SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

1yr Back Up Deal amp UFAs

Créé par: juuice
Équipe: 2020-21 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 16 avr. 2020
Publié: 16 avr. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
- Overpay for Crawford to come home to Montreal for a season
-- He SHOULD be capable of alleviating pressure on Price. Hopefully he likes the idea.
-- Plus I think fans wouldn't mind seeing a hometown goalie in net on a Sat night at the Bell Centre.

- Throw some draft picks at teams to take some guys off the books

- 3 lines that are all capable of scoring
- Responsible and Versatile 4th line

- Solid TOP 4 D
- Young 5 & 6, with Kulak in there to support

- KK, Peohling, Romanov, Juulsen, Brook, all stay in the AHL until they're ready
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
66 000 000 $
21 000 000 $
32 000 000 $
22 000 000 $
21 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
53 500 000 $
14 000 000 $
55 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
MTL
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (ANA)
ANA
  1. Lehkonen, Artturi
Détails additionnels:
basically getting Lehkonen off the books....
2.
MTL
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2022 (WPG)
Détails additionnels:
or another team that can Buyout.....
WPG
  1. Alzner, Karl
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (ANA)
Détails additionnels:
get him off the books....
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de CHI
Logo de STL
Logo de MTL
Logo de WSH
Logo de MTL
Logo de ANA
Logo de WPG
Logo de MTL
Logo de FLA
Logo de MTL
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
2021
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
Logo de VGK
Logo de MTL
Logo de OTT
Logo de PHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de WPG
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2684 000 000 $81 270 475 $0 $3 927 500 $2 729 525 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 800 000 $4 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 083 333 $3 083 333 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
C
UFA - 2
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
C, AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 857 143 $7 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 6
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
771 666 $771 666 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
DD
RFA - 1
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
795 000 $795 000 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DD
UFA - 2

Unités spéciales

Avantage numérique 1
 
Avantage numérique 2
Infériorité numérique 1
Infériorité numérique 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
16 avr. 2020 à 11 h 13
#1
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 41,366
Mentions "j'aime": 26,096
I don't disagree with your desire to get Lehkonen off the books, but (1) he isn't going to bring back a second, especially one that is going to be 36th overall, and (2) Anaheim doesn't need him.
16 avr. 2020 à 11 h 19
#2
Evans truther
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,514
Mentions "j'aime": 1,434
You're giving assets to get rid of Alzner's contract (I guess because you're 55k under the cap), but you've got 3 players that needs to be sent down to be compliant to the 23 man roster plus Juulsen has done literally nothing to command a 2M$ salary.
I don't mind the signings (Even if you're on the rich side on some) but Romanov's not coming here to be a 7th dman so Mete and Kulak becomes your two healthy scratch on defense and for the sake of dev you send KK/Poehling to Laval and bring up anyone else. That clears out 3.72M$ which is enough to keep Alzner (3.55M$ burried) and my early 2nd rounder (Which is not enough for someone to take that contract btw).

"He SHOULD be capable of alleviating pressure on Price."
-At 4M$ a year he better be a freaking decent backup.

Quoting: OldNYIfan
I don't disagree with your desire to get Lehkonen off the books, but (1) he isn't going to bring back a second, especially one that is going to be 36th overall, and (2) Anaheim doesn't need him.

Not stated but pretty sure Anaheim's a placeholder as they're the first one in the trade block.
El_Yogi a aimé ceci.
16 avr. 2020 à 11 h 31
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 419
Mentions "j'aime": 137
Quoting: ColonelX
You're giving assets to get rid of Alzner's contract (I guess because you're 55k under the cap), but you've got 3 players that needs to be sent down to be compliant to the 23 man roster plus Juulsen has done literally nothing to command a 2M$ salary.
I don't mind the signings (Even if you're on the rich side on some) but Romanov's not coming here to be a 7th dman so Mete and Kulak becomes your two healthy scratch on defense and for the sake of dev you send KK/Poehling to Laval and bring up anyone else. That clears out 3.72M$ which is enough to keep Alzner (3.55M$ burried) and my early 2nd rounder (Which is not enough for someone to take that contract btw).

"He SHOULD be capable of alleviating pressure on Price."
-At 4M$ a year he better be a freaking decent backup.


Not stated but pretty sure Anaheim's a placeholder as they're the first one in the trade block.


I agree 100%.
No need to waste a precious high 2nd round pick in a deep draft.
I also think you shoudn't give such a big contract to Gustafsson.
Let Romanov play with Petry, and play as much as possible.
The guy will be a perfect 2nd pair D, maybe not next year, but he'll need to play enough to become one.
ColonelX a aimé ceci.
16 avr. 2020 à 11 h 44
#4
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 13,144
Mentions "j'aime": 10,516
Wow, this is horrible. That Gustafsson contract is disgusting, Domi & Toffoli are overpaid, and you’re giving $2 million to a player that has played a total of 37 games in the last 2 seasons. And giving up Lehkonen to move Alzner is horrible asset management, since Alzner’s buyout cap hit isn’t bad whatsoever.
16 avr. 2020 à 11 h 52
#5
Evans truther
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,514
Mentions "j'aime": 1,434
Quoting: El_Yogi
I also think you shoudn't give such a big contract to Gustafsson.

Also agree, he's been a one year wonder but came down to earth pretty quickly and traded for a 3rd rounder, I don't think that brings him a long term 3M$+ contract.
16 avr. 2020 à 13 h 31
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 39,470
Mentions "j'aime": 20,293
Quoting: Kotkaniemi15
Wow, this is horrible. That Gustafsson contract is disgusting, Domi & Toffoli are overpaid, and you’re giving $2 million to a player that has played a total of 37 games in the last 2 seasons. And giving up Lehkonen to move Alzner is horrible asset management, since Alzner’s buyout cap hit isn’t bad whatsoever.


Pump the breaks a bit here, the Gus contract is in the right price range just maybe a year or 2 too long. Too much for Toffoli? Really? You will be lucky to get him for less than 6M. Domi contract seems accurate, maybe only 3 years though. The rest I agree with.
16 avr. 2020 à 13 h 45
#7
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 13,144
Mentions "j'aime": 10,516
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Pump the breaks a bit here, the Gus contract is in the right price range just maybe a year or 2 too long. Too much for Toffoli? Really? You will be lucky to get him for less than 6M. Domi contract seems accurate, maybe only 3 years though. The rest I agree with.


Gustafsson isn’t good and we don’t need him. Domi wouldn’t get 6 million even if the salary cap wasn’t screwed up by the virus. At this point, through his 2 years as a hab, Domi’s been very inconsistent, which is definitely not worthy of a long term contract. At this point he’s only been useful at C, and that’s the last thing the habs need right now. So it makes no sense to commit to him for a long time right now. I’d say something like a one year contract at about $4 million. As for Toffoli, yeah he’d probably get that in free agency in a normal year, but the habs can’t afford to overpay anyone, and this year is definitely not a normal year.
17 avr. 2020 à 9 h 5
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 47
Mentions "j'aime": 11
Quoting: OldNYIfan
I don't disagree with your desire to get Lehkonen off the books, but (1) he isn't going to bring back a second, especially one that is going to be 36th overall, and (2) Anaheim doesn't need him.



I see your point...honestly, I just put Anaheim cause they are the first team on the list. I like Lehkonen, but the Habs have too many 3rd liners. I would move him for very little at this point, just to open up space.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
17 avr. 2020 à 9 h 36
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 47
Mentions "j'aime": 11
Ya, Forget about that Juulsen deal, not sure why I went to $2m there...put him on the league minimum if he's healthy and training camp goes well. Maybe I was thinking that if he was healthy this time, he would have earned that and been a decent 5/6 by now, with hopes of becoming a top 4...

Alzner and Lehkonen, just trying to get them off the books. I'd like to save that buyout money if possible....but you're right, the buyout could be managed. I like Lehkonen, but the Habs have too many 3rd liners...Its basically between Lehkonen and Byron for me. I'll take Byron (healthy) even though he's older. And in a year or two, he'll either sign for $1m or move out.

Toffoli is just about a perennial 20 goal scorer with some size. Only one full season he didn't score 20. Its gonna cost a bit to get him or someone like him. I like Rakell out of anaheim, but I'm not sure they'll let him go.

Domi...overpriced.....again, I think its gonna be hard to nail him down for less. I'd like to see him at the $5.5, or do a bridge deal, but not sure that'll go. Although...if someone Offer Sheets him for $6m (or more) we'll get at least a 1st Rd draft pick back.....so maybe thats some leverage....

Agreed that ROMANOV shouldn't be a 5-6-7 D. I'd only bring him up to the big club if he's ready for a top 4 role. Maybe with a little time as the 5th. I just don't think he will be ready next year.

Gustafosson....I like him, not my 1st Choice....but I think it's gonna be hard to get a top 4 LHD as a UFA, and i doubt any of the Habs prospects or Mete can be a proper Top4 LHD. Trade hopefully.....but not sure we'll be able to grab a Brodin. What other Top 4 LHD are reasonable for the Habs to go for??

As for contract durations....ya, I'm prolly a little there. I'd need to lay out the next 5-6years for the whole team and post that....
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage