SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Mantha 1 for 1 deal with CAR

Créé par: feds91stammer
Équipe: 2020-21 Red Wings de Detroit
Date de création initiale: 3 sept. 2019
Publié: 3 sept. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Its trade Mantha day so I did this since I am bored at work.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
55 250 000 $
21 500 000 $
21 500 000 $
21 000 000 $
21 500 000 $
54 750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
37 000 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Raymond Perfetti, Lafreniere Byfield
3925 000 $
Transactions
CAR
  1. Mantha, Anthony [Droits de RFA]
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de WSH
Logo de DET
Logo de SJS
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
2021
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de VGK
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
2022
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 000 000 $67 471 388 $0 $2 740 000 $15 528 612 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Raymond Perfetti, Lafreniere Byfield
925 000 $925 000 $
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance537 500 $$538K)
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
C
RFA - 3
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
714 166 $714 166 $ (Bonis de performance157 500 $$158K)
DD
RFA - 1
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
G
UFA - 5
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
894 167 $894 167 $
DD
RFA - 4
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
894 166 $894 166 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
775 833 $775 833 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
6 083 333 $6 083 333 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
C, AD, AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
3 sept. 2019 à 13 h 11
#1
Canes Baby
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 4,509
Mentions "j'aime": 1,250
Quoting: acj
your defesne sucks and you need to get knew right wings.


I suggested taking Faulk from the Canes, but apparently 'he sucks' and is not good enough for the Wings wink
3 sept. 2019 à 13 h 16
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 1,760
Mentions "j'aime": 801
Quoting: jslongo
I suggested taking Faulk from the Canes, but apparently 'he sucks' and is not good enough for the Wings wink


That guy is a troll but uh yeah Faulk was CARs worst D man in terms of WAR60 last season and DET has 6 D they can roster that had better WAR60 than Faulk.
3 sept. 2019 à 13 h 16
#3
Canes Baby
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 4,509
Mentions "j'aime": 1,250
Quoting: acj
falk is a defensmen stupid. stop defending your feds91stamer friend. Or is the relationship worse?


Exactly, Faulk is a defenseman, thats why I suggested him...
3 sept. 2019 à 13 h 16
#4
Canes Baby
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 4,509
Mentions "j'aime": 1,250
Quoting: feds91stammer
That guy is a troll but uh yeah Faulk was CARs worst D man in terms of WAR60 last season and DET has 6 D they can roster that had better WAR60 than Faulk.


Faulk better than all 6
3 sept. 2019 à 13 h 17
#5
LGRW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 405
Mentions "j'aime": 112
Quoting: acj
your defesne sucks and you need to get knew right wings.


Knew wings? i dont "no" what yur sayn dud
3 sept. 2019 à 13 h 17
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 878
Mentions "j'aime": 115
yup you sure are. Everything I said was the facts.
3 sept. 2019 à 13 h 17
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 1,760
Mentions "j'aime": 801
Quoting: jslongo
Faulk better than all 6


He isn't but I understand why you would think that.
CD282 a aimé ceci.
3 sept. 2019 à 13 h 18
#8
Canes Baby
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 4,509
Mentions "j'aime": 1,250
Quoting: feds91stammer
He isn't but I understand why you would think that.


agree to disagree but Faulk is the #1 Dman on Detroit
3 sept. 2019 à 13 h 18
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 1,760
Mentions "j'aime": 801
Quoting: jslongo
agree to disagree but Faulk is the #1 Dman on Detroit


You have to be joking right?
3 sept. 2019 à 13 h 20
#10
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 878
Mentions "j'aime": 115
hes joking.
3 sept. 2019 à 13 h 30
#11
Canes Baby
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 4,509
Mentions "j'aime": 1,250
Quoting: jslongo
Tell me why you think any 1 of them is better than Faulk


https://www.nhl.com/news/nhl-fantasy-hockey-top-50-defenseman-rankings-2019-20/c-282830728

This doesnt really help my argument, but still says something... no detroit players to be seen over faulk
3 sept. 2019 à 13 h 30
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 1,760
Mentions "j'aime": 801
Quoting: jslongo
Tell me why you think any 1 of them is better than Faulk


Already gave you a basic summary with the WAR60. Faulk is an OFD PP specialist that barely produces offense anymore.
3 sept. 2019 à 13 h 31
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 1,760
Mentions "j'aime": 801
Quoting: jslongo
https://www.nhl.com/news/nhl-fantasy-hockey-top-50-defenseman-rankings-2019-20/c-282830728

This doesnt really help my argument, but still says something... no detroit players to be seen


LMAO this is all I needed to see. We are done here.

And you are so off here you didn't even realize there are 2 DET players on that list...

LMAO
3 sept. 2019 à 13 h 32
#14
Canes Baby
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 4,509
Mentions "j'aime": 1,250
Quoting: feds91stammer
LMAO this is all I needed to see. We are done here.


Thank you
3 sept. 2019 à 13 h 47
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 21,925
Mentions "j'aime": 12,161
Why trade Mantha for an unproven player? Detroit really needs to hold on to the good pieces they have. I do agree Detroit needs defense but let's be honest if Faulk is traded to Detroit there is little to no chance he resigns in Detroit.
3 sept. 2019 à 13 h 49
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 1,760
Mentions "j'aime": 801
Quoting: aedoran
Why trade Mantha for an unproven player? Detroit really needs to hold on to the good pieces they have. I do agree Detroit needs defense but let's be honest if Faulk is traded to Detroit there is little to no chance he resigns in Detroit.


Necas would be a great piece. Either you want to rebuild or you don't.
3 sept. 2019 à 13 h 54
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 21,925
Mentions "j'aime": 12,161
Quoting: feds91stammer
Necas would be a great piece. Either you want to rebuild or you don't.


The Wings are rebuilding and trading a true goal scorer for a kid who has done nothing but struggle at the NHL level. Yes he is young and he will probably end up being a very good player. It's a risk a rebuilding team shouldn't take.
3 sept. 2019 à 13 h 57
#18
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 1,760
Mentions "j'aime": 801
Quoting: aedoran
The Wings are rebuilding and trading a true goal scorer for a kid who has done nothing but struggle at the NHL level. Yes he is young and he will probably end up being a very good player. It's a risk a rebuilding team shouldn't take.


He got a cup of coffee just like Zadina and he had a great year in the AHL. Plus he has some experience playing with Zadina...
3 sept. 2019 à 14 h 17
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 21,925
Mentions "j'aime": 12,161
Quoting: feds91stammer
He got a cup of coffee just like Zadina and he had a great year in the AHL. Plus he has some experience playing with Zadina...


Yes the same Zadina who I'm still not convinced was the right choice he fell to Detroit and Detroit probably should've let him pass and gone with a defenseman. I think they should've passed on Rasmussen as well. When you are rebuilding you should go with a sure thing not players that several teams before you have passed on. Now the sure thing isn't as flashy but he gets the job done. The Wings drafted Mantha at 20 when he was projected to go around 10. Now the Wings were still in the playoffs and had a decent squad so they could risk taking a player who had dropped that many spots. Look at how long it took him to get to the NHL and be productive there. Trading him for Necas isn't the right move.
3 sept. 2019 à 14 h 21
#20
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 1,760
Mentions "j'aime": 801
Quoting: aedoran
Yes the same Zadina who I'm still not convinced was the right choice he fell to Detroit and Detroit probably should've let him pass and gone with a defenseman. I think they should've passed on Rasmussen as well. When you are rebuilding you should go with a sure thing not players that several teams before you have passed on. Now the sure thing isn't as flashy but he gets the job done. The Wings drafted Mantha at 20 when he was projected to go around 10. Now the Wings were still in the playoffs and had a decent squad so they could risk taking a player who had dropped that many spots. Look at how long it took him to get to the NHL and be productive there. Trading him for Necas isn't the right move.


I disagree on this entire post.
3 sept. 2019 à 14 h 23
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 21,925
Mentions "j'aime": 12,161
Modifié 3 sept. 2019 à 14 h 36
Quoting: feds91stammer
I disagree on this entire post.


Had to change my post it was rude.
3 sept. 2019 à 15 h 2
#22
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 1,760
Mentions "j'aime": 801
Quoting: aedoran
Had to change my post it was rude.


meh it was fine. I'm not going to get offended by someone making fun of my poor grammar.
3 sept. 2019 à 15 h 9
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 20,274
Mentions "j'aime": 5,143
Quoting: feds91stammer
Already gave you a basic summary with the WAR60. Faulk is an OFD PP specialist that barely produces offense anymore.


Wins above replacement? Really? Could you not use more accurate and meaningful stats? Try GAR, or RAMP, I don't know if either help Faulk in any situation, but WAR is not exactly the most reliable of stats when used on skaters
3 sept. 2019 à 15 h 11
#24
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 1,760
Mentions "j'aime": 801
Quoting: Caniac2000
Wins above replacement? Really? Could you not use more accurate and meaningful stats? Try GAR, or RAMP, I don't know if either help Faulk in any situation, but WAR is not exactly the most reliable of stats when used on skaters


I could look at RAPM but I don't care enough to dive into it. There is good reason the analytical group of Tulsky and Kan have not given Faulk an extension.
3 sept. 2019 à 15 h 18
#25
Canes Baby
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 4,509
Mentions "j'aime": 1,250
Quoting: feds91stammer
I could look at RAPM but I don't care enough to dive into it. There is good reason the analytical group of Tulsky and Kan have not given Faulk an extension.


They havent given him an extension yet because he hasnt even started his final year on his contract..,. Very rarely do players get extensions before their final year.

Extensions only happen like that to stars, I.e Vasilevsky
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage