SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

trade Ericsson

Créé par: audiodave
Équipe: 2019-20 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 10 août 2019
Publié: 10 août 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
25 000 000 $
21 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (TOR)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
TOR
  1. Tanev, Christopher (2 225 000 $ retained)
2.
BUF
  1. Eriksson, Loui (1 500 000 $ retained)
  2. Juolevi, Olli
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Frais appliqués
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de VAN
Logo de TOR
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de ANA
2021
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $79 168 545 $0 $3 700 000 $2 331 455 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 366 666 $3 366 666 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 375 000 $4 375 000 $
AD, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
975 000 $975 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 666 667 $3 666 667 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 325 000 $2 325 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
10 août 2019 à 1 h 45
#1
Vorg1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 244
Mentions "j'aime": 52
I think overpay and Buffalo doesn’t need yet another defenseman, better a forward prospect.
10 août 2019 à 3 h 18
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 8,303
Mentions "j'aime": 6,268
Yeah, buffalo doesnt touch that. Even at 4.5, eriksson is still a cap dump, and we have too many d. The value is bad and the fit is worse.
10 août 2019 à 10 h 34
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,352
Mentions "j'aime": 4,799
I mulled over this trade before responding.
I can see some merits as Eriksson is big winger that fits into the Botts mold.
IMO this is an easy pass for the Sabres. The second is not much, Juolevi does not seem to be an NHL player and Ericsson is 34 yo.
It may take a 2nd just to move Ericsson so the trade is Juolevi for Ristolainen.
No deal.

Quoting: Vorg_Vaarg
I think overpay and Buffalo doesn’t need yet another defenseman, better a forward prospect.


Quoting: sabres89
Yeah, buffalo doesnt touch that. Even at 4.5, eriksson is still a cap dump, and we have too many d. The value is bad and the fit is worse.
10 août 2019 à 10 h 54
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 3,930
Mentions "j'aime": 2,065
Quoting: gretzkyghosts
I mulled over this trade before responding.
I can see some merits as Eriksson is big winger that fits into the Botts mold.
IMO this is an easy pass for the Sabres. The second is not much, Juolevi does not seem to be an NHL player and Ericsson is 34 yo.
It may take a 2nd just to move Ericsson so the trade is Juolevi for Ristolainen.
No deal.


I think you’re significantly underestimating Juolevi. That said, I think Buffalo can get a better deal for Risto and Vancouver would be selling low on Juolevi.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
10 août 2019 à 11 h 34
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,352
Mentions "j'aime": 4,799
Quoting: sedin33
I think you’re significantly underestimating Juolevi. That said, I think Buffalo can get a better deal for Risto and Vancouver would be selling low on Juolevi.


OK. just to be clear I said the 2nd was to take Ericsson and Juolevi was for Ristolainen.
Is Juolevi that good that he can be equal to Ristolainen?
10 août 2019 à 12 h 13
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 3,930
Mentions "j'aime": 2,065
Quoting: gretzkyghosts
OK. just to be clear I said the 2nd was to take Ericsson and Juolevi was for Ristolainen.
Is Juolevi that good that he can be equal to Ristolainen?


I think he can be better the Risto, but that's a big bet for Buffalo. I agree that Buffalo passes on this deal. I disagree with your comment that Juolevi is not a NHL player.
GMTD et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
10 août 2019 à 12 h 45
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 8,303
Mentions "j'aime": 6,268
Quoting: gretzkyghosts
OK. just to be clear I said the 2nd was to take Ericsson and Juolevi was for Ristolainen.
Is Juolevi that good that he can be equal to Ristolainen?


I know that they are retaining here, you think eriksson at 4.5 for 3 years plus a second is enough to take a 34 year old winger that doesnt produce? Just curious, as i have said i wouldnt add a first to move okposo. Wonder if okposo at 4.5 plus a second is enough to move him for a box of fresh wyoming air.
GMTD a aimé ceci.
10 août 2019 à 13 h 32
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,352
Mentions "j'aime": 4,799
Quoting: sabres89
I know that they are retaining here, you think eriksson at 4.5 for 3 years plus a second is enough to take a 34 year old winger that doesnt produce? Just curious, as i have said i wouldnt add a first to move okposo. Wonder if okposo at 4.5 plus a second is enough to move him for a box of fresh wyoming air.


IDK what is the cost to take a salary. It cost a first for TML to unload Marleau for one year, it cost Tampa only a few spots to unload Callahan. It all depends on what a team wants.
Okposo is much more valuable than Lucic, Neal or Ericsson. Unfortunately he is over paid as a 3rd or 4th line winger.
But to your question, I would not give any more than a second to take Okposo.
sabres89 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage