SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

If flames miss the playoffs should Gaudreau be traded

Créé par: CrazySteveC
Équipe: 2019-20 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 7 févr. 2020
Publié: 7 févr. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de SJS
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2021
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2481 500 000 $68 805 042 $0 $665 000 $12 694 958 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
5 900 000 $5 900 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
715 000 $715 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
AG, AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 675 000 $1 675 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 650 400 $4 650 400 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 857 143 $3 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
755 833 $755 833 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
7 févr. 2020 à 23 h 0
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 6,731
Mentions "j'aime": 4,825
Barkov is worth more than that
Gofnut999 a aimé ceci.
7 févr. 2020 à 23 h 16
#2
Xx_Zegras46_xX
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 3,960
Mentions "j'aime": 1,658
That would never happen
7 févr. 2020 à 23 h 18
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 223
Mentions "j'aime": 55
He may be worth a bit more than that but I'd actually get behind a trade for Barkov. Gives the flames options to move players between centre and wing. Better 1-2 punch at centre than we have now. Could keep Monahan at centre and put Lindholm at wing to maximize his scoring potential or vice versa. If be prepared to give up a bit more for Barkov
tsyls a aimé ceci.
7 févr. 2020 à 23 h 31
#4
CGY
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2015
Messages: 5,551
Mentions "j'aime": 2,069
Why the heck would Florida trade a player who is substantially better than Gaudreau
CheeseFees a aimé ceci.
7 févr. 2020 à 23 h 36
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,081
Mentions "j'aime": 1,433
Quoting: CPH
He may be worth a bit more than that but I'd actually get behind a trade for Barkov. Gives the flames options to move players between centre and wing. Better 1-2 punch at centre than we have now. Could keep Monahan at centre and put Lindholm at wing to maximize his scoring potential or vice versa. If be prepared to give up a bit more for Barkov


And what do Calgary have to offer that would be interesting enough for Florida to listen to that offer? I mean Gaudreau is a really good players but Barkov is a big two way center on a bargain deal and who is younger. Florida would want monahan back with valimaki and rasmus Anderson. Maybe a first round pick with that. Player like barkov are not traded because no one would ever gave up half of a team to acquire them.
7 févr. 2020 à 23 h 42
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 223
Mentions "j'aime": 55
Quoting: Sebybbq
And what do Calgary have to offer that would be interesting enough for Florida to listen to that offer? I mean Gaudreau is a really good players but Barkov is a big two way center on a bargain deal and who is younger. Florida would want monahan back with valimaki and rasmus Anderson. Maybe a first round pick with that. Player like barkov are not traded because no one would ever gave up half of a team to acquire them.


He's definitely worth more than posted in this trade but you don't get another top centre, plus a projected top pairing defenceman, plus another top 4 defenceman, plus a 1st for him. What you trade a centre like Barkov for is pieces that give you more depth to your roster. He may not be instantly replaceable in one player but you can get proper value to push forward in your rebuild. A 5 year rebuild means Barkov won't fit in when you're done. So take the trade throw in a 1st and maybe another prospect and maybe that'll work. But the flames don't dismantle the team to get him. Barkov isn't Eichel so you have to be careful not to over value him.
8 févr. 2020 à 0 h 9
#7
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,081
Mentions "j'aime": 1,433
Quoting: CPH
He's definitely worth more than posted in this trade but you don't get another top centre, plus a projected top pairing defenceman, plus another top 4 defenceman, plus a 1st for him. What you trade a centre like Barkov for is pieces that give you more depth to your roster. He may not be instantly replaceable in one player but you can get proper value to push forward in your rebuild. A 5 year rebuild means Barkov won't fit in when you're done. So take the trade throw in a 1st and maybe another prospect and maybe that'll work. But the flames don't dismantle the team to get him. Barkov isn't Eichel so you have to be careful not to over value him.


Barkov is on the same level as eichel! What are you talking about with the rebuilt? The panthers are not in rebuilt this is why they would ask for that kind of return. You sure don’t are aware of what is goiing on in Nhl. Florida a rebuilding team, they have been rebuilding for the past 10 years they have a tons of excellent players. Trading a top 10 centerman for quantity is always a bad trade except if you get a major overpayments. There is no way the panthers would even consider trading barkov for that return even with 2 first round pick added. A late first round pick have not the values of a all star players.
lRONHlDE31 et CheeseFees a aimé ceci.
8 févr. 2020 à 0 h 56
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 281
Mentions "j'aime": 31
I wanna trade him now but we are not getting barkov
8 févr. 2020 à 0 h 57
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 223
Mentions "j'aime": 55
Quoting: Sebybbq
Barkov is on the same level as eichel! What are you talking about with the rebuilt? The panthers are not in rebuilt this is why they would ask for that kind of return. You sure don’t are aware of what is goiing on in Nhl. Florida a rebuilding team, they have been rebuilding for the past 10 years they have a tons of excellent players. Trading a top 10 centerman for quantity is always a bad trade except if you get a major overpayments. There is no way the panthers would even consider trading barkov for that return even with 2 first round pick added. A late first round pick have not the values of a all star players.


I think I may have been thinking of Minnesota for some reason...
8 févr. 2020 à 0 h 57
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 5,120
Mentions "j'aime": 1,850
Would have to be Monahan + if u want Barkov
They’d want a Center back
And why would they even entertain moving Barkov?
8 févr. 2020 à 1 h 1
#11
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,081
Mentions "j'aime": 1,433
Quoting: CPH
I think I may have been thinking of Minnesota for some reason...


Ok Minnesota will take at least 5 years to rebuilt somethibg decent. I totally agree with you there. They have a old roster and long term contract to almost every 30 + years old players. And they have one of the worst prospect farm system in the league. Not a great mix for success
8 févr. 2020 à 2 h 40
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,187
Mentions "j'aime": 184
I'd trade him now
8 févr. 2020 à 9 h 49
#13
HabsFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 5,448
Mentions "j'aime": 933
Barkov is a NO NO NO from FL....
Try Gaudreau for Johansen in Smashville instead if you are looking for a big C
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage