 h 39
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,866
Mentions "j'aime": 7,417
Quoting: aadoyle
With barbanov coming and the return of Mikeyv I could see him potentially going. If johnsson, kerfoot, Engvall would be on the 4th line. Thats not necessarily a bad thing but at the same time at 1.25 mill for a 4th liner Dubas would probably rather move him and bring up a cheaper option like aberg. A lot of teams would love to have engvall and sure losing him could hurt the team but with all the depth the leafs have rn on the wing he may fall out of favor.


i mean, in the scenario of moving Johnsson for picks having Engvall be a slightly over paid 4th liner is the absolute best case scenario for the leafs. Barbanov might not even be an NHLer let alone a good 3rd liner and who knows how good Mikheyev will be after his injury or if he was ever the player he showed he was in 25ish of the 39 games he played. If anything, Barbanov being so cheap makes it a good balance and reason to keep both
21 avr. 2020 à 14 h 55
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 123
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
Sens don't need either Kerfoot or Johnsson. I don't hate Engvall though


The send only have 11 players signed for next year and 2 are goalies. Granted alot are RFAs but you still need to fill out a roster and get to the floor.
21 avr. 2020 à 14 h 58
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 123
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Quoting: aadoyle
I agree if kerfoot gets traded toronto would want a cheaper 3c in return, johnsson can go for a 2nd and engvall for a 4th or 5th pick. As for Dermott he probably is gone for a depth RD.


Johnnson did go for a 2nd in the trade and kerfoot got the 3rd. Engvall was a 6th.
Anyone who thinks johnnson gets a 2nd alone is nuts. Hes a C+ 2nd line winger and probably a B+ 3rd liner.
21 avr. 2020 à 15 h 3
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 17,140
Mentions "j'aime": 12,169
Quoting: Muzzin9
The send only have 11 players signed for next year and 2 are goalies. Granted alot are RFAs but you still need to fill out a roster and get to the floor.


They have more than enough forwards. There will be a good amount of graduation next season, combined with several RFAs who need to be signed. They will need to make a signing or two for Defense, but that will likely be dealt with by signing Borowiecki and Zub, and possibly another RD Vet.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage