SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

If you want anymore ducks players this is what its gonna take

Créé par: BuckoJoyde
Équipe: 2019-20 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 21 févr. 2020
Publié: 21 févr. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Not saying this reasonable but what BM is gonna want. Ps Henrique and Silfverberg aren't gonna be traded. Unless a team is stupid. Not saying they are bad. In fact I rather keep them. But, they will not help with a playoff push and the term is kinda not looking good. No line up for this gm!!! We realistically won't have 4 1st round draft picks so don't @ me with that ISH. These are just the tough terms for these desperate teams. what y'all thinking?
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. Bouchard, Evan
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (EDM)
Détails additionnels:
Conditional depending on playoffs. Like if they don't make it will become 2021 1st.
2.
ANA
  1. Byfuglien, Dustin
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (WPG)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (WPG)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (WPG)
Détails additionnels:
Byfuglien 35% retention. WPG lacks prospects we need and any good prospects at that.
3.
ANA
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (NYI)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (NYI)
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de EDM
Logo de WPG
Logo de ANA
Logo de NYI
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2021
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de WPG
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de NYI
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de WPG
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $71 119 785 $0 $2 182 500 $10 380 215 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 541 000 $1 541 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 498 925 $1 498 925 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 133 333 $1 133 333 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
UFA - 8
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 200 000 $$1M)
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
894 166 $894 166 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
697 500 $697 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
894 167 $894 167 $
DD
RFA - 4
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
7 600 000 $7 600 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
22 févr. 2020 à 0 h 0
#1
GM - Canucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 5,192
Mentions "j'aime": 1,218
Manson deal will not happen as more likely he is headed to Toronto as perfect 1rst pairing partner with Morgan Rielly and Leafs have the assets to make it happen.
22 févr. 2020 à 0 h 3
#2
Démarrer sujet
Being wrong is ok
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 703
Mentions "j'aime": 354
what would that trade be? I was actually a little unsure especially since their firsts in 20 and 21 are kinda locked up based on conditions.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
22 févr. 2020 à 0 h 7
#3
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,345
Mentions "j'aime": 25,264
Quoting: TMLSage
Manson deal will not happen as more likely he is headed to Toronto as perfect 1rst pairing partner with Morgan Rielly and Leafs have the assets to make it happen.


Quoting: Slezzy21
what would that trade be? I was actually a little unsure especially since their firsts in 20 and 21 are kinda locked up based on conditions.


Yeah, and every time a Toronto guy posts a Manson for Ceci, Bracco and a 2021 second trade and we say No, it's gonna cost Liljegren plus, you guys squeal and have to change into dry pants. Exactly what assets that you are willing to part with are you talking about?
Lenny7, TMLSage et Dan10900 a aimé ceci.
22 févr. 2020 à 0 h 10
#4
Démarrer sujet
Being wrong is ok
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 703
Mentions "j'aime": 354
@OldNYIfan do you want Liljegren? Im not that big on him and honestly I fought myself from putting two first from wpg especially with bufs contract. That being Manson is probably not going anywhere which is ayeokay with me.
Lenny7 a aimé ceci.
22 févr. 2020 à 0 h 10
#5
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Yeah, and every time a Toronto guy posts a Manson for Ceci, Bracco and a 2021 second trade and we say No, it's gonna cost Liljegren plus, you guys squeal and have to change into dry pants. Exactly what assets that you are willing to part with are you talking about?


JOHNSSON BRACCO AND SOMETHING ELSE THAT DOESNT FIT THE DUCKS NEEDS! BuT eVeRyOnE uNdErVaLuEs LeAvEs PlAyErZzZzZ
BuckoJoyde, Dan10900 et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
22 févr. 2020 à 0 h 11
#6
GM - Canucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 5,192
Mentions "j'aime": 1,218
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Yeah, and every time a Toronto guy posts a Manson for Ceci, Bracco and a 2021 second trade and we say No, it's gonna cost Liljegren plus, you guys squeal and have to change into dry pants. Exactly what assets that you are willing to part with are you talking about?


I am thinking as a starting point for a possible trade in say Johnsson, Dermott, prospect and later round draft pick on the assumption that Manson also redoes a long-term contract with the Leafs. Manson is absolutely the perfect right hand defenceman that the Leafs need. The Ducks need to bottom out and start accumulating younger players and draft picks. Ducks owe it to Manson to move him to a good team and not waste his talent during a rebuild.
22 févr. 2020 à 0 h 12
#7
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: Slezzy21
@OldNYIfan do you want Liljegren? Im not that big on him and honestly I fought myself from putting two first from wpg especially with bufs contract. That being Manson is probably not going anywhere which is ayeokay with me.


Yeah, it’s gonna take an overpay to get any Ducks fan here to agree to love Manson. I’m quite happy to keep him honestly. Lots of cap room in the offseason to fill the holes, and Manson is a beauty.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
22 févr. 2020 à 0 h 13
#8
Démarrer sujet
Being wrong is ok
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 703
Mentions "j'aime": 354
@TMLSage only problem bud is were giving you a player with term not a rental. Oh yay tell Johnson and Dermott to kick rocks just my opinion. not bad players
Lenny7 a aimé ceci.
22 févr. 2020 à 0 h 15
#9
GM - Canucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 5,192
Mentions "j'aime": 1,218
Quoting: Slezzy21
@TMLSage only problem bud is were giving you a player with term not a rental. Oh yay tell Johnson and Dermott to kick rocks just my opinion. not bad players


That is true but I am giving you two really solid and younger players to rebuild your team around going forward.
22 févr. 2020 à 0 h 19
#10
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: TMLSage
I am thinking as a starting point for a possible trade in say Johnsson, Dermott, prospect and later round draft pick on the assumption that Manson also redoes a long-term contract with the Leafs. Manson is absolutely the perfect right hand defenceman that the Leafs need. The Ducks need to bottom out and start accumulating younger players and draft picks. Ducks owe it to Manson to move him to a good team and not waste his talent during a rebuild.


Yup, you’re right, Ducks are so old, most of them sat behind Jesus in second grade.

Steel, Terry, Guhle, Larsson, Mahura, Rakell, Jones, Olivier-Groulx, Gibby, Morand, Tracey, Lundestrom, Andersson and Comtois are all past their prime, and Zegras is a bust. Better give Manson to the Leafs for players that don’t fill their needs! Might as well throw in that high 1st round pick this year, because Murray has NEVER been able to draft well.
BuckoJoyde, TMLSage, Dan10900 and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
22 févr. 2020 à 0 h 19
#11
Démarrer sujet
Being wrong is ok
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 703
Mentions "j'aime": 354
@TMLSage your doing opposite tho. We don't need another LHD and Johnsson is in his mid 20's we just traded a better player in his mid 20's. We need 18 yo's and 1st/2nd picks.
TMLSage, Dan10900 et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
22 févr. 2020 à 0 h 19
#12
GM - Canucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 5,192
Mentions "j'aime": 1,218
Quoting: Lenny7
Yeah, it’s gonna take an overpay to get any Ducks fan here to agree to love Manson. I’m quite happy to keep him honestly. Lots of cap room in the offseason to fill the holes, and Manson is a beauty.


Manson and Getzlaf are being wasted in Anaheim. These are two really elite hockey players that need to be playing for a team that is actually going to compete in the Stanley Cup playoffs. Ducks need to get on with the rebuild and ship these 2 winners out for younger players and draft picks and get on with the rebuild which is going to take another 4 years.
22 févr. 2020 à 0 h 20
#13
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: TMLSage
That is true but I am giving you two really solid and younger players to rebuild your team around going forward.


I’ll give you Ritchie and Larsson for Morgan Rielly. Two young players to save you from CapDoom.
22 févr. 2020 à 0 h 21
#14
GM - Canucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 5,192
Mentions "j'aime": 1,218
Quoting: Slezzy21
@TMLSage your doing opposite tho. We don't need another LHD and Johnsson is in his mid 20's we just traded a better player in his mid 20's. We need 18 yo's and 1st/2nd picks.


I think Dermott can play on the right side and he might help you guys get McDavid down the road as he played with Connor on Erie Otters junior team.
22 févr. 2020 à 0 h 24
#15
GM - Canucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 5,192
Mentions "j'aime": 1,218
Quoting: Lenny7
Yup, you’re right, Ducks are so old, most of them sat behind Jesus in second grade.

Steel, Terry, Guhle, Larsson, Mahura, Rakell, Jones, Olivier-Groulx, Gibby, Morand, Tracey, Lundestrom, Andersson and Comtois are all past their prime, and Zegras is a bust. Better give Manson to the Leafs for players that don’t fill their needs! Might as well throw in that high 1st round pick this year, because Murray has NEVER been able to draft well.


I never said the Ducks were too old and only said Ducks should trade Getzlaff and Manson and load up with more younger players and draft picks to finish the rebuild. You might also be very interested in Adam Brooks as he and Sam Steel were dynamite together on the Regina Pats four years ago.
22 févr. 2020 à 0 h 25
#16
Démarrer sujet
Being wrong is ok
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 703
Mentions "j'aime": 354
@TMLSage I completely agree with the timeline and id say your being very nice about it. more like 6 years. Anyways, we'll see what Getz wants to do next year at the deadline and as a UFA. I get the impression he wants to stay. Manson on the other hand we got 3 years baby and we can wait a year for the right deal for whatever is value is atm. This year is probably not gonna happen.
Dan10900, TMLSage et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
22 févr. 2020 à 0 h 25
#17
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: TMLSage
I think Dermott can play on the right side and he might help you guys get McDavid down the road as he played with Connor on Erie Otters junior team.


That’s the Leafiest Leafs dream that I’ve ever heard. “Undersell on Manson, because Dermott might be able to convince McDavid to become a Duck”

Cmonnnnn.
Quoting: TMLSage
Manson and Getzlaf are being wasted in Anaheim. These are two really elite hockey players that need to be playing for a team that is actually going to compete in the Stanley Cup playoffs. Ducks need to get on with the rebuild and ship these 2 winners out for younger players and draft picks and get on with the rebuild which is going to take another 4 years.


Getzy is a career duck. Ducks need a solid RD, and a solid scoring option up front. They’ve got a ton of cap room in the offseason.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
22 févr. 2020 à 0 h 26
#18
GM - Canucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 5,192
Mentions "j'aime": 1,218
Quoting: Lenny7
I’ll give you Ritchie and Larsson for Morgan Rielly. Two young players to save you from CapDoom.


Rielly is in top 5 defenceman in entire NHL and is only 25 years old and was a captain candidate on the Leafs before Tavares was selected so your deal does not seem fair even though I really like Nick Ritchie.
22 févr. 2020 à 0 h 30
#19
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: TMLSage
I never said the Ducks were too old and only said Ducks should trade Getzlaff and Manson and load up with more younger players and draft picks to finish the rebuild. You might also be very interested in Adam Brooks as he and Sam Steel were dynamite together on the Regina Pats four years ago.


The WHL isn’t the NHL. Every single connection doesn’t mean that it works in the NHL.

As for the “old” comment, my apologies, I took “they need to sell off everything” as a “their time has passed because they’re old”. You just think they suck, and that’s fine. They’ve got one of the top 2 goalies in the NHL. They’ve got a d core that has Lindholm, Fowler and Manson. They’ve got a solid prospect pool. Add a top 4 RD, and a solid scoring threat up front, and all of the sudden this team surprises everyone.
TMLSage et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
22 févr. 2020 à 0 h 33
#20
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: TMLSage
Rielly is in top 5 defenceman in entire NHL and is only 25 years old and was a captain candidate on the Leafs before Tavares was selected so your deal does not seem fair even though I really like Nick Ritchie.


tears of joy I wasn’t being serious, I was trying to point out how foolish trading a very good player for “two really solid and good young guys (THAT DONT FILL THE TEAMS NEEDS) to build your team around”. Nobody is building a team around friggin Johnsson and Dermott, and if they are, they’re going to have a longer cup drought than the Leafs.

I mean, the good news for the Ducks is at least they’re not a playoff bubble team.
TMLSage et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
22 févr. 2020 à 0 h 41
#21
GM - Canucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 5,192
Mentions "j'aime": 1,218
Quoting: Lenny7
The WHL isn’t the NHL. Every single connection doesn’t mean that it works in the NHL.

As for the “old” comment, my apologies, I took “they need to sell off everything” as a “their time has passed because they’re old”. You just think they suck, and that’s fine. They’ve got one of the top 2 goalies in the NHL. They’ve got a d core that has Lindholm, Fowler and Manson. They’ve got a solid prospect pool. Add a top 4 RD, and a solid scoring threat up front, and all of the sudden this team surprises everyone.


Sounds like Ducks are in much better shape than the Sharks and Kings to return to a highly competitive team faster. There is a trade off to consider whether to hold on to proven veteran players to help mentor the team's younger players vs trade them off for younger players and draft picks in rebuilding a hockey team. Not saying what is best for the Ducks but sometimes the fastest way to rebuild is to tear down a team and then complete rebuild.
Dan10900 a aimé ceci.
22 févr. 2020 à 0 h 46
#22
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: TMLSage
Sounds like Ducks are in much better shape than the Sharks and Kings to return to a highly competitive team faster. There is a trade off to consider whether to hold on to proven veteran players to help mentor the team's younger players vs trade them off for younger players and draft picks in rebuilding a hockey team. Not saying what is best for the Ducks but sometimes the fastest way to rebuild is to tear down a team and then complete rebuild.


Yeah, I think the big thing here is this-Kesler is really the only bad contract, and it’s on LTIR. He’s done.

After that, they aren’t in cap trouble (unlike SJ and LA).

I’d be fine to trade off someone like Silfverberg, but I don’t see how moving a guy like Manson without being overpaid for him helps anything. And if you’re trading off vets like Manson, Getzy, etc, you’ve pulled a Montreal-type move and wasted the prime years of your franchise goalie.
TMLSage et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
22 févr. 2020 à 0 h 55
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
Quoting: TMLSage
Manson and Getzlaf are being wasted in Anaheim. These are two really elite hockey players that need to be playing for a team that is actually going to compete in the Stanley Cup playoffs. Ducks need to get on with the rebuild and ship these 2 winners out for younger players and draft picks and get on with the rebuild which is going to take another 4 years.


Getz isn't going anywhere most likely, by his choice, fill NTC and has publicly stated he doesn't want to chase a cup to end his career
Lenny7, TMLSage et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
22 févr. 2020 à 0 h 59
#24
GM - Canucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 5,192
Mentions "j'aime": 1,218
Quoting: Lenny7
Yeah, I think the big thing here is this-Kesler is really the only bad contract, and it’s on LTIR. He’s done.

After that, they aren’t in cap trouble (unlike SJ and LA).

I’d be fine to trade off someone like Silfverberg, but I don’t see how moving a guy like Manson without being overpaid for him helps anything. And if you’re trading off vets like Manson, Getzy, etc, you’ve pulled a Montreal-type move and wasted the prime years of your franchise goalie.


All good points. I can tell you that I am a Leaf fan and I am hearing that Leafs are still kicking tires on Manson and Severson and would not be surprised if Leafs step up and actually over pay for Manson, which as you have said at that point, the Ducks would have to seriously consider pulling the trigger and trading him to the Leafs.

I like the way the Canucks have rebuilt their team through the draft after bottoming out for around 5 years but have drafted Vertanen, Boeser, Petterson, Hughes etc....and are now becomming a really good team. Sometimes the fastest way back to a really competitive team is to tear down your team for a few years and rebuild instead of trying to always be competitive.
22 févr. 2020 à 1 h 3
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
Quoting: TMLSage
Sounds like Ducks are in much better shape than the Sharks and Kings to return to a highly competitive team faster. There is a trade off to consider whether to hold on to proven veteran players to help mentor the team's younger players vs trade them off for younger players and draft picks in rebuilding a hockey team. Not saying what is best for the Ducks but sometimes the fastest way to rebuild is to tear down a team and then complete rebuild.


I've been saying this for months, and this Kase trade shows that A. GMBM is f*cking clueless at player evaluations, and B. He has no plan for the team, you don't trade Kase unless you're just selling everything in which case you sell your Rico's and your Silf's and your Getz's etc, but we're not doing that, and even if we were to do that, it's not nessicary, this team isn't that far away, and that loaded down with terrible contracts, nor are they stuck in the mediocrity of a Minnesota, we're bad enough on our own that we'll be able to fill one of our two main voids at the draft this summer (along with Zegras and Kase/Raks I wouldn't have been that worried about our long term forward group... Now this just places a lot more pressure on Raks to maintain his top line calibre play) then we'd be one or two pieces away from being a dark horse team, but GMBM is clueless
TMLSage et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage