SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Read the Description.

Créé par: Garitjax
Équipe: 2016-17 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 11 juill. 2016
Publié: 11 juill. 2016
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Duchene trade based on supposed availability. Fowler is a 2-3 D and the Ducks add a first. Maybe another prospect in order to get the deal done. Stoner dropped for money reasons. I gave Lindholm a 6 year deal but built the bridge deal into it. 3-3-5-6.7-6.8-7. This combine with the other over and under deals like JB and the Twins, the Ducks actually sit 2.5 mill below their cap number. This puts actual Salary around 70.4 mill. Obviously it is still pretty high. But not as bad as it looks. Last year the Ducks Spent about 67 mill in salary. Its been reported that the number would go up. Plus the money the Ducks would get from the expansion team. It might not be so unfeasible to think the budget could be this high.

Edit: It was brought to my attention that Gibson is also back loaded giving the Ducks another 800k below their cap number. putting this roster at 69.6 mill
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
65 250 000 $
22 750 000 $
2800 000 $
Transactions
1.
COL
  1. Fowler, Cam
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2017 (ANA)
2.
ANA
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2017 (NJD)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2017
Logo de ANA
Logo de TOR
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de NJD
2018
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2019
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2373 000 000 $70 499 167 $0 $850 000 $2 500 833 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
UFA - 2
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
8 625 000 $8 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 5
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 6
900 000 $900 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 6
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
675 000 $675 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
637 500 $637 500 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
C
UFA - 1
900 000 $900 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
825 000 $825 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
G
UFA - 1
3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
2 437 500 $2 437 500 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
G
UFA - 3
863 333 $863 333 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 2
600 000 $600 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
11 juill. 2016 à 8 h 39
#1
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 16,248
Mentions "j'aime": 10,792
Don't have a real issue with the trade. This team just has a really expensive 3C now. Think with Duchene's speed he could swap with Rakell?
11 juill. 2016 à 9 h 32
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 4,789
Mentions "j'aime": 1,205
One of Duchene's strengths is his ridiculous faceoff percentage. No way he wouldn't play center.
11 juill. 2016 à 9 h 44
#3
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 61,369
Mentions "j'aime": 23,634
Yea, I really don't think Duchene is the answer at centre for the Ducks. If cap is going be a issue in the next few years...maybe Fowler or another "excess Dman could be traded for younger guys on ELCs.
11 juill. 2016 à 9 h 47
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 16
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Hampus's deal is illegal due to the 35% variance rule
11 juill. 2016 à 10 h 7
#5
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 61,369
Mentions "j'aime": 23,634
Quoting: jmacattack
Hampus's deal is illegal due to the 35% variance rule


Hi jmacattack. Could you explain this variance rule? Thanks.
11 juill. 2016 à 15 h 25
#6
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 16,248
Mentions "j'aime": 10,792
My bad...i meant Kesler....didnt review the post.
11 juill. 2016 à 18 h 51
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 430
Mentions "j'aime": 60
Quoting: jmacattack
Hampus's deal is illegal due to the 35% variance rule
I believe that rule only applies to decline in salary, Not increases. For example, look at Gibsons most recent deal. 1.5-2.1-3.3. From year 1 to year 2 is an increase of 40% and from year 2-3 is almost 58% increase.

Quoting: palhal
Yea, I really don't think Duchene is the answer at centre for the Ducks. If cap is going be a issue in the next few years...maybe Fowler or another "excess Dman could be traded for younger guys on ELCs.
I chose a proven center because we can't wait and hope for a player to be successful. I don't think there are any centers who give us a good enough chance to make a 3rd line legitimately dangerous. Spooner might be the best bet in that regard and the only player that could likely be available. LD from EDM isn't going anywhere, not is Reinhart from Buffalo. There really aren't any cheap centers that would even get close to the impact that Duchene could have on the roster. IMO.
12 juill. 2016 à 12 h 57
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 93
Mentions "j'aime": 4
If you can get Duchene, this looks pretty good, but even adding some prospects, I don't think Colorado does this.

If something like this does happen, this would look great. Lines would probably solid 1st, young and creative 2nd, shutdown 3rd, who knows 4th.
Ritchie / Getz / Perry
Rakell / Duchene / Silf
Garbutt / Kesler / Cogs
Raymond / Wagner / Boll

Defense looks good if Despres can get healthy.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage