SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Keep Neal and dont get Lucic

Créé par: peeps
Équipe: 2019-20 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 9 oct. 2019
Publié: 9 oct. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Talbot to WPG just so you understand I never signed him. Went with the cheaper route with Neuvirth.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
1700 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
CGY
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2022 (WPG)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2021
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de WPG
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $70 438 376 $0 $140 000 $11 061 624 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 300 000 $4 300 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
715 000 $715 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 675 000 $1 675 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 650 400 $4 650 400 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 857 143 $3 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
755 833 $755 833 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
DD
UFA - 1
700 000 $700 000 $
G
UFA
Logo de Flames de Calgary
730 833 $730 833 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
9 oct. 2019 à 0 h 34
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 17,051
Mentions "j'aime": 12,056
At least Calgary will get a 3rd out of the Lucic trade. Because Neal is scoring 20 goals.
9 oct. 2019 à 0 h 35
#2
CGY
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2015
Messages: 5,544
Mentions "j'aime": 2,066
The crazy thing is.... he didn’t fit with the Flames. He’s too similar to Monahan and that line would have been a defensive liability with 2 weak skaters. The Backlund line is a shutdown line, not what neal is known for. Factor that in and you end up exactly where he played... bottom 6, also had issues with Peters. It was a shortsighted signing by Treliving
CN10 a aimé ceci.
9 oct. 2019 à 0 h 37
#3
GloryDaysAreBack
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,095
Mentions "j'aime": 469
You're just hurting yourself trying to go back in time and change things. At least you didn't trade anything to get Neal in the first place. He was just a UFA signing. So hey! Just think of it as a 5+million dollar checking forward for the next 4 years for FREE! YAAAAY!
9 oct. 2019 à 2 h 21
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,470
Mentions "j'aime": 19,634
Neal would not be scoring in CGY he had no synergy with anyone on the Flames top 6 roster and is not a viable bottom 6 player since he is defensively challenged. Lucic is not know for being a goal scorer and we don't need him to be, we were 2nd in the league last year for goals and Neal only had 7. Meanwhile Looch has come out every game so far and made an impact physically. The hindsight was never with the trade it was always with the signing in the first place.
CN10 a aimé ceci.
9 oct. 2019 à 11 h 16
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 408
Mentions "j'aime": 176
Neal has looked great so far, but there was about a month of 0.5 PPG play out of Neal last year where we felt like he was turning it around. If he's still scoring by US Thanksgiving then we can look back on the deal as a disaster. I was worried about Neal bouncing back when the trade was announced, but as other posters have mentioned it wouldn't have happened here due to him being a poor fit in our top 6 and the player not having any drive whatsoever when he was playing on the third line. Lucic has brought some of the snarl the Flames were missing at least and the room seems to like him. When Neal's not scoring he looks like a beer leaguer floating around out there. Perhaps over the course of a long season the swap looks better from a Calgary perspective.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage