"To be anger"

At least learn proper grammar when trying to troll.

Not even a grammatical error, instead it was a typo. That was a well executed burn there champ. If you understand the proper syntax of the grammar used in the statement you'll see it was correct. The mistake was in dropping the y when typing. A common typo that occurs from time to time. Do you still want to keep doing this? Because you aren't doing a good job.

F for attempt here.

Lol Grammar

F

The hot dog vendor who parks daily at Front and John Sts. just lost his most reliable customer.

Almost every afternoon at 2:30 p.m., often wearing a toque, Phil Kessel would wander from his neighbourhood condominium to consume his daily snack.

And now he’s gone. Just like that. The Maple Leafs could no longer stomach having Kessel around, the first player to be both punished and rewarded for the saddest Leafs season in history. The Leafs held their breath, plugged their noses, and ostensibly gave Kessel to the Pittsburgh Penguins because they couldn’t stand having him around anymore.

Really, this was as much about illness and insomnia as anything else: The Leafs were sick and tired of Kessel.

Sick of his act. Tired of his lack of responsibility. Unwilling to begin any reset or rebuild with their highest-paid, most talented, least-dedicated player. He didn’t eat right, train right, play right. This had to happen for Brendan Shanahan to begin his rebuilding of the Leafs. Separation between the Leafs and Kessel became necessary when it grew more and more apparent with time that everything Shanahan values was upended by Kessel’s singular, laissez-faire, flippant, mostly uncoachable ways.

It doesn’t matter that the Leafs didn’t get much for Kessel. It doesn’t matter that the players they received for Kessel are probably named “if” and “but,” and the draft picks won’t translate into anything before 2019. None of that matters as coach Mike Babcock begins his new era of hope in September.

What matters is that Kessel is gone. That who he is, what he represents, what he isn’t, had to be removed from the ice, from the dressing room, from the road, from the restaurants — from everywhere. They couldn’t have him around anymore and be honest about the direction they intend to pursue. Everything they believe in for the future is almost everything Kessel has proven to be lacking in.

A Leafs front-office voice recently spoke about the two largest influences on any player. One comes from the coach. The other comes from the player who sits beside you on the bench. Those are the voices you hear most often.

For Tyler Bozak and James van Riemsdyk, that voice belonged to Kessel.

If the voice is negative, critical, disruptive, condescending of players, critical of coaches, critical of fans, then that impacts more than just the player doing the talking. It poisons the environment. It brings players down. It cuts into their effectiveness. It establishes the kind of mood no team wants.

The right kind of leadership can make a team greater.

The wrong kind can destroy it.

The second-half Leafs were the most destroyed team in Toronto history. The flag carrier of despair was Kessel. He played like he didn’t care, insulted the jersey, the paying public, the people watching at home, the interim coaching staff. He wasn’t alone.

But he was the only one making $8 million a year. He was the only one truly entrusted to make an offensive difference. He was the only one who seemed to take people down with him.

When Dave Nonis was fired, when the Leafs scouting staff was fired, when the coaches were fired, it finally turned to the players. Kessel was the first to go. He won’t be the last. But sending him packing first was necessary. The message was necessary. The tone was necessary. This won’t be tolerated any longer.

Even if this is a Vince Carter-type of trade — the kind that may bring next to nothing in return. Carter quit on the Raptors. In a different kind of way, Kessel quit on the Leafs before they quit on him.

Kasperi Kapanen is a Leaf now. His stock has been dropping since Pittsburgh used a first-round pick to select him. Some people consider him a future third-liner, if he has a future in the NHL at all.

Scott Harrington is a Leaf now. He played four years for Mark Hunter’s London Knights. When they couldn’t come away with one of the Penguins’ better defensive prospects, they settled on the competitive Harrington. He is an AHL skater, scouts tell me. Maybe he’ll play in the NHL. Maybe not.

The best part of the deal is the lottery-protected first-round pick for next June’s draft. It’s nice to have that kind of pick going forward. But expect a choice between 20 and 30. That’s a long shot. Maybe three years away. Maybe more.

And you have to figure Kessel is good to score 40 goals or more playing alongside either Sidney Crosby or Evgeni Malkin in Pittsburgh. And, still, this is a deal the Leafs had to make. A deal that was necessary.

They had to move Kessel out. They had to have him off the roster by the time Babcock begins training camp in September. You can’t have him half-assing skating drills with a team trying to learn how to work. You can’t have him being first off the ice with a team pushing to reach Babcock’s lofty goals. When you have an illness, you must get rid of the poison.

The Leafs did that on Wednesday. They treated their own infection — the Penguins playing the part of antibiotic. It doesn’t matter what they got for Kessel. What matters is he’s gone.

Weber has negative value. I'm not sure how that isn't clear...

"Almost guarantee to win the cup"???? There are 32 teams in the league. Even if there was some way to add Weber and price to the Leafs I still wouldn't give them over maybe a 25% chance of winning the cup. No matter what if you ever have a choice between betting on a team winning the cup or the field (ie every other team) always bet the field. There are 32 teams.

Did you really just call a person cancer?

Yes, the defensive defensemen who is on pace for 68 points has negative value. Let's also forget that he's one of the better leaders in the game and can play heavy minutes.

When I say almost a guarantee to win the cup, I mean it would easily make them one of the favorites entering the playoffs to make the playoffs. There are ideally 10-12 teams that could actually contend for the cup.

Yes because he's a cancer.

He's not a defensive defenseman, he's a two way defenseman. He's 34 and has 6 years after this one making nearly 8 million.

He is certainly useful for you right now, but his contract is a massive albatross.

Then that's what you should have said. Not "almost guarantee to win the cup"

No. Just no. Cancer is a horrible disease and isn't an insult to call someone. The term locker room cancer needs to stop and certainly calling someone a cancer is horrible. I think this is something we can all agree on. Don't belittle that horrible illness by making it an insult used on a hockey blog.

You described him perfectly. ****ing horrible disease.

Have you seriously not ever heard of someone calling another person cancer?

I have and it has to stop. But I haven't that much. And I certainly haven't seen it in the context used here. But I am done with this conversation if you still insist on describing a person this way

Isn't that the reaction that is suppose to happen when you call someone a bad name? These days, Moron, Idiot, Loser just get brushed off. This is the kind of reaction someone would want the other person to react like when using that word. It works perfect.