Forums/Armchair-GM

Lets See What Weve Got

Créé par: OldNYIfan
Date de création initiale: fév 24, 2020
Publié: Feb 24 at 5:40 pm
Équipe: 2019-20 Ducks d'Anaheim
Explications
Boy, that's a lot of cap space to carry over into next year. Too bad Alex Pietrangelo has absolutely no interest whatsoever in signing here. Doesn't anyone know a nice, single actress to introduce him to?
Rachats de contrats
  • Corey Perry: 2 625 000 $
  • Simon Despres: 0 $
Enfoui
  • Christian Djoos: 175 000 $ (1 250 000 $)
ANNÉE DE REPÊCHAGERONDE 1RONDE 2RONDE 3RONDE 4RONDE 5RONDE 6RONDE 7
2020
ANA
BOS
ANA
ANA
ANA
ANA
2021
ANA
ANA
ANA
ANA
ANA
ANA
2022
ANA
ANA
ANA
ANA
ANA
ANA
NSH
ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS BONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $71 495 790 $0 $2 182 500 $10 004 210 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
ANA
Rakell, Rickard
3 789 444 $
C, AD, AG
UFA - 3
ANA
Getzlaf, Ryan
8 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
ANA
Silfverberg, Jakob
5 250 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 5
ANA
Heinen, Danton
2 800 000 $
C, AG, AD
RFA - 2
ANA
Henrique, Adam
5 825 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 5
ANA
Terry, Troy
925 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 1
ANA
Jones, Max
863 333 $
AG
RFA - 2
ANA
Steel, Sam
863 333 $
C
RFA - 2
ANA
Sherwood, Kiefer
925 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
ANA
Milano, Sonny
874 125 $
AG
RFA - 1
ANA
Carrick, Sam
700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
ANA
Rowney, Carter
1 133 333 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
ANA
Deslauriers, Nicolas
950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
ANA
Lindholm, Hampus
5 205 556 $
DG
UFA - 3
ANA
Manson, Josh
4 100 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 3
ANA
Gibson, John
6 400 000 $
G
UFA - 8
ANA
Larsson, Jacob
894 166 $
DG
RFA - 1
ANA
Miller, Ryan
1 125 000 $
G
NTC
UFA - 1
ANA
Del Zotto, Michael
750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
ANA
Guhle, Brendan
697 500 $
DG
RFA - 1
ANA
Irwin, Matt
675 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
ANA
Agozzino, Andrew
700 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
ANA
Fowler, Cam
6 500 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 7
ANA
Kesler, Ryan
6 875 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
ANA
Backes, David
4 500 000 $
C, AD
NTC
UFA - 2
ANA
Gudbranson, Erik
4 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
ANA
Eaves, Patrick
3 150 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
24 fév à 17 h 47
#1
Jah1722
Rejoint: jan 2018
Messages: 1,618
Mentions "j'aime": 625
Minus the $4M bump from the PERRY buyout.
OldNYIfan et Salzy a aimé ceci.
24 fév à 18 h 11
#2
Rejoint: nov 2018
Messages: 831
Mentions "j'aime": 594
I like the moves made

Getting a potential top 6er in Heinen who at his lowest season is more productive point-wise than Ritchie, I'll make that 1 for 1 every chance I get

Taking a Flier on Milano, who like the Heinen deal, worst case posts similar production to Shore, but has upside

Irwin deal is pretty much a wash but we get a 6th so I guess we came out on top there

Sprong seemed doomed to stay in SD, not the biggest fan of Djoos, would have rather seen a right shot Dman come back but oh well

We add Joel Persson for a 7th, and A.Redmond nice to add a depth RD with how much we need one at a small cost

A 4th for Grant is what I've been saying the return will be for weeks, no surprise there but at least we get the pick we gave for Deslauriers back

Gonna lump the Kase deal in here too, Kase for whatever reason wasn't really working here, Getting a first and a solid B prospect in Andersson is nice, Backes is of little consequence to us

Needs haven't changed from a week ago but we've added some nice pieces at some areas of weakness that could turn into steals for us, I'd give the Ducks deadline week or so a solid B, sure we could have seen a better return for Kase but I'm personally a fan of that deal for us still, Heinen and Milano could turn out great but worst case they are a wash for what we gave up, added a 1st, 4th and 6th, so while not spectacular it was a good week of business I feel
OldNYIfan et AGKH123 a aimé ceci.
24 fév à 18 h 15
#3
Démarrer sujet
First NY Then LA
Rejoint: jun 2018
Messages: 9,473
Mentions "j'aime": 4,088
Quoting: Salzy
I like the moves made

Getting a potential top 6er in Heinen who at his lowest season is more productive point-wise than Ritchie, I'll make that 1 for 1 every chance I get

Taking a Flier on Milano, who like the Heinen deal, worst case posts similar production to Shore, but has upside

Irwin deal is pretty much a wash but we get a 6th so I guess we came out on top there

Sprong seemed doomed to stay in SD, not the biggest fan of Djoos, would have rather seen a right shot Dman come back but oh well

We add Joel Persson for a 7th, and A.Redmond nice to add a depth RD with how much we need one at a small cost

A 4th for Grant is what I've been saying the return will be for weeks, no surprise there but at least we get the pick we gave for Deslauriers back

Gonna lump the Kase deal in here too, Kase for whatever reason wasn't really working here, Getting a first and a solid B prospect in Andersson is nice, Backes is of little consequence to us

Needs haven't changed from a week ago but we've added some nice pieces at some areas of weakness that could turn into steals for us, I'd give the Ducks deadline week or so a solid B, sure we could have seen a better return for Kase but I'm personally a fan of that deal for us still, Heinen and Milano could turn out great but worst case they are a wash for what we gave up, added a 1st, 4th and 6th, so while not spectacular it was a good week of business I feel


I, too, give it a B because I wouldn't have made the Grant trade but, as you say, at least we got the Des Lauriers pick back. Of course I really love the Kase trade and only wish we could have made a Larsson-for-Weegar deal. But maybe that just wasn't on the table.
Salzy a aimé ceci.
24 fév à 18 h 20
#4
Rejoint: nov 2018
Messages: 831
Mentions "j'aime": 594
Quoting: OldNYIfan
I, too, give it a B because I wouldn't have made the Grant trade but, as you say, at least we got the Des Lauriers pick back. Of course I really love the Kase trade and only wish we could have made a Larsson-for-Weegar deal. But maybe that just wasn't on the table.


I was pretty strongly on the side of move Grant for whatever gets offered, even a 4th for a bottom 6 guy on a team competing for the draft lottery is a win in my eyes

I'm hopeful GMBM makes a deal for a second pair RD around the draft and depending how the lottery plays out we get one of Lafreniere, Byfield, Stutzle, Lundell, Raymond, Holtz, Perfetti, Drysdale or Rossi
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
24 fév à 18 h 29
#5
Rejoint: nov 2018
Messages: 831
Mentions "j'aime": 594
@OldNYIfan @Jah1722 @mytduxfan Curious to see who you guys think we should go after if we target a top 4 RD by trade/FA
24 fév à 18 h 30
#6
Démarrer sujet
First NY Then LA
Rejoint: jun 2018
Messages: 9,473
Mentions "j'aime": 4,088
Quoting: Salzy
I was pretty strongly on the side of move Grant for whatever gets offered, even a 4th for a bottom 6 guy on a team competing for the draft lottery is a win in my eyes

I'm hopeful GMBM makes a deal for a second pair RD around the draft and depending how the lottery plays out we get one of Lafreniere, Byfield, Stutzle, Lundell, Raymond, Holtz, Perfetti, Drysdale or Rossi


Okay, since you and I have virtually nothing to look forward to until the draft lotteries in the spring, here's my handicapping of the draft pool:

1. LaFreniere
2. Byfield
3. Raymond
4. Drysdale
5. Holtz
6. Perfetti

These are Anaheim's choices in order, of course. Other teams won't have such an elevated need for a defenseman.

What I'm worried about is Ottawa having one pick ahead of ours. Is their strategy to get two of the really highly-rated forwards? Or one star forward and the best defenseman in the class? If the latter, then Ottawa can assure themselves of achieving that aim by picking Drysdale at #3 or #4 and not waiting until their second pick to take him.
Salzy a aimé ceci.
24 fév à 18 h 35
#7
Rejoint: nov 2018
Messages: 831
Mentions "j'aime": 594
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Okay, since you and I have virtually nothing to look forward to until the draft lotteries in the spring, here's my handicapping of the draft pool:

1. LaFreniere
2. Byfield
3. Raymond
4. Drysdale
5. Holtz
6. Perfetti

These are Anaheim's choices in order, of course. Other teams won't have such an elevated need for a defenseman.

What I'm worried about is Ottawa having one pick ahead of ours. Is their strategy to get two of the really highly-rated forwards? Or one star forward and the best defenseman in the class? If the latter, then Ottawa can assure themselves of achieving that aim by picking Drysdale at #3 or #4 and not waiting until their second pick to take him.


After Laf my ranking is way different than yours ahah

1. Laf
2. Stutzle
3. Byfield
4. Drysdale
5. Raymond
6. Perfetti
7. Lundell
8. Holtz
9. Rossi

Say the pick order doesnt change from now
Det - Laf
LA - Byfield
OTT
ANA
OTT (SJS)

I 100% think Drysdale goes 3 in that scenario if OTT wants him, They know we need RD help and he likely wont be there at 5, I'd be fine with that if we get Stutzle at 4
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
24 fév à 18 h 39
#8
Démarrer sujet
First NY Then LA
Rejoint: jun 2018
Messages: 9,473
Mentions "j'aime": 4,088
Modifié 24 fév à 18 h 51. Raison: corrected mis-spelling
Quoting: Salzy
@OldNYIfan @Jah1722 @mytduxfan Curious to see who you guys think we should go after if we target a top 4 RD by trade/FA


The only UFA who appeals to me is Radko Gudas, as a kind of Kevin Bieksa kind of guy. I think that the Dylan DeMelo clipper has sailed, as did the Jared Spurgeon frigate.

The trade market (given our assets) is probably limited to upcomers like Scott Mayfield and Mackenzie Weegar. Most of the guys I really covet (Pesce, Carlo, Pulock, Marino, Fox, etc.) are almost certainly not available. Troy Stecher is only a stopgap solution. Erik Cernak in Tampa is probably only reachable via offer sheet, and why would he come here if the Lightning really make an effort to keep him?
Salzy a aimé ceci.
24 fév à 18 h 42
#9
Démarrer sujet
First NY Then LA
Rejoint: jun 2018
Messages: 9,473
Mentions "j'aime": 4,088
Quoting: Salzy
After Laf my ranking is way different than yours ahah

1. Laf
2. Stutzle
3. Byfield
4. Drysdale
5. Raymond
6. Perfetti
7. Lundell
8. Holtz
9. Rossi

Say the pick order doesnt change from now
Det - Laf
LA - Byfield
OTT
ANA
OTT (SJS)

I 100% think Drysdale goes 3 in that scenario if OTT wants him, They know we need RD help and he likely wont be there at 5, I'd be fine with that if we get Stutzle at 4


I'm jotting these down on a sheet with three columns: after the mid-terms, after the final rankings, and the night before the draft. Anybody else care to get in on this? I'll be the group secretary.
Salzy a aimé ceci.
24 fév à 19 h 28
#10
Jah1722
Rejoint: jan 2018
Messages: 1,618
Mentions "j'aime": 625
Quoting: Salzy
@OldNYIfan @Jah1722 @mytduxfan Curious to see who you guys think we should go after if we target a top 4 RD by trade/FA


I don’t think they go after a top 4 RD this offseason. I think they think they’re fine with Manson and Gudbranson going into next season. Unless they get blown away by a deal for Manson they have 5 of their 6 D spots set for next season. Lindholm, Manson, Fowler, Gudbranson, and Guhle/Larsson/Mahura.

Idk enough about the draft prospects right now but I think if they get in the lottery and pick top 3, they should consider using a Jones or Comtois package for young potential top 4 dman that’s already gotten NHL minutes. Or a young scorer. I’m not sure who tho. Cernak for Jones has been something I liked the idea of.
Salzy et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
25 fév à 4 h 48
#11
Rejoint: jan 2017
Messages: 1,258
Mentions "j'aime": 360
Overall, I'm happy with how the TDL went. The only move I don't like is the Ritchie trade, but that's only because Heinen is just so vanilla. Not a bad player, but doesn't really excel at anything. Reminds me of Logan Shaw. Would have preferred a pick to be honest. Some are saying the Kase deal was bad and BM should have got more. I'm going to assume that was the best deal on the table. It's not what I hoped for, but, if it's a question of taking the deal or not, I'd take the deal because Kase's value was only going 1-way. The rest are good deals. Getting anything for Grant, Holzer, Shore is a win in my book. Losing Sprong sucks and as that Pettersson trade continues to look terrible for us. I don't understand why he was never given an opportunity here. At least we have Sprong 2.0 in Milano, who I believe is a better team player whilst also suffering the same defensive deficiencies as Sprong.

Quoting: Salzy
@OldNYIfan @Jah1722 @mytduxfan Curious to see who you guys think we should go after if we target a top 4 RD by trade/FA


I wouldn't. We need to get younger in that position. Unless we're trading Rakell to EDM for Bouchard or to NYR for Nils Lundkvist, I just stand pat with what we have. The draft is the best way to improve RD. Lots of RH D-men will be available around our 2nd 1st round pick.
OldNYIfan et Salzy a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Supprimer une option
Soumettre le sondage