SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

All 31 teams realistic season preview

Équipe: 2019-20 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 25 juill. 2019
Publié: 25 juill. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
For the Ducks, I see them playing there young prospects this year as they look to rebuild/retool to get younger and faster. All there young prospects like, Terry, Jones, Comtois, Steel and Lundestrom may not be ready and the ones that aren’t will be sent down but I put them in there as a way to show what they may do in my opinion.
Playoff Prediction: No playoffs and will be behind 6th or 7th in their division.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2021
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $54 033 757 $0 $2 315 000 $27 466 243 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 541 000 $1 541 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 463 139 $2 463 139 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 498 925 $1 498 925 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
820 000 $820 000 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
UFA - 8
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
697 500 $697 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 200 000 $$1M)
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
894 166 $894 166 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 133 333 $1 133 333 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
25 juill. 2019 à 12 h 19
#1
Log off the internet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 7,838
Mentions "j'aime": 3,867
I would be surprised if Fowler isn’t moved this season.
25 juill. 2019 à 12 h 27
#2
Démarrer sujet
Llinder2016
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 1,562
Mentions "j'aime": 262
Quoting: Hedman77
I would be surprised if Fowler isn’t moved this season.


Possibly, But me personally I don’t see many teams want him with such a down year last year. With only 5G and 18A with 23P and a -14, he will have to show more this year and play how he did in years past before other teams start asking about his availability.
Hedman77 a aimé ceci.
25 juill. 2019 à 12 h 36
#3
Log off the internet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 7,838
Mentions "j'aime": 3,867
Quoting: SDSUFRATMAN
Possibly, But me personally I don’t see many teams want him with such a down year last year. With only 5G and 18A with 23P and a -14, he will have to show more this year and play how he did in years past before other teams start asking about his availability.


True. I’ve got a feeling it has something to do with Montour being gone.
25 juill. 2019 à 12 h 43
#4
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: SDSUFRATMAN
Possibly, But me personally I don’t see many teams want him with such a down year last year. With only 5G and 18A with 23P and a -14, he will have to show more this year and play how he did in years past before other teams start asking about his availability.


59 GP after breaking his orbital bone. Point totals still totally in line with his career numbers (23 points/59 games=0.39 ppg vs 272 points/620 games= 0.43 ppg). Also, +/- is a dumb stat. Played on a team riddled with injuries (most man games lost last season), that ran without Gibby in net for 24 games, and had Carter Rowney as their #1 C for a number of games. What more did you want him to show?

A) No reason to trade him. He's signed long term and fits into the Ducks strategy of developing from within.
B) He has a NTC that limits the team to trading with 4 other teams.
25 juill. 2019 à 12 h 50
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 85
Mentions "j'aime": 12
with that $16mm in cap space....why dont you do my Rangers a solid and take Shatty off our hands??? Ill throw in Vladdy as well because im that nice a guy
25 juill. 2019 à 12 h 58
#6
Démarrer sujet
Llinder2016
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 1,562
Mentions "j'aime": 262
Quoting: Lenny7
59 GP after breaking his orbital bone. Point totals still totally in line with his career numbers (23 points/59 games=0.39 ppg vs 272 points/620 games= 0.43 ppg). Also, +/- is a dumb stat. Played on a team riddled with injuries (most man games lost last season), that ran without Gibby in net for 24 games, and had Carter Rowney as their #1 C for a number of games. What more did you want him to show?

A) No reason to trade him. He's signed long term and fits into the Ducks strategy of developing from within.
B) He has a NTC that limits the team to trading with 4 other teams.


I agree. I think it was a down a year for him and I think it was mostly the team he’s with. I agree the +/- is a dumb stat but lots of people point it out as a way he’s bad player.
25 juill. 2019 à 13 h 3
#7
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: SDSUFRATMAN
I agree. I think it was a down a year for him and I think it was mostly the team he’s with. I agree the +/- is a dumb stat but lots of people point it out as a way he’s bad player.


Naw, the Montour trade meant that one of he or Lindholm was playing with someone that wasn't ready to be put into a top 4 role yet. Too many injuries, not enough depth.

If they can get a RHD that can move up into that role they'd have a good shot at being a sneaky team next year. Could also see him being shifted to the right side, which might hurt him a bit, but he's a sound d-man that the Ducks are lucky to have.
25 juill. 2019 à 13 h 4
#8
Dr.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 2,541
Mentions "j'aime": 1,449
what is the going rate for rakell now adays? i'm sure multiple teams would like to pick him up on that contract
25 juill. 2019 à 13 h 6
#9
Démarrer sujet
Llinder2016
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 1,562
Mentions "j'aime": 262
Quoting: ArakinSkywalker
what is the going rate for rakell now adays? i'm sure multiple teams would like to pick him up on that contract


He won’t get moved
25 juill. 2019 à 13 h 13
#10
Dr.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 2,541
Mentions "j'aime": 1,449
Quoting: SDSUFRATMAN
He won’t get moved


Anyone is available for the right package
25 juill. 2019 à 13 h 27
#11
Démarrer sujet
Llinder2016
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 1,562
Mentions "j'aime": 262
Quoting: ArakinSkywalker
Anyone is available for the right package


True but with a team who wants to get younger and faster with a very great contract, I don’t see him being moved.
25 juill. 2019 à 13 h 34
#12
Dr.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 2,541
Mentions "j'aime": 1,449
Quoting: SDSUFRATMAN
True but with a team who wants to get younger and faster with a very great contract, I don’t see him being moved.


I donno, by the time Anaheim is gonna be ready to be competitive again he's gonna need a raise and be close to 30, his contract is what makes him super appealing to everyone, they would get a really good return for him now.
26 juill. 2019 à 13 h 35
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 16
Mentions "j'aime": 6
why in gods name do you have devin shore on the first line? and why have the kids play 4th line minutes? they have to be in the top 9 or theyre better off in SD
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage