SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Puljujarvi

Créé par: Shakabakes
Équipe: 2019-20 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 6 nov. 2019
Publié: 6 nov. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Considering his production at this point, I don't see the Oilers getting better than a 2nd.

I like Lindgren, but I think he eventually gets lost in the upcoming blue line depth the Rangers have in their system. Has played well in limited time Quinn has given him.
Transactions
NYR
  1. Puljujärvi, Jesse [Liste de réserve]
EDM
  1. Lindgren, Ryan
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (NYR)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de NYR
Logo de DAL
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NSH
Logo de VAN
2021
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de BUF
Logo de NYR
Logo de OTT
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2022
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $78 939 799 $0 $4 832 500 $2 560 201 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Rangers de New York
11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 625 000 $4 625 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 850 000 $1 850 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 700 000 $5 700 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 350 000 $4 350 000 $
DG/DD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
833 333 $833 333 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 nov. 2019 à 14 h 28
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 233
Mentions "j'aime": 78
In 3 years his points per season average is 21. Chances are you could draft a similar if not better player with that 2nd round pick.
AJC13 et Shakabakes a aimé ceci.
6 nov. 2019 à 14 h 35
#2
AJC13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 1,313
Mentions "j'aime": 272
Lindgren's a heavy hitter. Your way over rating Puljujarvi.
Shakabakes a aimé ceci.
6 nov. 2019 à 14 h 54
#3
Jaromir_Jagr_the_leg
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 3,859
Mentions "j'aime": 787
I think ur completely wrong about lindgren he will be a 7th dman/ swapping for the 6th guy. And in no way are the rangers giving up a 2nd to get poolparty. Not to mention they don’t have the 2nd round pick anymore bc it was included in the fox deal
6 nov. 2019 à 15 h 0
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 27
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Puljujärvi is not in the NHL right now for a reason, leave it alone. And to give up a top prospect like Lindgren AND a high pick is INSANE.
Shakabakes a aimé ceci.
6 nov. 2019 à 15 h 5
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,991
Mentions "j'aime": 877
Quoting: NYR724
Puljujärvi is not in the NHL right now for a reason, leave it alone. And to give up a top prospect like Lindgren AND a high pick is INSANE.


What if it was a 3rd? I understand that I think Lindgren has played well. I just see him getting lost behind Miller, Lundkvist and maybe even Rykov when they are ready.
6 nov. 2019 à 15 h 15
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,788
Mentions "j'aime": 208
would you move Howden or Andersson instead? 1 for 1
6 nov. 2019 à 15 h 22
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,991
Mentions "j'aime": 877
Quoting: oilnate
would you move Howden or Andersson instead? 1 for 1


Howden, yes. Andersson I am not ready to give up on. If Quinn ever gives him more than 8 minutes a night with someone other than Michael Haley and Brendan Smith, I would be interested to see what he is really capable of.
6 nov. 2019 à 15 h 32
#8
Tspky
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 3,885
Mentions "j'aime": 980
Quoting: Shakabakes
Howden, yes. Andersson I am not ready to give up on. If Quinn ever gives him more than 8 minutes a night with someone other than Michael Haley and Brendan Smith, I would be interested to see what he is really capable of.


Howden I would do one for one.

The rangers D-core is just a mess right now and i think Ruff has a lot to do with that. Just look at what happened to Skjei after he was hired-- he went from being one of the most promising defensive prospects in the NHL to being a liability.

Lindgren may not have a long term place on the roster with Miller, Robertson, Jones, etc. (and Hajek already above him on the depth chart) but there would be no 2nd round pick required. A 2nd itself would get puljujarvi at this point.
Shakabakes a aimé ceci.
6 nov. 2019 à 15 h 36
#9
Lets Go Blues
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 6,786
Mentions "j'aime": 4,336
Quoting: TopLineTom43
In 3 years his points per season average is 21. Chances are you could draft a similar if not better player with that 2nd round pick.


This is bad logic. A 2nd rounder has like a 40% of playing 50+ games(!) in the NHL. That's not a very high watermark and only 40% of guys hit it. Everyone thinks they're getting Sebastian Aho when they're more likely to get Tommy Vannelli.

Also, you're using JP's NHL production in his D+1,2,3 years to call his ceiling 21 points. Most guys haven't even played more than a cup of coffee in the NHL by that point. Mika Zibanejad had 54 pts in his first 120 GP with pretty similar usage to JP (12-13 min TOI, some PP2). Is he a 36 pt player?

Sure, EDM screwed with his development, but people act like JP is a lost cause just because he moved on from the team that ruined his confidence. I think it will take a legitimate trade piece from the team that acquires him. Not just a late pick or some iffy prospect. Something like the deal proposed here could make some sense - IMO I think EDM will be able to find a prospect that they really like and make a swap.
Shakabakes, oilnate et CD282 a aimé ceci.
6 nov. 2019 à 16 h 2
#10
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 233
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Quoting: A_K
This is bad logic. A 2nd rounder has like a 40% of playing 50+ games(!) in the NHL. That's not a very high watermark and only 40% of guys hit it. Everyone thinks they're getting Sebastian Aho when they're more likely to get Tommy Vannelli.

Also, you're using JP's NHL production in his D+1,2,3 years to call his ceiling 21 points. Most guys haven't even played more than a cup of coffee in the NHL by that point. Mika Zibanejad had 54 pts in his first 120 GP with pretty similar usage to JP (12-13 min TOI, some PP2). Is he a 36 pt player?

Sure, EDM screwed with his development, but people act like JP is a lost cause just because he moved on from the team that ruined his confidence. I think it will take a legitimate trade piece from the team that acquires him. Not just a late pick or some iffy prospect. Something like the deal proposed here could make some sense - IMO I think EDM will be able to find a prospect that they really like and make a swap.


Not bad logic at all. He can easily turn it around but what’s to say he’s just another HoSang or Yak? Why invest in that? What has he done in his NHL career that would make you believe he’s worth a 2nd and a player? A guy like Burakovsky got a 2nd and a 3rd and people thought that was a massive overpayment but he at least showed some offensive hope or some scoring touch. He’s not most guys ...suggested by his trade value. He’s a top 5 nhl draft pick from the last 3 years. So you shouldn’t expect him to be most guys....the fact he’s either not nearly as good as you think or he’s being misused. He’s basically a Brett Connelly 2.0. He might get rescued by the right team(Washington) or fail when he was traded to Boston. For every Zibanejad example there 2 that counter your point.
6 nov. 2019 à 16 h 19
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,124
Mentions "j'aime": 7,781
6 nov. 2019 à 16 h 38
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,788
Mentions "j'aime": 208
Quoting: Spanky227
Howden I would do one for one.

The rangers D-core is just a mess right now and i think Ruff has a lot to do with that. Just look at what happened to Skjei after he was hired-- he went from being one of the most promising defensive prospects in the NHL to being a liability.

Lindgren may not have a long term place on the roster with Miller, Robertson, Jones, etc. (and Hajek already above him on the depth chart) but there would be no 2nd round pick required. A 2nd itself would get puljujarvi at this point.


disagree, oilers have said they want a second and a prospect. Mind you that prospect is more of a B level prospect. A number of teams have interest but nobody wants to have a bidding war
6 nov. 2019 à 16 h 45
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,788
Mentions "j'aime": 208
Quoting: TopLineTom43
Not bad logic at all. He can easily turn it around but what’s to say he’s just another HoSang or Yak? Why invest in that? What has he done in his NHL career that would make you believe he’s worth a 2nd and a player? A guy like Burakovsky got a 2nd and a 3rd and people thought that was a massive overpayment but he at least showed some offensive hope or some scoring touch. He’s not most guys ...suggested by his trade value. He’s a top 5 nhl draft pick from the last 3 years. So you shouldn’t expect him to be most guys....the fact he’s either not nearly as good as you think or he’s being misused. He’s basically a Brett Connelly 2.0. He might get rescued by the right team(Washington) or fail when he was traded to Boston. For every Zibanejad example there 2 that counter your point.


I think the Oilers organization as a whole would admit that they screwed up his development. Now he is getting back on track in Finland and looks much better. Young players are usually slow to produce as was he, Howden and Andersson haven't taken off either. Scoring comes gradually for most young players, as they have to adjust to a professional pace, skill, and play. JP didn't fit the system for the Oilers as at times he seemed lost, and playing with Lucic never helped him score. Do i think given this year to boost his confidence he can come back and be an effective top 9, top 6 player? Yes, provided he buys into the system of the team he goes to (which I think he would just needs a fresh start) , and isn't surrounded by a couple of plugs
6 nov. 2019 à 16 h 54
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 27
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Quoting: Shakabakes
What if it was a 3rd? I understand that I think Lindgren has played well. I just see him getting lost behind Miller, Lundkvist and maybe even Rykov when they are ready.


How about we just trade for a center? That is what we really need.
6 nov. 2019 à 16 h 55
#15
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 233
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Quoting: oilnate
I think the Oilers organization as a whole would admit that they screwed up his development. Now he is getting back on track in Finland and looks much better. Young players are usually slow to produce as was he, Howden and Andersson haven't taken off either. Scoring comes gradually for most young players, as they have to adjust to a professional pace, skill, and play. JP didn't fit the system for the Oilers as at times he seemed lost, and playing with Lucic never helped him score. Do i think given this year to boost his confidence he can come back and be an effective top 9, top 6 player? Yes, provided he buys into the system of the team he goes to (which I think he would just needs a fresh start) , and isn't surrounded by a couple of plugs


I can agree with what you’re saying. I’m not a fan of paying for potential and that’s not always the best way to go about business. If the oilers think he can come back and become a stud they shouldn’t trade him. I personally am not a fan of his play but I haven’t watched too many of his games.
6 nov. 2019 à 20 h 24
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,991
Mentions "j'aime": 877
Quoting: NYR724
How about we just trade for a center? That is what we really need.


I agree. If we move DeAngelo, that is the only thing I would move him for. A valuable 2C for a valuable RHD.
7 nov. 2019 à 9 h 33
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,124
Mentions "j'aime": 7,781
Quoting: oilnate
would you move Howden or Andersson instead? 1 for 1


Quoting: Shakabakes
Howden, yes.


Quoting: Spanky227
Howden I would do one for one.


That's interesting. I think Holland would consider that.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage