SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

What are the Hawks most glaring flaws

Créé par: Kyle_Davidson
Équipe: 2019-20 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 3 nov. 2019
Publié: 3 nov. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I'm a Blackhawks fan, obviously... but usually I can diagnose what problem the team has, and what players they need to get rid of, or the type of player they need to aquire to be better. However with this team its different... I was sold hard on this team being decent, and obviously they arent. Now I look at this team, and although I know our Forwards are a big problem I cant think of any move that would make a meaningful difference, hold for proper line combos.

so please, someone tell me where this team is going wrong, because it seems to be good enough to do SOMETHING on paper, but they fail they eye test miserably.

Players who are playing Bad: This is the group of players that are not playing at the level that they should be. This includes point scorers not scoring, play driving players not driving play (say that three times fast), and role players that are not bringing anything meaningful to the lineup.

Players Playing Okay: Players who aren't exactly a problem, but are not playing as well as they can, or should.

Players playing Good: These are the players that I assess as playing well on this terrible team. Note that the Goalies are included in this column, they are just below the border between right wingers and goalies.


Looking at my list I see a lot of out top guys are still not producing, Debrincat has been brutal, and Toews and Kane are not producing enough.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Players that are playing, Bad
1925 000 $
Players that are playing, Okay
1925 000 $
Players that are playing, Good
1925 000 $
Terrible, Coach
1925 000 $
Clown Car, Jeremy Colition
1925 000 $
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2781 500 000 $68 501 686 $0 $6 707 500 $12 998 314 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Players that are playing, Bad
925 000 $925 000 $
Players that are playing, Okay
925 000 $925 000 $
Players that are playing, Good
925 000 $925 000 $
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 333 225 $3 333 225 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance2 475 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Terrible, Coach
925 000 $925 000 $
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Clown Car, Jeremy Colition
925 000 $925 000 $
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
3 nov. 2019 à 15 h 32
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 5,011
Mentions "j'aime": 1,636
Kane has been amazing this season.
3 nov. 2019 à 15 h 37
#2
Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 7,004
Mentions "j'aime": 2,853
I think your experiment here sums it up pretty well. There's no "Good" defenseman on this team. Gustafsson's regression has caused this team to have the same start as last season. If Gustafsson can pick his play back up this team will be fine as every team needs a defenseman that acts as a 4th forward. Murphy is a good shut down guy, De Haan and Maatta are still getting acclimated, and I think the lack of offense is because Colliton fails to stick with what works. Meaning, Strome is suddenly a winger, Dach is on line 4 with plugs, Kubalik finally gets put on a good PP unit and he scores (shocker! A good player needs to play with good players?!). It's simple, give the best players the most ice time.
Roviet_Sussia a aimé ceci.
3 nov. 2019 à 15 h 55
#3
CHI NYI
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 4,676
Mentions "j'aime": 2,256
I don't know if the analytics support this, but for me it's their breakouts. They're slow, lazy and predictable. As a result, they always seemed penned in their own zone and never get quality offensive chances. Again, I don't know if the numbers back that up, but those are my observations. Their CF% is terrible, so they're obviously getting outshot and outchanced, so I imagine they're below average defensemen also have a hard time getting the puck out
Roviet_Sussia et HatterTParty a aimé ceci.
3 nov. 2019 à 19 h 17
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 464
Mentions "j'aime": 328
Ive seen parts of every games this years and it almost looks like the coaching staff has a different strategy for every game. The only way I can describe it is like a football team where they adjust their game plan based on the team they are playing. Ive noticed different break outs, in the Nashville game all the wingers were trying the one touch tip breakout.

I dont know if anyone else has noticed this, it could be that they are struggling to learn the new system or its Collitons theory that he can have different playing styles based on their opponent, which may suggest why the lines are flopping every game.

I have no real proof to this theory besides watching the forwards look lost in their own end every game.
3 nov. 2019 à 20 h 58
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,351
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: ForsbergForVezina
I don't know if the analytics support this, but for me it's their breakouts. They're slow, lazy and predictable. As a result, they always seemed penned in their own zone and never get quality offensive chances. Again, I don't know if the numbers back that up, but those are my observations. Their CF% is terrible, so they're obviously getting outshot and outchanced, so I imagine they're below average defensemen also have a hard time getting the puck out


Ahhhh. Finally, someone is addressing the biggest problem, at least in my opinion. The defense can block as many shots as they want, but if they can’t skate or pass, how the hell is the breakout suppose to work?
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage